Drivers with 12 or more points still on the road

On Mar 13, 8:11 am, Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 13, 6:05 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:





On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:34:30 +0000, Ian Jackson

wrote:
In message , Bertie Wooster
writes

I now take it that you are not this Ian Jackson:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/

Probably not.

Who is the absolute supremo of selfish and dangerous cycling?

Dunno. However, Simon seems to be making a concerted bid for that
position.

There was never any liklihood that Simon would undertake that car
before the junction. He'd already slowed down.

Exactly right.
I have seen so many cars turn left and right without indicating that I
have come to expect it as the default manoeuver these days and I
always make allowances for it - I was never in any danger as I knew
what he was going to do.

I have a good clip from this morning where a driver nearly hit me as
he went the wrong way around a mini roundabout. I will post it to all
three groups at around 1630 when I get home. I have already edited it
here at work.


It seems to have attracted a lot of interest already.
Those glasses have been a good investment.

--
Simon Mason

"Corporal Jones" wrote in message ...

On 16/03/2012 11:19, Mr Benn wrote:
"Corporal Jones" wrote in message
...
On 16/03/2012 10:08, Mr Benn wrote:

"Corporal Jones" wrote in message
...
On 08/03/2012 09:15, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
On 03/03/2012 08:48, Bertie Wooster wrote:
ALL ROAD USERS BEWARE!

Especially those in Hull.

Simon is a martyr to the cause, He has a death wish which he will no
doubt experience in the near future, me I have no sympathy for his type
of cycling, he will get what is coming to him at some point, just like
the cyclist who ran down and killed my brother.

A cyclist killed your brother? How did that happen?

He was walking down a country lane, hit by a cyclist, fell over and hit
his head against a wall, life support turned of 4 weeks later, he was 60.

Very sorry to hear that. Was the cyclist held liable?

The cyclist got away scot free.
========================================

Incredible. The cyclist was going too fast to stop in time from the sound
of it. No excuse at all.

On Mar 16, 8:06*pm, "Simon Mason"
wrote:
On Mar 13, 8:11 am, Simon Mason wrote:





On Mar 13, 6:05 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:34:30 +0000, Ian Jackson

wrote:
In message , Bertie Wooster
writes

I now take it that you are not this Ian Jackson:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/

Probably not.

Who is the absolute supremo of selfish and dangerous cycling?

Dunno. However, Simon seems to be making a concerted bid for that
position.

There was never any liklihood that Simon would undertake that car
before the junction. He'd already slowed down.

Exactly right.
I have seen so many cars turn left and right without indicating that I
have come to expect it as the default manoeuver these days and I
always make allowances for it - I was never in any danger as I knew
what he was going to do.

I have a good clip from this morning where a driver nearly hit me as
he went the wrong way around a mini roundabout. I will post it to all
three groups at around 1630 when I get home. I have already edited it
here at work.

It seems to have attracted a lot of interest already.
Those glasses have been a good investment.

--
Simon Mason- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Tell them I sent you :-)

I could do with a spare pair.

http://www.zetronix.com/8GB-High-Res...ptmpf9aicv0 0

--
Simon Mason

Phil W Lee writes:

Given pretty well every cyclist commits traffic offences many
times a day,

Incorrect.

Assertion /= fact.

I'm obviously just speaking for the ones I see. Those that don't go
through red traffic lights or ride on the pavement etc are so rare
they can safely be ignored, percentage wise.

Still incorrect.

Assertion != fact.

To be fair, it might just be that he doesn't `see' the ones not
committing offences.

--
Mark