#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
On May 21, 11:35 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... No posts to ARBR for several days now. Has ARBR finally bit the dust? Tom Sherman has taken another one of his many leaves of absence. I could drag some of the posts from the other cycling newsgroups over here for us to ponder, but what is the use. This newsgroup died and went to hell several years ago. I have decided to leave it be. ARBR - RIP! ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you cnat' have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why dont you. In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. Repeating an assertion does not make it anymore true than it was when first uttered. Introduction of unsubstantiated allegations is a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's ... one that reveals a flaw in his character and undermines his credibility. Ed Dolan's lowly opinion of ARBR member's level of intelligence dictates the degree of credence that ARBR members should place in the veracity and validity of Ed Dolan's posts. the most notorious stalker that the world of Usenet has ever known. But Tom Sherman is most to blame for the death of this newsgroup. He stood by and let it happen. A brave man dies but once, a coward dies a thousand deaths. The only one blameless in this entire tale of woe is Ed Dolan the Great. He is as pure as the driven snow. If only the group had had more like him and less like the aforementioned, this group would now be the best cycling newsgroup instead of having died an ignoble death. Nay, not even the Great Ed Dolan could save the group from itself. ARBR - RIP! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On May 21, 11:35 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... No posts to ARBR for several days now. Has ARBR finally bit the dust? Tom Sherman has taken another one of his many leaves of absence. I could drag some of the posts from the other cycling newsgroups over here for us to ponder, but what is the use. This newsgroup died and went to hell several years ago. I have decided to leave it be. ARBR - RIP! ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you cnat' have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why dont you. In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. All anyone has to do to see who is lying is to go to the Google Archives for ARBR from a couple of years ago and see who was saying what to whom and how it was being said - and then note how silent Tom Sherman was during the entire episode. I understand scalawags like Ed Gin and Jim McNamara, but Tom Sherman remains an eternal mystery to me. Repeating an assertion does not make it anymore true than it was when first uttered. Introduction of unsubstantiated allegations is a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's ... one that reveals a flaw in his character and undermines his credibility. Ed Dolan's lowly opinion of ARBR member's level of intelligence dictates the degree of credence that ARBR members should place in the veracity and validity of Ed Dolan's posts. My low opinion of the members of ARBR is well illustrated by posts such as yours. The only messages I find worth reading are my own - which eternally confirm My Greatness! Yea, I have become a legend in my own mind. the most notorious stalker that the world of Usenet has ever known. But Tom Sherman is most to blame for the death of this newsgroup. He stood by and let it happen. A brave man dies but once, a coward dies a thousand deaths. The only one blameless in this entire tale of woe is Ed Dolan the Great. He is as pure as the driven snow. If only the group had had more like him and less like the aforementioned, this group would now be the best cycling newsgroup instead of having died an ignoble death. Nay, not even the Great Ed Dolan could save the group from itself. ARBR - RIP! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
On May 22, 1:41 pm, JimmyMac wrote:
On May 21, 11:35 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... No posts to ARBR for several days now. Has ARBR finally bit the dust? Tom Sherman has taken another one of his many leaves of absence. I could drag some of the posts from the other cycling newsgroups over here for us to ponder, but what is the use. This newsgroup died and went to hell several years ago. I have decided to leave it be. ARBR - RIP! ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you cnat' have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why dont you. In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. Repeating an assertion does not make it anymore true than it was when first uttered. Introduction of unsubstantiated allegations is a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's ... one that reveals a flaw in his character and undermines his credibility. Ed Dolan's lowly opinion of ARBR member's level of intelligence dictates the degree of credence that ARBR members should place in the veracity and validity of Ed Dolan's posts. the most notorious stalker that the world of Usenet has ever known. But Tom Sherman is most to blame for the death of this newsgroup. He stood by and let it happen. A brave man dies but once, a coward dies a thousand deaths. The only one blameless in this entire tale of woe is Ed Dolan the Great. He is as pure as the driven snow. If only the group had had more like him and less like the aforementioned, this group would now be the best cycling newsgroup instead of having died an ignoble death. Nay, not even the Great Ed Dolan could save the group from itself. ARBR - RIP! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Finally somebody other than Ed Dolan replied to Ed Dolan. You're messing up his conversation with himself. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
"bluezfolk" wrote in message ... [...] Finally somebody other than Ed Dolan replied to Ed Dolan. You're messing up his conversation with himself. Wait until I take a Devil's advocate position. That is when I start arguing with myself. That will drive everyone as crazy as I am, so it is far better that others get in on the conversation. After all, a little reality never hurt anything. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
On May 22, 2:34 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On May 21, 11:35 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... No posts to ARBR for several days now. Has ARBR finally bit the dust? Tom Sherman has taken another one of his many leaves of absence. I could drag some of the posts from the other cycling newsgroups over here for us to ponder, but what is the use. This newsgroup died and went to hell several years ago. I have decided to leave it be. ARBR - RIP! ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you can't have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why don't you? In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. All anyone has to do to see who is lying is to go to the Google Archives for ARBR from a couple of years ago and see who was saying what to whom and how it was being said I can only presume that you were so bold because you are confident that no one aould ever follow your advice or I would have cautioned to to tread softly. Just where do you suppose the quotes ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." can be found? Why in the Google Archives for ARBR. That's where and whose words might they be? Well there yours and stand in utter contradiction of you unsubstantiated assertion (read LIE) that I aided and abetted Ed Gin. You really should make a concerted effort not to say things you cannot prove and not say things that contradict what you have already written so as not to undermine your credibility and illustrate what a fool you are. Also in the Goolge Archives for ARBR can be found the following quote of yours ... "I will stand by every message I have ever posted to Usenet, bar none. Some of my posts will require some explanation no doubt, but I can defend and justify everything I have ever said to anyone." So how do you propose to stand by two diametrically opposed accounts? Some of your posts require some explanation for sure, but good luck defending and justifying incongruous contradiction. The conundrum continues! - and then note how silent Tom Sherman was during the entire episode. I understand scalawags like Ed Gin and Jim McNamara, but Tom Sherman remains an eternal mystery to me. Repeating an assertion does not make it anymore true than it was when first uttered. Introduction of unsubstantiated allegations is a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's ... one that reveals a flaw in his character and undermines his credibility. Ed Dolan's lowly opinion of ARBR member's level of intelligence dictates the degree of credence that ARBR members should place in the veracity and validity of Ed Dolan's posts. My low opinion of the members of ARBR is well illustrated by posts such as yours. The only messages I find worth reading are my own - which eternally confirm My Greatness! Yea, I have become a legend in my own mind. the most notorious stalker that the world of Usenet has ever known. But Tom Sherman is most to blame for the death of this newsgroup. He stood by and let it happen. A brave man dies but once, a coward dies a thousand deaths. The only one blameless in this entire tale of woe is Ed Dolan the Great. He is as pure as the driven snow. If only the group had had more like him and less like the aforementioned, this group would now be the best cycling newsgroup instead of having died an ignoble death. Nay, not even the Great Ed Dolan could save the group from itself. ARBR - RIP! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On May 22, 2:34 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you can't have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why don't you? In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. All anyone has to do to see who is lying is to go to the Google Archives for ARBR from a couple of years ago and see who was saying what to whom and how it was being said I can only presume that you were so bold because you are confident that no one aould ever follow your advice or I would have cautioned to to tread softly. Just where do you suppose the quotes ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." can be found? Why in the Google Archives for ARBR. That's where and whose words might they be? Well, that was then, this is now. Well there yours and stand in utter contradiction of you unsubstantiated assertion (read LIE) that I aided and abetted Ed Gin. You really should make a concerted effort not to say things you cannot prove and not say things that contradict what you have already written so as not to undermine your credibility and illustrate what a fool you are. I hold you responsible for bringing Ed Gin to this newsgroup (ARBR). You should have kept your squabbles with him confined to emails. After all, you knew the kind of criminal he was. Why did you inflict him on the group? Also in the Goolge Archives for ARBR can be found the following quote of yours ... "I will stand by every message I have ever posted to Usenet, bar none. Some of my posts will require some explanation no doubt, but I can defend and justify everything I have ever said to anyone." So how do you propose to stand by two diametrically opposed accounts? Some of your posts require some explanation for sure, but good luck defending and justifying incongruous contradiction. The conundrum continues! You have earned for yourself the reputation of a stalker. This supersedes whatever qualities you may have had in the past. [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
"Edward Dolan" writes:
Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota His headers contain "Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:19:39 -0500". Insomnia perhaps? :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
"Bill Z." wrote in message ... "Edward Dolan" writes: Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota His headers contain "Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:19:39 -0500". Insomnia perhaps? :-) I keep the oddest hours of anyone in the known universe. I am more often than not just going to bed when others are just getting up. Except when I go out of the house to do chores or go for a bike ride I live in a darkened room with the curtains permanently drawn. I sometime do not know if it is AM or PM unless I look out the window and I lose all track of the days of the week. Ever since I was 30 I have lived in an eternity of Saturdays. I scare myself sometimes when I am not sure of the month, but I never confuse the seasons. It is always 9 long months of winter here in Minnesota and only 3 short months of summer. One of these days I am going to go down to my dirt floor basement and hang myself from the rafters. But I am waiting for my 20 cats to precede me in death. After all, they depend on me. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is ARBR dead?
On May 23, 1:19 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On May 22, 2:34 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it died sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with his odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim McNamara, Abetted??? Well you can't have it both ways so make up you feeble mind why don't you? In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him. All anyone has to do to see who is lying is to go to the Google Archives for ARBR from a couple of years ago and see who was saying what to whom and how it was being said I can only presume that you were so bold because you are confident that no one would ever follow your advice or I would have cautioned to to tread softly. Just where do you suppose the quotes ... "Jim is an expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." can be found? Why in the Google Archives for ARBR. That's where and whose words might they be? Well, that was then, this is now. An your NOW contraditcs your THEN Well there yours and stand in utter contradiction of you unsubstantiated assertion (read LIE) that I aided and abetted Ed Gin. You really should make a concerted effort not to say things you cannot prove and not say things that contradict what you have already written so as not to undermine your credibility and illustrate what a fool you are. I hold you responsible for bringing Ed Gin to this newsgroup (ARBR). You should have kept your squabbles with him confined to emails. After all, you knew the kind of criminal he was. Why did you inflict him on the group? AND, I hold you responsible for backing up what you say. Can you corroborate what you've asserted with incontrovertible evidence and/or anything even remotely resembling a logical, well-reasoned argument? . You subscribe to the fanciful notion that truth is not half as important as what people believe the truth to be. and in repeating a LIE long enough, someone will eventually begin to believe you. Also in the Goolge Archives for ARBR can be found the following quote of yours ... "I will stand by every message I have ever posted to Usenet, bar none. Some of my posts will require some explanation no doubt, but I can defend and justify everything I have ever said to anyone." So how do you propose to stand by two diametrically opposed accounts? Some of your posts require some explanation for sure, but good luck defending and justifying incongruous contradiction. The conundrum continues! You have earned for yourself the reputation of a stalker. This supersedes whatever qualities you may have had in the past. Diversion duly noted and expected. A stalker has a solitary virtue that Ed Dolan, the equal opportunity offender, lacks ... singularity of focus. Ed Dolan has publicly announced his gratitude for the attention I have given him. What did he say? "Jim McNamara, you are my perennial stalker. How would I ever get though the week without you here to remind me of what a jackass I am." [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|