Lafferty was right - Armstrong's Lawyers DO SUCK

Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...9761--spt.html

On Jul 9, 6:10*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...g-charges-1345...

Ask Lafferty to explain the meaning of "dimissed without prejudice."
DR

On Jul 9, 7:36*pm, DirtRoadie wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:10*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...g-charges-1345...

Ask Lafferty to explain the meaning of "dimissed without prejudice."
DR

No one needs Laf to explain this - the point is Armstrong's lawyers
filed a media story and not a legal brief and they were definitely
'dimissed' as you say.

On Jul 9, 8:49*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:36*pm, DirtRoadie wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:10*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...g-charges-1345....

Ask Lafferty to explain the meaning of "dimissed without prejudice."
DR

No one needs Laf to explain this - the point is Armstrong's lawyers
filed a media story and not a legal brief and they were definitely
'dimissed' as you say.

Whatever idjit lawyer signed off on that fluffer nutter filing shot
Lance in the ass. Regardless of the "without prejudice" part, there's
prejudice, and now Lance is 0-1 in filings. Most people will just
catch the dismissed part. Without the fluff it might well have been
1-0. Stupid move.

R

On Jul 9, 6:49*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:36*pm, DirtRoadie wrote:

On Jul 9, 6:10*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...g-charges-1345....

Ask Lafferty to explain the meaning of "dimissed without prejudice."
DR

No one needs Laf to explain this - the point is Armstrong's lawyers
filed a media story and not a legal brief and they were definitely
'dimissed' as you say.

Agreed. It's a media story wrapped around a legal complaint.
But you are ignoring the Court granting "leave to amend,"
i.e. excise the media part and move forward with the legal portion.
DR

On 10/07/2012 01:10, Anton Berlin wrote:
Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time


Get a ****ing life, or go and live with Raff, you can spend your empty hours
blowing each other off.

--

On 10/07/2012 01:49, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:36 pm, wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:10 pm, Anton wrote:

Sorry Lance - money won't buy you out this time

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/armstro...g-charges-1345...

Ask Lafferty to explain the meaning of "dimissed without prejudice."
DR

No one needs Laf to explain this

You do boy although the attempt would probably be a waste of time.


--