Drivers with 12 or more points still on the road

On 09/03/2012 12:13, d wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:56:41 -0800 (PST)
Simon wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:37=A0am, wrote:

Where you are going wrong here, as usual, is that the seriousness of a
crime and criminality is usually judged by its effect. Motorists can
KSI many more people during collisions than cyclists can so clearly
motorists are the worst potential criminals. Note also that cyclists
can't kill motorists during a collision but can be killed by motorists
during a collision.

Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose arguments
to.

Is the correct answer. Too much of a coward to fight it out in the open.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:56:41 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Mar 9, 7:37*am, Doug wrote:

Where you are going wrong here, as usual, is that the seriousness of a
crime and criminality is usually judged by its effect. Motorists can
KSI many more people during collisions than cyclists can so clearly
motorists are the worst potential criminals. Note also that cyclists
can't kill motorists during a collision but can be killed by motorists
during a collision.

Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.



You really must share with people how you use a kill-file when using Google
groups :-)


What a tosser.

--
Mason is in denial - he is an alcoholic.
He claims that he drinks ten to twelve pints
a night and that it does him no harm.
He needs to seek help.

On Mar 9, 12:13*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:56:41 -0800 (PST)

Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:37=A0am, Doug wrote:

Where you are going wrong here, as usual, is that the seriousness of a
crime and criminality is usually judged by its effect. Motorists can
KSI many more people during collisions than cyclists can so clearly
motorists are the worst potential criminals. Note also that cyclists
can't kill motorists during a collision but can be killed by motorists
during a collision.

Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose arguments
to.

What is a "loose argument"?
One on shaky ground?

--
Simon Mason

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:04:27 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose argume=
nts
to.

What is a "loose argument"?
One on shaky ground?

Oooh , pointing out a typo, you're debating god!

*sigh*

B2003

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:04:27 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose
argume=
nts
to.

What is a "loose argument"?
One on shaky ground?

Oooh , pointing out a typo, you're debating god!

Well, it changed the whole meaning of the statement, didn't it?

I will take the compliment though.

--
Simon Mason

On 09/03/2012 20:22, Simon Mason wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:04:27 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose argume=
nts
to.

What is a "loose argument"?
One on shaky ground?

Oooh , pointing out a typo, you're debating god!

Well, it changed the whole meaning of the statement, didn't it?

No, it didn't. Everyone knew it was a typo and you make a few of those, don't
you?) and overlooked it on that basis.

I will take the compliment though.

Don't make that mistake.

Who was it who wrote, earlier today (and I quote verbatim):

"I was most uncalled for"?

I'll give you a clue: his initials were SM.

And his name isn't Sado Masochism.

On 09/03/2012 13:47, d wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:04:27 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
Sigh - killfile him, Doug.
Numpty Nugent is just a tedious troll.
Thanks god I don't read his crap anymore.

Of course your definition of troll is someone who you always loose argume=
nts
to.

What is a "loose argument"?
One on shaky ground?

Oooh , pointing out a typo, you're debating god!

*sigh*

Typical Mason tactic.

He always loses arguments because he is a thick twunt.

It became so bad the cowardly wimp had to hide behind kill files.



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:36:21 +0000, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:



thick twunt.


t is suggested that insults involve a perpetrator, a target and, often,
an audience.



--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:43:52 +0000, Judith wrote:




What a tosser.


The intention to insult is not necessary, as some insults are the result
of misunderstanding or accident.


--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:36:21 +0000
Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
Typical Mason tactic.

He always loses arguments because he is a thick twunt.

It became so bad the cowardly wimp had to hide behind kill files.

I bet like most people who make grand gestures about kill files he never
actually uses them and just keeps reading the posts, grinding his teeth in
frustration at all the comments he can't reply to by the "killfiled" posters
until one day he can't resist any longer and suddenly he'll let rip. Of
course when you ask these people what happened to their killfile you never
get a response

B2003