|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shimano UN52 through UN73 BB's
Well I finally managed to wear out the balls and spindle in my cup and
cone bottom bracket after xx000 miles. Actually if I had bothered to read some of the maintenance posts and replaced the balls two years ago it might have lasted longer. Been looking at the Shimano UN52 through UN73 cartridge product line for a replacement. Are the UN73 models sealed better than the less expensive models or just lighter in weight? I doubt I would notice the difference unless the bearings are of lower precision or not as durable. What has been other peoples experience? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message news Well I finally managed to wear out the balls and spindle in my cup and cone bottom bracket after xx000 miles. Actually if I had bothered to read some of the maintenance posts and replaced the balls two years ago it might have lasted longer. Been looking at the Shimano UN52 through UN73 cartridge product line for a replacement. Are the UN73 models sealed better than the less expensive models or just lighter in weight? I doubt I would notice the difference unless the bearings are of lower precision or not as durable. What has been other peoples experience? UN-7X have a hollow axle, so they're lighter. Not sure about the bearings, but I certainly can't tell a difference in a few thousand miles. One nice advantage of the hollow axle is that you can use a skewer to hold the BB removal tool in place while you crank on the wrench. Not that big of a deal I guess. Kyle |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 08:44:57 +0100, Zog The Undeniable
wrote: wrote: Well I finally managed to wear out the balls and spindle in my cup and cone bottom bracket after xx000 miles. Actually if I had bothered to read some of the maintenance posts and replaced the balls two years ago it might have lasted longer. Been looking at the Shimano UN52 through UN73 cartridge product line for a replacement. Are the UN73 models sealed better than the less expensive models or just lighter in weight? I doubt I would notice the difference unless the bearings are of lower precision or not as durable. What has been other peoples experience? I destroyed a UN52 in 70 miles. I replaced it with a UN72 which is beginning to feel a bit rough after 3000. I don't think they last as long as cup and cone in Californian conditions, but all the cup and cone BBs I've used have died because of water penetration. Having said all that, I do seem to be exceptionally hard on BBs. I know I have a lopsided pedalling style because my right gastrocnemius muscle is about 1.5 times thicker than the left one, and this can't help much. Sounds like the UN52 that only went 70 miles had a manufacturing defect that caused a catastrophic failure? I don't like the idea of going from 1/4 inch balls in the cup and cone setup down to 3/16 in the cartridge. I would have bought another C&C setup but my LBS recommended a cartridge replacement. Here in Florida we get caught in the rain quite often so seal longevity does need to be considered. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:16:36 GMT, "Kyle.B.H" wrote:
wrote in message news Well I finally managed to wear out the balls and spindle in my cup and cone bottom bracket after xx000 miles. Actually if I had bothered to read some of the maintenance posts and replaced the balls two years ago it might have lasted longer. Been looking at the Shimano UN52 through UN73 cartridge product line for a replacement. Are the UN73 models sealed better than the less expensive models or just lighter in weight? I doubt I would notice the difference unless the bearings are of lower precision or not as durable. What has been other peoples experience? UN-7X have a hollow axle, so they're lighter. Not sure about the bearings, but I certainly can't tell a difference in a few thousand miles. One nice advantage of the hollow axle is that you can use a skewer to hold the BB removal tool in place while you crank on the wrench. Not that big of a deal I guess. Kyle I am not completely sold on the cartridges with the smaller ball bearing sizes lasting as long as a C&C regardless of the price. Maybe a generic inexpensive aluminum cup replacement would be the way to go if I'm only going to get 3000 miles out of it anyways? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
dsr- Are the UN73
models sealed better than the less expensive models or just lighter in weight? BRBR Hollow axle vs solid, otherwise pretty identical. BTW-Phil Wood makes some really nice compatible BBs that will last a LONG time and are rebuildable. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... I am not completely sold on the cartridges with the smaller ball bearing sizes lasting as long as a C&C regardless of the price. Maybe a generic inexpensive aluminum cup replacement would be the way to go if I'm only going to get 3000 miles out of it anyways? I weigh 235, ride in the rain/slush/snow frequently, and get many more miles than that out of UH52's. The last one I replaced had perhaps 15K miles on it and had just developed a little bit of axial play. Since they only cost $20 or so, it's not a big deal to replace them every few years, I'd be overhauling C&C BB's more frequently than that anyway. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:19:33 GMT, "Peter Cole"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I am not completely sold on the cartridges with the smaller ball bearing sizes lasting as long as a C&C regardless of the price. Maybe a generic inexpensive aluminum cup replacement would be the way to go if I'm only going to get 3000 miles out of it anyways? I weigh 235, ride in the rain/slush/snow frequently, and get many more miles than that out of UH52's. The last one I replaced had perhaps 15K miles on it and had just developed a little bit of axial play. Since they only cost $20 or so, it's not a big deal to replace them every few years, I'd be overhauling C&C BB's more frequently than that anyway. 15K is about the number of miles I got with each of my last two C&C BB's. After about 7500 miles the cones started needing adjustments. Given the unbalanced alternating nature of pedaling, bearing races must wear unevenly. My thinking is that once a bottom bracket wears enough to make noise it probably should be canned anyways. Cartridges with plastic cups look a little flimsy and would require a special tool to install. I'm wondering if I could get away with using a dull chisel to tap metal cups around with as long as I have clean shell threads? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on bike gear technology advancement | John Morgan | Mountain Biking | 28 | June 19th 04 05:09 AM |
FS Large list of parts and bikes | Marketplace | 0 | October 28th 03 05:55 AM | |
5 pages of new parts for sale | Marketplace | 1 | October 28th 03 01:30 AM | |
ICYCLES Inventory List | ICYCLES | Marketplace | 0 | July 26th 03 08:25 PM |
Shimano (and others) OEM component stream... | Qui si parla Campagnolo | Techniques | 14 | July 24th 03 01:43 AM |