Council that fined girl, 5, for running lemonade stand slaps bikeshop owners with penalty for offering a free pump

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 19:59:49 +0100, Tony Dragon wrote:

On 02-Aug-17 1:49 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:23:30 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few goods
outside to encourage custom. And the council are blatantly lying.
You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a narrow
pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items filling the
remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I tend to
think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For ****'s
sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get on with life.

..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop being "so
damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those bikes and those
cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or, heaven forbid in a
wheelchair.

If the wheelchair or pram can't get through where I can walk through,
it's unfit for purpose. Why change the entire world for them instead of
just changing their wheelchairs? Your taxes are funding the disabled folk.


You must be very fat.

Nope, 10.5 stone.

--
What's the German word for Vaseline?
Vienerslide.

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:07:01 +0100, Tony Dragon wrote:

On 02-Aug-17 4:25 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:21:53 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 13:49, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:23:30 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few goods
outside to encourage custom. And the council are blatantly lying.
You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a narrow
pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items
filling the
remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I tend to
think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For
****'s
sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get on with life.
..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop being "so
damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those bikes and those
cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or, heaven forbid in a
wheelchair.

If the wheelchair or pram can't get through where I can walk through,
it's unfit for purpose.

Bull****, a wheelchair is a lot wider than a person walking.

Then it shouldn't be.

How can a wheelchair not be wider than the person sitting in it?

Because your arse is not as wide as your shoulders/arms.

And it should be able to traverse a kerb to go
round the obstruction.

So you want them to go in the road, don't forget they have to go down
the kerb perpendicular to it, get past the obstruction, and then go up
the kerb in the same way.

And the wheels should be capable of this. How do they cope with wheelie bins?

Besides
which the pavement would be wide enough if private companies didn't
clutter it with their crap

99% of people might be interested in the bicycles. 1% of people might
be obstructed. They lose 99 to 1.

Hardly likely that 99% of people will be interested in cycles.

It will be a hell of a lot more than the number in chairs.

Why change the entire world for them instead of
just changing their wheelchairs? Your taxes are funding the disabled
folk.

Your not changing the entire world you are just telling people they
can't clutter up what are essentially public areas with private crap

The entire world has been ****ed over by the disabled. They think they
have the right to be able to go everywhere in their chairs.

So you want them to be second class people.

If I was disabled I'd not expect every single place in the world to be made wheelchair friendly. I'd go to the places that were.

Just as, as a vegetarian, I don't expect every restaurant to cater for me.

****ing
ramps everywhere, extra expense for all. Parking spaces marked disabled
everywhere (although they're handy as they're always empty for me to use).

Can you post a picture of you using a disabled bay without a blue badge,
please give date, time and location.

**** off grasser.

--
Her hair glistened in the rain like nose hair after a sneeze.

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:08:28 +0100, Tony Dragon wrote:

On 02-Aug-17 2:09 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 14:03:19 +0100, MrCheerful
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 13:23, soup wrote:
On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few goods
outside to encourage custom. And the council are blatantly
lying. You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a narrow
pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items filling
the
remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I tend to
think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For
****'s sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get on with
life.

..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop being "so
damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those bikes and those
cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or, heaven forbid in a
wheelchair.

or have poor or non existent eyesight

What do you think white sticks and guide dogs are for?

A guide dog walks beside the blind person, even greater width is then
required.

I'm sure it could go in front if required.

--
Corduroy pillows are making headlines!

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:13:59 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:

FLUSH the sick troll's sick ****


--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) weird sociopathic
world:
"The entire world has been ****ed over by the disabled. They think they
have the right to be able to go everywhere in their chairs. ****ing ramps
everywhere, extra expense for all. Parking spaces marked disabled
everywhere (although they're handy as they're always empty for me to use)."
MID:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:11:36 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:


You must be very fat.

Nope, 10.5 stone.

Well, then you must be VERY stupid, village idiot!

--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic "mind" in action:
"An electric fence would be less visible, and funnier to watch the kids
touching it."
MID:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:15:53 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:

A guide dog walks beside the blind person, even greater width is then
required.

I'm sure it could go in front if required.

The only thing sure here is that you are a filthy troll and idiot!

--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange
sociopathic world:
"I don't give a **** about the law".
"**** the law".
"It's only illegal is you get caught".
"Something being illegal does not matter".
"The law is irrelevant".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)

Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 6:01:34 PM UTC+1, Peeler wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:25:27 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James
Wilkinson"), the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs,
blathered again:

FLUSH most of the inevitable idiotic BLATHER

The entire world has been ****ed over by the disabled. They think
they have the right to be able to go everywhere in their chairs.
****ing ramps everywhere, extra expense for all. Parking spaces
marked disabled everywhere (although they're handy as they're
always empty for me to use).

But, but, Birdbrain: YOU are YOURSELF disabled, even if it's "only"
mentally!

And, yes, that was QUOTEWORTHY again! Thanks, little idiot!

--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) weird
sociopathic world:
"The entire world has been ****ed over by the disabled. They think
they have the right to be able to go everywhere in their chairs.
****ing ramps everywhere, extra expense for all. Parking spaces
marked disabled everywhere (although they're handy as they're always
empty for me to use)." MID:

******son Sword is a troll, stop feeding it.

He is not feeding Hucker. He taking the **** out of the worthless, sick in
the head, unemployable little lump of ****.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:07:01 +0100, Tony Dragon
wrote:
On 02-Aug-17 4:25 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:21:53 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 13:49, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:23:30 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few
goods outside to encourage custom. And the council are
blatantly lying. You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a
narrow pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items
filling the
remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I
tend to think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For
****'s
sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get on with
life.
..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop
being "so damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those
bikes and those cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or,
heaven forbid in a wheelchair.

If the wheelchair or pram can't get through where I can walk
through, it's unfit for purpose.

Bull****, a wheelchair is a lot wider than a person walking.

Then it shouldn't be.

How can a wheelchair not be wider than the person sitting in it?

Because your arse is not as wide as your shoulders/arms.

And it should be able to traverse a kerb to go
round the obstruction.

So you want them to go in the road, don't forget they have to go down
the kerb perpendicular to it, get past the obstruction, and then go
up the kerb in the same way.

And the wheels should be capable of this. How do they cope with
wheelie bins?
Besides
which the pavement would be wide enough if private companies didn't
clutter it with their crap

99% of people might be interested in the bicycles. 1% of people
might be obstructed. They lose 99 to 1.

Hardly likely that 99% of people will be interested in cycles.

It will be a hell of a lot more than the number in chairs.

Why change the entire world for them instead of
just changing their wheelchairs? Your taxes are funding the
disabled folk.

Your not changing the entire world you are just telling people
they can't clutter up what are essentially public areas with
private crap

The entire world has been ****ed over by the disabled. They think
they have the right to be able to go everywhere in their chairs.

So you want them to be second class people.

If I was disabled I'd not expect every single place in the world to
be made wheelchair friendly. I'd go to the places that were.
Just as, as a vegetarian, I don't expect every restaurant to cater
for me.
****ing
ramps everywhere, extra expense for all. Parking spaces marked
disabled everywhere (although they're handy as they're always empty
for me to use).

Can you post a picture of you using a disabled bay without a blue
badge, please give date, time and location.

**** off grasser.

Go sign on, on your nominated date, ******.
**** poor 42 year old failure. What a ****** you really are Hucker.

Tony Dragon wrote:
On 02-Aug-17 1:49 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:23:30 +0100, soup
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few
goods outside to encourage custom. And the council are
blatantly lying. You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a narrow
pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items
filling the remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I tend to
think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For
****'s sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get on
with life.

..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop being
"so damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those bikes and
those cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or, heaven
forbid in a wheelchair.

If the wheelchair or pram can't get through where I can walk through,
it's unfit for purpose. Why change the entire world for them
instead of just changing their wheelchairs? Your taxes are funding
the disabled folk.

You must be very fat.

Note how the ****** says: "Your taxes are funding the disabled folk".
Not his taxes.
This ****** will now be years in debt to the revenue and National Insurance
Contributions.
He thinks that the law does not apply to him.
Report a ******:
https://www.gov.uk/report-an-unregis...er-or-business
https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:08:28 +0100, Tony Dragon
wrote:
On 02-Aug-17 2:09 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 14:03:19 +0100, MrCheerful
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 13:23, soup wrote:
On 02/08/2017 11:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:32:08 +0100, soup wrote:
On 31/07/2017 16:01, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

The bicycle is irrelevant. Most towns have shops with a few
goods outside to encourage custom. And the council are
blatantly lying. You
can see in the first photo in the article that it isn't a
narrow pavement.
Looks pretty narrow to me.
https://postimg.org/image/l9idspecv/
See where the cars are parked, then the shops display items
filling the
remaining gap.
Yes I know this is not the aspect that has the pump, but I tend
to think
the pump was not why the council got nippy in the first
Oh those poor pedestrians having to walk round something.... For
****'s sake people need to stop being so damn pedantic and get
on with life.

..and people with pushchairs or wheelchairs have they to stop
being "so damn pedantic"? Hardly room to walk between those
bikes and those cars never mind if you are carrying shopping or,
heaven forbid in a wheelchair.

or have poor or non existent eyesight

What do you think white sticks and guide dogs are for?

A guide dog walks beside the blind person, even greater width is then
required.

I'm sure it could go in front if required.

Prick.