|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:
I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote: I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. * Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. They can walk! You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking won't help them. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
On 08/09/2017 15:39, Bod wrote:
On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote: I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. * Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. They can walk! You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford to move, walking won't help them. *correction* "afford *to* move". |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
On 08/09/2017 15:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:39:11 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote: I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. * Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. They can walk! You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking won't help them. Moving isn't expensive if you do it yourself. Most indigenous people on those islands only have shacks. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle
On 08/09/2017 15:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:40:45 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 15:39, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote: On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote: I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma. Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence. What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean? It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it? I said those who "choose" to. The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas? What, ALL of them? Can you not understand the word "choose"? Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for your home? There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose* to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are. You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the Gulf. And their reasons for living there. * Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live. This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not* have a *choice*. People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers. Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. They can walk! You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford to move, walking won't help them. * *correction** "afford *to* move". A cockney wanting to write correctly ROTFPMSL! Point out the grammar mistakes for me! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:15:56 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*, ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to move to a safer district. They can walk! YOU can only wank, you filthy ******! -- More of Scottish ****** Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic "life": "I go commando. Underpants are for people suffering from anal seepage." MID: |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:47:59 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: *correction* "afford *to* move". A cockney wanting to write correctly ROTFPMSL! A congenital idiot unable to hide his idiocy! LOL -- More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world: "Most animals don't attack me, even though their owners tell me they're dangerous. I had to laugh at one woman who ran out to tell me her dog was going to bite my hand off, then saw me petting it. I once bought a parrot that was extremely vicious. I walked into his house and picked it up, then cuddled it. He said he'd never seen it do that in 10 years." MID: |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:47:28 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking won't help them. Moving isn't expensive if you do it yourself. Depends of course on what kind of possessions or even houses they have, driveling sociopath! -- More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) Nazism: "Unfortunately Hitler was stopped." MID: "I'd have been a conscientious objector, mainly because I would have taken Hitler's side. Better yet, defect and blow up my own people." MID: "Trump is a mild Hitler. The real deal would be better" MID: "Are you one of those Nazi haters that does so because "it's the right thing to do"? Tell me one thing they did wrong, just one." MID: "Oh come on, wars are fun!" MID: |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:15:36 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: I think LOL! There's the snag again, Birdbrain! -- Mr Pounder Esquire about Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL): "the **** poor delivery boy with no hot running water, 11 cats and several parrots living in his hovel." MID: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel | Joy Beeson | Techniques | 1 | October 5th 16 05:22 PM |
A bicycle's "fuel" efficiency! | [email protected][_2_] | Social Issues | 4 | October 13th 09 11:50 PM |
Rocket fuel | Steve | Racing | 10 | October 3rd 06 07:37 PM |
I Like Rocket Fuel | Tyler Hamillton | Racing | 0 | April 19th 05 04:07 AM |
OT - water shortages 2004 | dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers | UK | 7 | November 3rd 03 11:21 AM |