Cyclist who killed pedestrian in high speed crash said people had 'zero respect' for those on bikes, court hears

Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a pedestrian
and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

On 15/08/2017 17:43, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:11:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/08/2017 21:25, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 9:04:02 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
On 14/08/2017 17:15, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no front brake,
which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before their heads
smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/



By his own admission he had 60 feet (at least) to stop, slow down or
swerve, before hitting her. Remarkable that he stayed for the Police,
perhaps he was stunned. How he can be denying manslaughter is beyond
explanation, he caused her death, regardless of any other factors.

Did you or did you not claim it takes 37 metres to stop a bicycle from 20mph?

Does it take thirty seven meters to slow down or change direction?

Ask the 'experts' [1] who claim it takes a bicycle exactly 37 metres to stop from 20mph in all circumstances.

No point in asking you, then?

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:58:07 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 15/08/2017 17:43, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:11:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/08/2017 21:25, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 9:04:02 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
On 14/08/2017 17:15, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no front brake,
which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before their heads
smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/



By his own admission he had 60 feet (at least) to stop, slow down or
swerve, before hitting her. Remarkable that he stayed for the Police,
perhaps he was stunned. How he can be denying manslaughter is beyond
explanation, he caused her death, regardless of any other factors.

Did you or did you not claim it takes 37 metres to stop a bicycle from 20mph?

Does it take thirty seven meters to slow down or change direction?

Ask the 'experts' [1] who claim it takes a bicycle exactly 37 metres to stop from 20mph in all circumstances.

No point in asking you, then?

So you agree the victim was not to blame when the pedestrian, on her phone, walked in to the road in front of him.

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake who has a
job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was arguing.
Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a pedestrian
and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 7:35:24 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake who has a
job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was arguing.
Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a pedestrian
and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

You resorted to childish name calling which means you have nothing coherent to contribute.
I am prepared to debate this issue on an adult basis.

On 15/08/2017 20:04, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 7:35:24 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake who has a
job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was arguing.
Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a pedestrian
and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

You resorted to childish name calling which means you have nothing coherent to contribute.
I am prepared to debate this issue on an adult basis.

That'll be a challenge with Mr Pounder, he only knows childish abusive
language.

Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 7:35:24 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake
who has a job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was
arguing. Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a
pedestrian and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

You resorted to childish name calling which means you have nothing
coherent to contribute. I am prepared to debate this issue on an
adult basis.


Awww, did I call you a nasty name then?
Poor little snowflake cyclist, I've hurt your feelings and now you are all
upset. Do you wear pink lycra?
Care to answer my question?
Here it is again for you:

"Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was
arguing. Please do that".

Bod wrote:
On 15/08/2017 20:04, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 7:35:24 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice before
their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake
who has a job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was
arguing. Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a
pedestrian and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

You resorted to childish name calling which means you have nothing
coherent to contribute. I am prepared to debate this issue on an
adult basis.
That'll be a challenge with Mr Pounder, he only knows childish abusive
language.

I've *again* asked the little snowflake to answer my question.
He is not very bright. Neither are you.
Taking the **** out of dim witted cyclists is fun. Surely you must agree?

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:18:19 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 15/08/2017 20:04, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 7:35:24 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 6:28:45 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:15:52 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no
front brake, which is illegal on British roads.

He allegedly shouted to her to "get out of the way" twice
before their heads smashed together.

What an arrogant ****** this piece of **** really is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ople-had-zero/

Was the pedestrian wearing a helmet?
If not, why not?

Look you lump of ****.

And lost the argument.

I've put my text back. The text you snipped, you little snowflake
who has a job "working" behind a desk.
Now, please show us what argument I've lost and just where I was
arguing. Please do that.

Look you lump of ****. The thing on the illegal bicycle killed a
pedestrian and the above is the best that you can come out with.
You disgust me.

You resorted to childish name calling which means you have nothing
coherent to contribute. I am prepared to debate this issue on an
adult basis.
That'll be a challenge with Mr Pounder, he only knows childish
abusive language.

He's also wrong. It is not illegal to have no brake on your bicycle.
There are no rules governing bicycle state of repair. I rode a bike
with no brakes at all for a year once, I just used my feet to stop,
until I realised I was getting through shoes rather quickly.

Did you even read the report Hucker?

"Mr Alliston had been riding a fixed wheel track bicycle with no front
brake, which is illegal on British roads".

You really are a stupid unemployable pikey.
Please kill yourself, you know that it is the right thing to do.
BTW, somebody said that the dropbox pic of your degree is fake. This makes
all the sense in the world as you always were a cheating lying little ****
all. And always will be.