#1
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
I set the alarm for 5:50pm! Why do I keep doing this? subconcious
wantint to get out of getting up so early? I didn't *really* want to do the BR today? This is why I want my alarm under computer control. My computer will NEVER get it wrong. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ BSDM is fun, nothing like AIX. --Graham Reed |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
"TimC" == TimC writes:
TimC I set the alarm for 5:50pm! Why do I keep doing this? TimC subconcious wantint to get out of getting up so early? I TimC didn't *really* want to do the BR today? Another salient example of why the 24 hour clock is superior to the AM / PM style. -- Cheers Euan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
TimC wrote:
I set the alarm for 5:50pm! Why do I keep doing this? subconcious wantint to get out of getting up so early? I didn't *really* want to do the BR today? This is why I want my alarm under computer control. My computer will NEVER get it wrong. We waited an extra 5 mins but 12 hrs and 5 mins might be pushing it. Great day for a ride. DaveB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
wrote in message news
"TimC" == TimC writes: TimC I set the alarm for 5:50pm! Why do I keep doing this? TimC subconcious wantint to get out of getting up so early? I TimC didn't *really* want to do the BR today? Another salient example of why the 24 hour clock is superior to the AM / PM style. It doesn't help if there's a power failure and the user then sets the time wrong due to a nearby clock being on non-daylight savings time.. as someone might have done on Thursday morning.. 4.40am became 5.40am and my attempt to avoid peak hour traffic was foiled.. hippy "6:20 there 5:43 back" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
"hippy" wrote in message ... wrote in message news "TimC" == TimC writes: TimC I set the alarm for 5:50pm! Why do I keep doing this? TimC subconcious wantint to get out of getting up so early? I TimC didn't *really* want to do the BR today? Another salient example of why the 24 hour clock is superior to the AM / PM style. It doesn't help if there's a power failure and the user then sets the time wrong due to a nearby clock being on non-daylight savings time.. as someone might have done on Thursday morning.. 4.40am became 5.40am and my attempt to avoid peak hour traffic was foiled.. what? your alarm clock doesn't have battery back-up?? you're in IT arent you? got a spare UPS laying around |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 at 12:22 GMT, stu (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: "hippy" wrote in message ... It doesn't help if there's a power failure and the user then sets the time wrong due to a nearby clock being on non-daylight savings time.. as someone might have done on Thursday morning.. 4.40am became 5.40am and my attempt to avoid peak hour traffic was foiled.. what? your alarm clock doesn't have battery back-up?? you're in IT arent you? got a spare UPS laying around Mine is actually connected to the UPS, and also has an internal battery. The internal battery uses an oscillator that is about 50% fast, so if the power goes off for only a few minutes, I have to readjust the clock. The UPS seems to put out 47 Hz or so, so it also makes the clock go bad, just not as quick. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ My code is giving me mixed signals. SIGSEGV then SIGILL then SIGBUS. -- me |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Arrrgggghhhh!
"stu"
It doesn't help if there's a power failure and the user then sets the time wrong due to a nearby clock being on non-daylight savings time.. as someone might have done on Thursday morning.. 4.40am became 5.40am and my attempt to avoid peak hour traffic was foiled.. what? your alarm clock doesn't have battery back-up?? you're in IT arent you? got a spare UPS laying around Unfortunately.. no and no. :-( Good idea though ;-) hippy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|