Cyclist in accident drives off

JNugent wrote:
Paul Boyd wrote:

HarryHill said,

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a petition
calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through Hailey Park after
her dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist, who then immediately rode off.

That cyclist should be shot. Regardless of whose fault it was, and
the article doesn't say, the cyclist should at the very least have
stopped to make sure the dog was OK. Despicable, cowardly behaviour,
IMO.

Maybe. maybe not.

What if he's frightened of dogs (and/or irate dog owners)?

That is meant as a serious point.

Okay, fair enough. I think its an unfair position to take, since a
motorist would never get away with leaving the scene of a serious
accident because he was 'scared'. But, nevertheless, I accept that its
possible. So, once free of the immediate area, why didn't the cyclist
phone the law shop and tell them of the incident?

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:43:54 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:

snip

"Shared path" seems to be a pretty stupid concept. Like riding on
pavements.

You are right - not just a stupid concept - I believe that in general
riding on pavements is illegal.


Really, well why didn't you say so before? People could be killed.

I have realised that there are a significant number of thickos in this
group who do not understand that traffic laws do apply to cyclists.

I do my best to educate them.



--
I believe the driver is also responsible for the use of seat belts of
passengers. (Guy Chapman)

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:42:50 +0100, Marc
wrote:

judith wrote:



Excellent - when I first saw the OP - I knew that there would be one
of the resident ****wits along soon with that sort of question.



Yes, but you, like your mate, are a troll. What trolls believe , know,
think or say isn't important.


important? - no you are right - worthwhile? - yes - It is when it's
taking the **** out of a maggot.




--
I believe the driver is also responsible for the use of seat belts of
passengers. (Guy Chapman)

judith wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:42:50 +0100, Marc
wrote:

judith wrote:


Excellent - when I first saw the OP - I knew that there would be one
of the resident ****wits along soon with that sort of question.


Yes, but you, like your mate, are a troll. What trolls believe , know,
think or say isn't important.


important? - no you are right - worthwhile? - yes - It is when it's
taking the **** out of a maggot.

As usual, you're wrong; nothing a troll does is useful or worthwhile,
except to be used as an example to others.

Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
Peter Grange wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:52:07 +0100, nully wrote:

Marc wrote:
HarryHill wrote:
‘There may be serious consequences if a cyclist hits a child’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa...1466-21415408/



CALLS have been made for the widening of a pedestrian and cycle
path after a dog was hit by a bicycle.

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a
petition calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through
Hailey Park after her dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist, who
then immediately rode off.

My money is on the little turd dispenser either being on a 35ft
extendable lead or not being on one at all.
Which gives the cyclist the right to simply ride off and ignore
the incident then? Cycles should be required to carry reg plates
to avoid cowardly behaviour such as this. Be nice to see some
posters condemn the cyclist leaving the scene *irrespective of
fault*, but I guess I'm asking for too much there - after all,
cyclists are beyond fault, right?

Out of common courtesy the cyclist should have stopped, IMO. Please
don't extend the act of one person to "all cyclists are beyond fault,
right?".

Stopped to be bitten?
Stopped to be attacked by the "aggrieved" owner?

Loose turd dispenser,
Loose turd dispenser is scared but unhurt by cyclist
Loose turd dispenser learns lesson
Turd dispenser's owner doesn't learn lesson and starts a petition
to spend £100,000s rather than her buying a lead

What possible help would it have been for the cyclist to have stopped?

Do me a favour, Marc. Please cycle into *my* dog and ride off. Or
rather, attempt to.

I find it much funnier to use the airzound.

Hmmmm, deliberate and intentional attempt to frighten and harrass
legitimate path user?

No, an attempt to stop the little turd rat running between my wheel and
bottom bracket, hurting both of us.

Fine, have a go. I'm reasonably confident my dog
will 'intimidate' you rather more than you intimidate it )

Whilst it's on a lead? How could it do so?

Well I'm afraid I might have accidentally let go of it.

When that happened
The turd dispenser:-
Levitated 18 inches
Rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise , whilst still in the air.
Started running at exactly the same speed I was cycling, in the
direction I was cycling.
Leaving behind it's owner calling "Doggikins" in a forlorn manner.
Looked over it's shoulder every 20 seconds to see me still there.
2 miles later it dashed for the bushes.

With a bit of luck the owner might have learnt that when it was
taking its dog out for a walk ( Dog owner speak for " taking the dog
to **** somewhere that isn't my patch") It might be a good idea to
put it on a lead.
With even more luck the turd dispenser got lost forever, died and
the owner got put off buying another one.

What a delightful piece of vermin you are. C'mon, cycle round here.
The dog needs feeding anyway.
You really don't understand your place in things do you?


You are here to have the **** extracted out of you and to see whether
it's possible to see spittle via text, it's your only function(s).

Oh I get it. Now you're attempting to backtrack your foul comments on
the basis that you were just trying to wind someone up? LOL, nice try.
Like I said, you're welcome to ride round Lincoln and see if you come
across 48 kilos of GSD coming the other way...

Marc wrote:
judith wrote:



Excellent - when I first saw the OP - I knew that there would be one
of the resident ****wits along soon with that sort of question.



Yes, but you, like your mate, are a troll. What trolls believe , know,
think or say isn't important.

Is Paul Boyd a troll? LMFAO - how can you possibly cycle with that many
bullets in your foot?

aquachimp wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:27 pm, HarryHill wrote:
‘There may be serious consequences if a cyclist hits a child’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa.../there-may-be-...

CALLS have been made for the widening of a pedestrian and cycle path
after a dog was hit by a bicycle.

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a petition
calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through Hailey Park after her
dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist, who then immediately rode off.

A curious segment from that article;
"In May, Friends of Hailey Park and sustainable transport charity
Sustrans supported a bike safety event at the park, encouraging
cyclists to respect other path-users"

I note it's not, Cyclists of Hailey Park and sustainable transport
charity Sustrans supported a bike safety event at the park,
encouraging dog owners and childminders to respect path-users.

It takes a lot of abuse to get people up of their collective ass and
engage in such a protest. Those cyclists must be a right bunch of
arseholes and little wonder given how in here they selfishness is
defended tooth and nail at every hands turn.

Jesus wept, I take it all back. Seems there *are* some sensible people
posting in here. Such a shame they appear to be in the minority!

nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
Peter Grange wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:52:07 +0100, nully wrote:

Marc wrote:
HarryHill wrote:
‘There may be serious consequences if a cyclist hits a child’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa...1466-21415408/



CALLS have been made for the widening of a pedestrian and
cycle path after a dog was hit by a bicycle.

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a
petition calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through
Hailey Park after her dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist, who
then immediately rode off.

My money is on the little turd dispenser either being on a 35ft
extendable lead or not being on one at all.
Which gives the cyclist the right to simply ride off and ignore
the incident then? Cycles should be required to carry reg plates
to avoid cowardly behaviour such as this. Be nice to see some
posters condemn the cyclist leaving the scene *irrespective of
fault*, but I guess I'm asking for too much there - after all,
cyclists are beyond fault, right?

Out of common courtesy the cyclist should have stopped, IMO. Please
don't extend the act of one person to "all cyclists are beyond
fault,
right?".

Stopped to be bitten?
Stopped to be attacked by the "aggrieved" owner?

Loose turd dispenser,
Loose turd dispenser is scared but unhurt by cyclist
Loose turd dispenser learns lesson
Turd dispenser's owner doesn't learn lesson and starts a petition
to spend £100,000s rather than her buying a lead

What possible help would it have been for the cyclist to have
stopped?

Do me a favour, Marc. Please cycle into *my* dog and ride off. Or
rather, attempt to.

I find it much funnier to use the airzound.

Hmmmm, deliberate and intentional attempt to frighten and harrass
legitimate path user?

No, an attempt to stop the little turd rat running between my wheel
and bottom bracket, hurting both of us.

No answer?

Fine, have a go. I'm reasonably confident my dog
will 'intimidate' you rather more than you intimidate it )

Whilst it's on a lead? How could it do so?

Well I'm afraid I might have accidentally let go of it.

I'm sure you will support the police then in their attempts to shoot
this out of control dangerous animal?

When that happened
The turd dispenser:-
Levitated 18 inches
Rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise , whilst still in the air.
Started running at exactly the same speed I was cycling, in the
direction I was cycling.
Leaving behind it's owner calling "Doggikins" in a forlorn manner.
Looked over it's shoulder every 20 seconds to see me still there.
2 miles later it dashed for the bushes.

With a bit of luck the owner might have learnt that when it was
taking its dog out for a walk ( Dog owner speak for " taking the dog
to **** somewhere that isn't my patch") It might be a good idea to
put it on a lead.
With even more luck the turd dispenser got lost forever, died and
the owner got put off buying another one.

What a delightful piece of vermin you are. C'mon, cycle round here.
The dog needs feeding anyway.
You really don't understand your place in things do you?


You are here to have the **** extracted out of you and to see whether
it's possible to see spittle via text, it's your only function(s).

Oh I get it. Now you're attempting to backtrack your foul comments on
the basis that you were just trying to wind someone up?

No not at all. I'm just explaining why I bother replying to you.
LOL, nice try.
Like I said, you're welcome to ride round Lincoln and see if you come
across 48 kilos of GSD coming the other way...

There are only so many cabbages I can take in a day.

Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
Peter Grange wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:52:07 +0100, nully wrote:

Marc wrote:
HarryHill wrote:
‘There may be serious consequences if a cyclist hits a child’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa...1466-21415408/



CALLS have been made for the widening of a pedestrian and
cycle path after a dog was hit by a bicycle.

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a
petition calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through
Hailey Park after her dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist,
who then immediately rode off.

My money is on the little turd dispenser either being on a
35ft extendable lead or not being on one at all.
Which gives the cyclist the right to simply ride off and ignore
the incident then? Cycles should be required to carry reg
plates to avoid cowardly behaviour such as this. Be nice to see
some posters condemn the cyclist leaving the scene
*irrespective of fault*, but I guess I'm asking for too much
there - after all, cyclists are beyond fault, right?

Out of common courtesy the cyclist should have stopped, IMO. Please
don't extend the act of one person to "all cyclists are beyond
fault,
right?".

Stopped to be bitten?
Stopped to be attacked by the "aggrieved" owner?

Loose turd dispenser,
Loose turd dispenser is scared but unhurt by cyclist
Loose turd dispenser learns lesson
Turd dispenser's owner doesn't learn lesson and starts a petition
to spend £100,000s rather than her buying a lead

What possible help would it have been for the cyclist to have
stopped?

Do me a favour, Marc. Please cycle into *my* dog and ride off. Or
rather, attempt to.

I find it much funnier to use the airzound.

Hmmmm, deliberate and intentional attempt to frighten and harrass
legitimate path user?

No, an attempt to stop the little turd rat running between my wheel
and bottom bracket, hurting both of us.

No answer?

Fine, have a go. I'm reasonably confident my dog
will 'intimidate' you rather more than you intimidate it )

Whilst it's on a lead? How could it do so?

Well I'm afraid I might have accidentally let go of it.

I'm sure you will support the police then in their attempts to shoot
this out of control dangerous animal?

Oh no, it wont be "out of control" at all! As soon as I tell it to stop
eating you, it will. It just might take me a moment or too before I
remember the command, is all...


When that happened
The turd dispenser:-
Levitated 18 inches
Rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise , whilst still in the air.
Started running at exactly the same speed I was cycling, in the
direction I was cycling.
Leaving behind it's owner calling "Doggikins" in a forlorn manner.
Looked over it's shoulder every 20 seconds to see me still there.
2 miles later it dashed for the bushes.

With a bit of luck the owner might have learnt that when it was
taking its dog out for a walk ( Dog owner speak for " taking the
dog to **** somewhere that isn't my patch") It might be a good idea
to put it on a lead.
With even more luck the turd dispenser got lost forever, died and
the owner got put off buying another one.

What a delightful piece of vermin you are. C'mon, cycle round here.
The dog needs feeding anyway.
You really don't understand your place in things do you?


You are here to have the **** extracted out of you and to see whether
it's possible to see spittle via text, it's your only function(s).

Oh I get it. Now you're attempting to backtrack your foul comments on
the basis that you were just trying to wind someone up?

No not at all. I'm just explaining why I bother replying to you.

Have you ever wondered which end of the line has the hook on it?

LOL, nice try.
Like I said, you're welcome to ride round Lincoln and see if you come
across 48 kilos of GSD coming the other way...

There are only so many cabbages I can take in a day.

Nah, Cocoa doesn't *like* cabbage. She *loves* calf muscle, though!

nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
nully wrote:
Marc wrote:
Peter Grange wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:52:07 +0100, nully wrote:

Marc wrote:
HarryHill wrote:
‘There may be serious consequences if a cyclist hits a child’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa...1466-21415408/



CALLS have been made for the widening of a pedestrian and
cycle path after a dog was hit by a bicycle.

Anne-Marie Wilkins, 37, from Llandaff North, is starting a
petition calling for the Taff Trail to be widened through
Hailey Park after her dog Bonny was run over by a cyclist,
who then immediately rode off.

My money is on the little turd dispenser either being on a
35ft extendable lead or not being on one at all.
Which gives the cyclist the right to simply ride off and
ignore the incident then? Cycles should be required to carry
reg plates to avoid cowardly behaviour such as this. Be nice
to see some posters condemn the cyclist leaving the scene
*irrespective of fault*, but I guess I'm asking for too much
there - after all, cyclists are beyond fault, right?

Out of common courtesy the cyclist should have stopped, IMO.
Please
don't extend the act of one person to "all cyclists are beyond
fault,
right?".

Stopped to be bitten?
Stopped to be attacked by the "aggrieved" owner?

Loose turd dispenser,
Loose turd dispenser is scared but unhurt by cyclist
Loose turd dispenser learns lesson
Turd dispenser's owner doesn't learn lesson and starts a
petition to spend £100,000s rather than her buying a lead

What possible help would it have been for the cyclist to have
stopped?

Do me a favour, Marc. Please cycle into *my* dog and ride off. Or
rather, attempt to.

I find it much funnier to use the airzound.

Hmmmm, deliberate and intentional attempt to frighten and harrass
legitimate path user?

No, an attempt to stop the little turd rat running between my wheel
and bottom bracket, hurting both of us.

No answer?

Still no answer?

Fine, have a go. I'm reasonably confident my dog
will 'intimidate' you rather more than you intimidate it )

Whilst it's on a lead? How could it do so?

Well I'm afraid I might have accidentally let go of it.

I'm sure you will support the police then in their attempts to shoot
this out of control dangerous animal?

Oh no, it wont be "out of control" at all! As soon as I tell it to stop
eating you, it will. It just might take me a moment or too before I
remember the command, is all...

Ahh so it's "under control" when attacking?


When that happened
The turd dispenser:-
Levitated 18 inches
Rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise , whilst still in the air.
Started running at exactly the same speed I was cycling, in the
direction I was cycling.
Leaving behind it's owner calling "Doggikins" in a forlorn manner.
Looked over it's shoulder every 20 seconds to see me still there.
2 miles later it dashed for the bushes.

With a bit of luck the owner might have learnt that when it was
taking its dog out for a walk ( Dog owner speak for " taking the
dog to **** somewhere that isn't my patch") It might be a good
idea to put it on a lead.
With even more luck the turd dispenser got lost forever, died and
the owner got put off buying another one.

What a delightful piece of vermin you are. C'mon, cycle round here.
The dog needs feeding anyway.
You really don't understand your place in things do you?


You are here to have the **** extracted out of you and to see
whether it's possible to see spittle via text, it's your only
function(s).

Oh I get it. Now you're attempting to backtrack your foul comments on
the basis that you were just trying to wind someone up?

No not at all. I'm just explaining why I bother replying to you.

Have you ever wondered which end of the line has the hook on it?

Nope, I can stop whenever I want to, just like this...