|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LeMond Croix de Fer vs Trek 2100 vs Trek 1500
I don't want to get into the "steel is real" religious wars (or maybe
I do :-)), but I am trying to narrow down my selection for my first road bike. This weekend, I testrode the 2005 LeMond Croix de Fer ($1230, http://www.lemondbikes.com/2005_bike...x_de_fer.shtml), the 2005 Trek 2100 ($1430, http://www2.trekbikes.com/Bikes/Road...2100/index.php), and the 2004 Trek 1500 ($950, http://www2.trekbikes.com/Bikes/Road...1500/index.php). So far, I have ridden a MTB, and this will be my first road bike. This is mainly for commute (~11-12 miles - mostly flat), and some recreational riding in the hills around the Bay Area, including the occasional century (done one on the MTB - decided I deserved a road bike after that experience). The LBS suggested that the 1500 would be adequate for most purposes, but on a long ride, the road vibration might get to me late in the ride. The 2100 gives a better frame (ZR9000 with carbon seat stays vs Alpha Aluminium for the 1500), and nicer components. They also said that Croix de Fer, with a steel frame, would also provide a comfortable ride, but be slightly heavier (about a couple of pounds more). I am leaning towards the Croix de Fer or Trek 2100 since the frames appear nicer, and I can upgrade components later if I wish. I think I must be fairly insensitive after so many years on a MTB that I thought all the bikes felt great on the test rides, and I couldn't feel much difference in the 3 miles or so that I rode. Any opinions? The Croix de Fer is a new bike, and so, there was nothing in http://www.roadbikereview.com. The 2005 Trek 2100 seems a significant upgrade from the 2004 (better wheels and other compnents, but same frame - about $200 more as well). Any opinions on the Shimano PD-M324 pedals (http://www.epinions.com/pr-Bike_Part..._Pedal_PD-M324). It is about 100+ gms heavier than the stock M520/M505, but gives me the option of riding with regular shoes for my commute. Thx, Atri |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Nov 2004 11:30:47 -0800, (Atri I) wrote:
I don't want to get into the "steel is real" religious wars (or maybe I do :-)), but I am trying to narrow down my selection for my first road bike. This weekend, I testrode the 2005 LeMond Croix de Fer ($1230, http://www.lemondbikes.com/2005_bike...x_de_fer.shtml), the 2005 Trek 2100 ($1430, http://www2.trekbikes.com/Bikes/Road...2100/index.php), and the 2004 Trek 1500 ($950, http://www2.trekbikes.com/Bikes/Road...1500/index.php). Any opinions? The Croix de Fer is a new bike, and so, there was nothing in http://www.roadbikereview.com. The 2005 Trek 2100 seems a significant upgrade from the 2004 (better wheels and other compnents, but same frame - about $200 more as well). Any opinions on the Shimano PD-M324 pedals (http://www.epinions.com/pr-Bike_Part..._Pedal_PD-M324). It is about 100+ gms heavier than the stock M520/M505, but gives me the option of riding with regular shoes for my commute. Thx, Atri Hi, I have a steel 2002 LeMond Tourmalet, which I am very fond of, but only you can decide which bike has the best fit and most excites your desire to ride. I upgraded everything but the fork, headset, and brake calipers, so the bike is my personal statement. Probably not the most economical way to do it, but, I did my own work, so it was fun. And now the bike screams "RIDE ME" whenever I look at it;-) I now have SPD-SL pedals on the LeMond, but the first pair of clipless pedals, that I bought were PD-M324. if you are going to use SPD and want some flexibilty, I don't think you can beat the 324s. I still use them on my older bike. Life is Good! Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Atri I" wrote in message om... Any opinions on the Shimano PD-M324 pedals (http://www.epinions.com/pr-Bike_Part...ti-Purpose_Ped al_PD-M324). It is about 100+ gms heavier than the stock M520/M505, but gives me the option of riding with regular shoes for my commute. Thx, Atri I have these on my road bike and really like them for those short trips around the neighborhood to run errands when I want to wear regular shoes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Acock wrote in message 36...
(Atri I) wrote in news:f0ac1dcc.0411221130.513e5c29 @posting.google.com: http://www.lemondbikes.com/2005_bike...x_de_fer.shtml You might consider the LeMond that has a mixture of carbon and steel. I saw one in your general price range. It was reasonably light. I didn't test ride it but was told it was great for minimizing road buzz. Which one would that be? The cheapest steel-carbon Lemond is the Versailles (http://www.lemondbikes.com/2005_bikes/versailles.shtml), which is in the $1700 range, or about $500 more than the Croix de Fer. Atri |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trek 5000 or Lemond Zurich? | Rolokid | General | 47 | July 21st 04 03:31 PM |
Old trek 2100; please advise | Brad Behm | Techniques | 10 | March 3rd 04 05:41 AM |
TREK 1500 VS CANNONDALE R600 TRIPLE | mark watkins | General | 0 | September 15th 03 11:12 PM |
LeMond v. Trek | Bob M | General | 14 | July 19th 03 06:42 PM |