A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

29-inch/700c vs 26" Fat vs Skinney?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 08, 12:54 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
(PeteCresswell)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,790
Default 29-inch/700c vs 26" Fat vs Skinney?

All my bikes currently have 26" wheels.

One wheelset uses WTB Mutano Raptors, another uses 1.25" slicks.

After reading about the supposed wonders of "29-ers", I measured
my wheels at the tread.

The fat ones are 27".

The slicks are only 25".


Seems to me that if I were building that second wheelset again -
the one more-or-less dedicated to skinny tires - I should use a
700c or "29-er" rim in order to get closer to the same actual
tread diameter of both sets of wheels.


Am I missing something here?


My secret agenda is that I'm currently obsessing on ordering a
'cross frame - tb used as an all-around bike - and I'm thinking
maybe I can work off some of my enthusiasm by converting my 26"
skinny wheelset to 700c - or 29, just to see how they work on my
hard tail.

Comments?
--
PeteCresswell
Ads
  #2  
Old August 12th 08, 05:47 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Twohat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default 29-inch/700c vs 26" Fat vs Skinney?

I've built up a pair of wheels using 700C rims and MTB disc hubs to put in
my Rockhopper - I have Schwalbe Marathons on and so far I like it.
I am using 26/38/48 chainset to give a bit more speed on hard surfaces. Its
great on road or off-road so long as it isn't too technical or deep mud.
I suppose the best bits are it feels as responsive as a road bike, but I've
got the control of a mountain bike with the stopping power of disc brakes,
and the gearing to spin up the steepest roads if I want.
Haven't measured the actual diameter but the circumference is almost
identical to my full sus with 2.5inch Michelins
Hope this helps,
Simon

"(PeteCresswell)" wrote in message
...
All my bikes currently have 26" wheels.

One wheelset uses WTB Mutano Raptors, another uses 1.25" slicks.

After reading about the supposed wonders of "29-ers", I measured
my wheels at the tread.

The fat ones are 27".

The slicks are only 25".


Seems to me that if I were building that second wheelset again -
the one more-or-less dedicated to skinny tires - I should use a
700c or "29-er" rim in order to get closer to the same actual
tread diameter of both sets of wheels.


Am I missing something here?


My secret agenda is that I'm currently obsessing on ordering a
'cross frame - tb used as an all-around bike - and I'm thinking
maybe I can work off some of my enthusiasm by converting my 26"
skinny wheelset to 700c - or 29, just to see how they work on my
hard tail.

Comments?
--
PeteCresswell



  #3  
Old August 13th 08, 12:00 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
(PeteCresswell)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,790
Default 29-inch/700c vs 26" Fat vs Skinney?

rPer Twohat:
I suppose the best bits are it feels as responsive as a road bike, but I've
got the control of a mountain bike with the stopping power of disc brakes,
and the gearing to spin up the steepest roads if I want.
Haven't measured the actual diameter but the circumference is almost
identical to my full sus with 2.5inch Michelins
Hope this helps,


Yes, that helps..... I think I'm going ahead with this.

Only remaining question in my mind: 700c or 29'er rims.

Anybody know which rim has the greater diameter?

I've measured 700c's and it looks to me like a 700c with a slick
on it would approximate my 26" WTB Mutano Raptors.

But there aren't any 29-ers around here to measure.

I'm guessing that more MTB-ish rim strength would be available in
a 29-er. True?
--
PeteCresswell
  #4  
Old August 13th 08, 01:19 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Tom Sherman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,890
Default 29-inch/700c vs 26" Fat vs Skinny?

(PeteCresswell) wrote:
rPer Twohat:
I suppose the best bits are it feels as responsive as a road bike, but I've
got the control of a mountain bike with the stopping power of disc brakes,
and the gearing to spin up the steepest roads if I want.
Haven't measured the actual diameter but the circumference is almost
identical to my full sus with 2.5inch Michelins
Hope this helps,


Yes, that helps..... I think I'm going ahead with this.

Only remaining question in my mind: 700c or 29'er rims.

Anybody know which rim has the greater diameter?

I've measured 700c's and it looks to me like a 700c with a slick
on it would approximate my 26" WTB Mutano Raptors.

But there aren't any 29-ers around here to measure.

I'm guessing that more MTB-ish rim strength would be available in
a 29-er. True?


My understanding is that both "700C" and "29-inch" are both ISO 622-mm,
which, lo and behold, has a bead seat diameter of 622-mm.

The only difference is that rims marketed as 700C are likely to be
narrower and intended for road and hybrid bikes, while rims marketed as
29-inch are likely to be wider and intended for off-road use.

If everyone would use the sensible ISO system exclusively, much
confusion would be avoided.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
“Mary had a little lamb / And when she saw it sicken /
She shipped it off to Packingtown / And now it’s labeled chicken.”
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
26" (559bsd) or 650b (584 bsd) wheel in 29"/700c frame? centralvalley Unicycling 5 November 22nd 07 07:17 PM
"Optical inch"? [email protected] Australia 1 September 11th 06 08:03 AM
wtt oval jetstream a900 650c 1" for 700c 1 1/8" gregclimbs Marketplace 0 December 6th 05 12:16 AM
Is a 27 inch wheel v similar to 700C? (Gearing q) Tumbleweed UK 9 July 23rd 04 12:52 PM
Replacing old 27 inch rims with 700c? Chris Hansen General 11 January 26th 04 01:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.