|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
Jose Rizal wrote in message
nk.net... Deep Freud Moors: Utter bull****. Dirt will kill bearings MUCH faster than an absence of grease. Clean dry bearings will run for a long time, dirty bearings (even when greased) will not. Don't change the subject. Grease's secondary property as water and dirt barrier is what's been pointed out, NOT whether dirt is destructive to bearings. You are the one that is trying to change the subject!!! It was originally about wheel bearings, if you can recall correctly. You avoided that last comparison because it illustrates my point rather concisely, doesn't it! Nope. You made several false statements about grease, and whether it's used for bearings or turbine rotors or gears, the primary purpose of it is lubrication. I see you skipped all the statements about grease being a lubricant, and not provided an iota of factual data about why you think otherwise. As opposed to the plethora of factual data you provided!!!! I gave a comparison which no-one is disputing. Instead you just tried to drag the topic into bike unrelated stuff, hoping to catch me out for some reason. --- DFM |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
Jose Rizal wrote in message
nk.net... Deep Freud Moors: Utter bull****. Dirt will kill bearings MUCH faster than an absence of grease. Clean dry bearings will run for a long time, dirty bearings (even when greased) will not. Don't change the subject. Grease's secondary property as water and dirt barrier is what's been pointed out, NOT whether dirt is destructive to bearings. You are the one that is trying to change the subject!!! It was originally about wheel bearings, if you can recall correctly. You avoided that last comparison because it illustrates my point rather concisely, doesn't it! Nope. You made several false statements about grease, and whether it's used for bearings or turbine rotors or gears, the primary purpose of it is lubrication. I see you skipped all the statements about grease being a lubricant, and not provided an iota of factual data about why you think otherwise. As opposed to the plethora of factual data you provided!!!! I gave a comparison which no-one is disputing. Instead you just tried to drag the topic into bike unrelated stuff, hoping to catch me out for some reason. --- DFM |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
Jose Rizal wrote in message
ink.net... Deep Freud Moors: Crikey, do I have to go back to my original statement yet again??? "The primary purpose of the grease is not lubrication, but to keep dirt and water out." Note that it says "primary", not "sole". It's still wrong, and it doesn't matter how many times you state it. The primary purpose of grease is lubrication. Educate yourself and you won't have to make up things like this. It's annoying for most of everyone of us who know better. It's annoying you because what I say stands up, and your only way of dealing with it is to try change the subject. I suggest you take some time out and do some yoga or some ****. Grease does provide somewhat of a lubricating effect, It provides more than a "somewhat" lubricating effect, it provides *all the necessary* lubrication required by the bearings. Which is somewhat of a lubricating effect, is it not? but its role of inhibiting dirt from getting into the bearings is much more important from a reliability point of view. What rubbish. Why do you make up things like this? Now folks, watch as Jose completely misinterprets what I said, and starts crapping on about something else... A secondary benefit of grease is its water repellency, not dirt repellency. WHOAH!!! Yes, folks, that was a massive leap into something unrelated! Why am I continuing with this guy? I dunno... You might think that grease prevents dirt getting into the rotating parts, but you are again wrong. Dirt is a killer in being entrained in grease, as it will eventually be carried into the moving parts. Dirt is a bearing killer whether in grease or not. Contrary to what you just said, grease provides an effective barrier against dirt when applied correctly. You've been making all these wrong claims about grease, it's time you cut your losses and go. Pretending that you're right will only delude yourself. You wont even address the point I am making, choosing to change the subject instead. --- DFM |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
Jose Rizal wrote in message
ink.net... Deep Freud Moors: Crikey, do I have to go back to my original statement yet again??? "The primary purpose of the grease is not lubrication, but to keep dirt and water out." Note that it says "primary", not "sole". It's still wrong, and it doesn't matter how many times you state it. The primary purpose of grease is lubrication. Educate yourself and you won't have to make up things like this. It's annoying for most of everyone of us who know better. It's annoying you because what I say stands up, and your only way of dealing with it is to try change the subject. I suggest you take some time out and do some yoga or some ****. Grease does provide somewhat of a lubricating effect, It provides more than a "somewhat" lubricating effect, it provides *all the necessary* lubrication required by the bearings. Which is somewhat of a lubricating effect, is it not? but its role of inhibiting dirt from getting into the bearings is much more important from a reliability point of view. What rubbish. Why do you make up things like this? Now folks, watch as Jose completely misinterprets what I said, and starts crapping on about something else... A secondary benefit of grease is its water repellency, not dirt repellency. WHOAH!!! Yes, folks, that was a massive leap into something unrelated! Why am I continuing with this guy? I dunno... You might think that grease prevents dirt getting into the rotating parts, but you are again wrong. Dirt is a killer in being entrained in grease, as it will eventually be carried into the moving parts. Dirt is a bearing killer whether in grease or not. Contrary to what you just said, grease provides an effective barrier against dirt when applied correctly. You've been making all these wrong claims about grease, it's time you cut your losses and go. Pretending that you're right will only delude yourself. You wont even address the point I am making, choosing to change the subject instead. --- DFM |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
"Deep Freud Moors" wrote
I gave a comparison which no-one is disputing. I dispute that. :-) Theo |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
cleaning fun...(not)
"Deep Freud Moors" wrote
I gave a comparison which no-one is disputing. I dispute that. :-) Theo |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Hosing a bike
Al User wrote:
Yes, but use a low pressure garden hose and try not to concentrate the stream at the hubs, bottom bracket or steerer tube. A shimano team mechanic I was talking with a few years ago said that he only ever used a bucket, a small amount of dishwashing detergent and a large soft brush (like a dustpan brush). The point was that he washed and serviced the team bikes after *every* ride, so the dirt was never caked on to a point that it had to be blasted off Al. That's what I do! Except for the part about every ride. After the wash I wipe over the bike with a rag soaked in turps then I wash it again then rinse it. For the chain I soak it in turps then rinse it then dry it with metho. -- Cheers Damian Harvey This space reserved for standard disclaimer, witty quote, plug for own business in caps and large, bad ASCII art. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Hosing a bike
Al User wrote:
Yes, but use a low pressure garden hose and try not to concentrate the stream at the hubs, bottom bracket or steerer tube. A shimano team mechanic I was talking with a few years ago said that he only ever used a bucket, a small amount of dishwashing detergent and a large soft brush (like a dustpan brush). The point was that he washed and serviced the team bikes after *every* ride, so the dirt was never caked on to a point that it had to be blasted off Al. That's what I do! Except for the part about every ride. After the wash I wipe over the bike with a rag soaked in turps then I wash it again then rinse it. For the chain I soak it in turps then rinse it then dry it with metho. -- Cheers Damian Harvey This space reserved for standard disclaimer, witty quote, plug for own business in caps and large, bad ASCII art. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Hosing a bike
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:28:55 GMT, Arpit
wrote: Is it ok to hose a bike to clean it? Not under current water restrictions if you are in Sydney. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Hosing a bike
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:28:55 GMT, Arpit
wrote: Is it ok to hose a bike to clean it? Not under current water restrictions if you are in Sydney. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Actual data for the chain cleaning debate | TBGibb | Techniques | 60 | January 11th 04 02:32 AM |
cleaning bikes in the winter | Doug Purdy | General | 25 | December 22nd 03 11:22 PM |
Steam cleaning experiment: Failure! | B. Sanders | General | 4 | August 14th 03 08:25 AM |
Yet another thread on chain cleaning | asqui | Techniques | 25 | August 1st 03 07:24 PM |