|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
Howdy!
Reading over several dozen relevant threads from the past 10 or so years, there seems to be mixed feelings about 4x spoking on 36 hole hubs. Some say no problem, some say there is a bit of interference but it's OK, and others say flat-out don't do it. Can anyone say for sure if current (as of 2005) Campagnolo 36 hole rear hubs work OK with a 4x spoke pattern or not? If not, then is a 3x rear wheel better in 32 spokes or 36? Thanks for any comments, Tad |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:29:22 -0800, tad wrote:
Howdy! Reading over several dozen relevant threads from the past 10 or so years, there seems to be mixed feelings about 4x spoking on 36 hole hubs. Some say no problem, some say there is a bit of interference but it's OK, and others say flat-out don't do it. Can anyone say for sure if current (as of 2005) Campagnolo 36 hole rear hubs work OK with a 4x spoke pattern or not? If not, then is a 3x rear wheel better in 32 spokes or 36? For one thing, how could it make any difference what year or model of hub is being used? My experience is that 4x on 36-spoke wheels was OK, but that 3x worked just as well. More than 36 spokes then you would definitely want 4x, less than 36 you would want 3x or fewer. The issue is the angle that the spokes come in to the hub at. With 32 spoke hubs, a 4x pattern would be beyond tangential to the edge of the flange, so you would get interference, but 36 would be OK. One advantage is that with 4x 36 spoke hubs you can swap out a high-flange for a low flange and re-use the same spokes; the flange height doesn't change the spoke length. Granted, this is not something that comes up often, but it did for me once, and will again this winter. -- David L. Johnson __o | "It doesn't get any easier, you just go faster." --Greg LeMond _`\(,_ | (_)/ (_) | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
David L Johnson wrote
One advantage is that with 4x 36 spoke hubs you can swap out a high-flange for a low flange and re-use the same spokes; the flange height doesn't change the spoke length. ? what does it mean PK |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
Someone wrote:
Reading over several dozen relevant threads from the past 10 or so years, there seems to be mixed feelings about 4x spoking on 36 hole hubs. Some say no problem, some say there is a bit of interference but it's OK, and others say flat-out don't do it. Can anyone say for sure if current (as of 2005) Campagnolo 36 hole rear hubs work OK with a 4x spoke pattern or not? If not, then is a 3x rear wheel better in 32 spokes or 36? Peter Chisholm replied: It won't hurt anything but the spokes at the hub flange will overlay a lot of the flange. Kinda like 28 and 3 cross. No real reason to do 4 cross on 36, 32 3 cross along with 36, 40 4 cross is what I use. I'm with Peter on this. It is just plain silly do do 4 cross on a 36 spoke wheel. It offers zero benefit vis-a-vis 36, and requires using oddball spoke lengths. Sheldon "What's The Point?" Brown +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Love seems the swiftest, but it is the slowest of all growths. | | No man or woman really knows what perfect love is until they | | have been married a quarter of a century. --Mark Twain | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 http://harriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
With
32 spoke hubs, a 4x pattern would be beyond tangential to the edge of the flange, so you would get interference, but 36 would be OK. Isn't "beyond tangential" essentially useless? -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Current (2005) Campagnolo 36 spoke hubs OK for 4x?
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:45:40 -0500, Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote:
With 32 spoke hubs, a 4x pattern would be beyond tangential to the edge of the flange, so you would get interference, but 36 would be OK. Isn't "beyond tangential" essentially useless? Yes. -- David L. Johnson __o | The lottery is a tax on those who fail to understand _`\(,_ | mathematics. (_)/ (_) | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/s * 2005 Campagnolo Compontents * | Dan Donnelly | Marketplace | 0 | September 25th 05 11:10 PM |
FA: Campagnolo Hi-flange Record Pista hubs | Gemma_k | Marketplace | 0 | September 1st 05 06:34 AM |
105 flange failure pics | cashrefundman | Techniques | 26 | November 30th 04 06:37 PM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
MA3 rim failure, where to now | jt | UK | 481 | October 10th 03 10:20 PM |