|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:21:52 AM UTC-4, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 6, 2014 2:36:15 PM UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, October 6, 2014 9:23:07 AM UTC-4, Andre Jute wrote: On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:17:04 PM UTC+1, wrote: Yo, Daniels, I'm used to Google offering me translations of what you fondly believe to be English, but I don't even get this question: "WHY are cyclists riding at Night ?" Surely the question is, Why not? nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ah no. Question is why is the Dyno Group riding at night ? The dyno isn't the motivator here, it is merely a mechanism that makes night riding convenient whenever one wants to ride at night. If your implication is that only batteries are natural, that's more supine fashion-self-victimization by cyclists and particularly roadies; you don't see it outside the anglophone-japanese-roadie nexus. Clearly, one escapes into the night. But why ? Or does not 'escape' into the night. "Escapes"? Really? You're a psychologist now?. Kinda like the experiential problem of equating statistics to potential danger. There are perspectives from Ohio, from LA. You know what I think of "perspectives from Ohio" -- they're a superior guideline to possibibilites you want to reject out of hand because their source and his logic and morality and statistical "skills" are all severely tainted. Obviously night riding is not as safe as day riding Nothing obvious about it at all. If motorists are the chief danger, rather than the road itself, then empty roads are safer. If the road itself is the chief danger, then good lamps or slowing down can mitigate or remove the extra danger. My own experience is that if I don't respect the road, I fall off sooner or later, regardless of whether it is daylight or nighttime. but for some, more comfortable. Comfort is not safety..surely not in potential. Crap, and crap again. People who aren't comforatble are easily distracted, and in the extreme can do stupid things out of fear. ( is dyno riding safer than battery riding ? ) It's not an argument I made. I simply said it is more convenient. But it must be safer because batteries can run out of juice in the middle of a ride, whereas dynamos rarely break. https://www.google.com/#q=bicycle+st...n+ day+riding What's this, another of your compendium Google searches loaded with lay opinion not worth the time to read? You've been told again and again, give us a single authoritative source, and we might pay attention. you're prob with reading my writing is your skills lack quality. Nope. I'm a distinguished writer and teacher of writing ("Jute is a godsend" -- The Times, London, on one of my writing handbooks). My problem with you is that you're a smart arse who thinks he knows better than everyone who speaks and writes decent English. You don't. That garbage you spew doesn't make you clever, it makes incomprehensible. In English there is no greater sin. Andre Jute Strunk wants you RRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.... wow amazing posturing of paranoid right wing Euro elitism.... |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/6/2014 8:15 PM, Duane wrote: Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/6/2014 6:01 PM, Duane wrote: wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:23:57 -0400, Duane wrote: I wouldn't buy a dynamo either... Even if it was a $15 option???? I would in a heartbeat at that kind of price!! Probably not. I don't have a need for any serious lighting. I'm sure there are those that do and would appreciate that. Yes, very few North Americans think they have no need for any serious lighting on a bicycle. After all, they'd say, it's not a serious vehicle, is it? To them, it's either a garage decoration or a fair weather toy. You're putting words in my mouth again. So you plan to endlessly quote me as saying that as well? First the "fabricate a bike rack" thing, and now this?? Good grief, Duane, turn on your reading comprehension! Did I say "Duane says his bike is not a serious vehicle"? NO! I said that most North Americans would say that - which is true! Most bikes in NA sit in garages full time, or get brief exercise only on the prettiest days. You replied directly to me with your spiel. Most North American cyclists that I know would tell you that you have no idea what most North Americans would say. However, you _did_ say you have no need for any serious lighting. If it offends you greatly that I noticed that, perhaps you should have kept it to yourself. And perhaps you should go **** your supercilious self. -- duane |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
cheapo deal ? incroyable
the phrase is 'back light'.... checked with Cateye maybe find a percentage night riding stat but no lighting specs.. http://goo.gl/K6Xijw I found I was in a dynamo perspective wondering if Cateye's were current or had cycling moved on to cell phone apps leaving Cateye's behind...maybe for skiing in Russia ? Frank, izzat true...$400 ? Andy, is a $400 plateau device have demographic bearing in cycling ? Holy Cow |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On 10/6/2014 5:15 PM, Duane wrote:
You're as arrogant as you are annoying.. Some cycling advocate you are when you demean what you claim is the vast majority of cyclists in your country. Some of us actually do stuff to promote cycling. For example, the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition does a lot of secure bicycle valet parking at events. We just started providing bicycle parking at the new Levi's football stadium. I think as fans realize that there's an excellent multi-use trail adjacent to the stadium and that they'll save about two hours of time per game, bicycle use will increase. We just need to find a way to have tailgate parties on bicycles. We will also educate them about lighting if they are interested. The key thing is to address the concerns people have in a respectful manner. You don't want to be insulting or berating them. But maybe it's that I live in an area where most people are pretty well educated and would not fall for Frank's schtick, in fact the number that would fall for it is vanishingly small. I've lived here so long that I forget that things may be different in places like Appalachia. I Please do not ever suggest that our favorite troll is a bicycle advocate. If he takes the positions in real life that he does on r.b.t. then he's working as hard as he can to discourage cycling. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
sms wrote:
On 10/6/2014 5:15 PM, Duane wrote: You're as arrogant as you are annoying.. Some cycling advocate you are when you demean what you claim is the vast majority of cyclists in your country. Some of us actually do stuff to promote cycling. For example, the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition does a lot of secure bicycle valet parking at events. We just started providing bicycle parking at the new Levi's football stadium. I think as fans realize that there's an excellent multi-use trail adjacent to the stadium and that they'll save about two hours of time per game, bicycle use will increase. We just need to find a way to have tailgate parties on bicycles. We will also educate them about lighting if they are interested. The key thing is to address the concerns people have in a respectful manner. You don't want to be insulting or berating them. But maybe it's that I live in an area where most people are pretty well educated and would not fall for Frank's schtick, in fact the number that would fall for it is vanishingly small. I've lived here so long that I forget that things may be different in places like Appalachia. I Please do not ever suggest that our favorite troll is a bicycle advocate. If he takes the positions in real life that he does on r.b.t. then he's working as hard as he can to discourage cycling. I don't for a second think that Frank advocates anything other than Frank's imagined superiority. His attempt to bully Joerg just ****ed me off. He's run off enough people with his crap. Anyway he's back in my kill file. I apologize for the wasted bandwidth. -- duane |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On 07/10/14 11:10, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
Practical varies amongst people. For me practical is a decent battery powered light that I can use on any of my bikes whenever I want. A dynamo isn't pratical if it's on one bike but I want to use a different bike that night. I've had my Rover II for many years now and have never had it malfunction nor die on even multi-hours long night rides. I built one front wheel with a dynamo hub. It fits both my road bikes. It takes a few minutes to move the front wheel and light from one bike to another. I don't need to move it very often anyway, I never need to charge it, and it's always capable of producing power to the light, so it seems practical to me. It wouldn't bother me in the least to build a wheel specifically for my mountain bike, and I'd probably want a dual light setup for on-road/off-road lighting. (I'm toying with the idea of a dual light mount so I can get the high/low beam solution that Jay has asked for. It'd be nice for twisting descents at speed at night.) What's impractical to me is a light that only lasts a few hours, needs recharging after every ride (3-4 times a week for me), and has a flimsy quick release mount that I've seen fall apart on other's bikes. Even my Garmin bike computer can operate, drive it's backlight and store data for much longer than most rechargeable lights on the market. -- JS |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On Monday, October 6, 2014 9:33:51 PM UTC-4, sms wrote:
On 10/6/2014 5:15 PM, Duane wrote: You're as arrogant as you are annoying.. Some cycling advocate you are when you demean what you claim is the vast majority of cyclists in your country. Some of us actually do stuff to promote cycling. For example, the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition does a lot of secure bicycle valet parking at events. We just started providing bicycle parking at the new Levi's football stadium. I think as fans realize that there's an excellent multi-use trail adjacent to the stadium and that they'll save about two hours of time per game, bicycle use will increase. We just need to find a way to have tailgate parties on bicycles. We will also educate them about lighting if they are interested. The key thing is to address the concerns people have in a respectful manner. You don't want to be insulting or berating them. But maybe it's that I live in an area where most people are pretty well educated and would not fall for Frank's schtick, in fact the number that would fall for it is vanishingly small. I've lived here so long that I forget that things may be different in places like Appalachia. I Please do not ever suggest that our favorite troll is a bicycle advocate. If he takes the positions in real life that he does on r.b.t. then he's working as hard as he can to discourage cycling. protected parking ? yawl egalitarians need protected parking ? goons roaming the lot ? in on a bus from Appalachia ? no kidding ? Looking for action ? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
James wrote:
On 07/10/14 11:10, Sir Ridesalot wrote: Practical varies amongst people. For me practical is a decent battery powered light that I can use on any of my bikes whenever I want. A dynamo isn't pratical if it's on one bike but I want to use a different bike that night. I've had my Rover II for many years now and have never had it malfunction nor die on even multi-hours long night rides. I built one front wheel with a dynamo hub. It fits both my road bikes. It takes a few minutes to move the front wheel and light from one bike to another. I don't need to move it very often anyway, I never need to charge it, and it's always capable of producing power to the light, so it seems practical to me. It wouldn't bother me in the least to build a wheel specifically for my mountain bike, and I'd probably want a dual light setup for on-road/off-road lighting. (I'm toying with the idea of a dual light mount so I can get the high/low beam solution that Jay has asked for. It'd be nice for twisting descents at speed at night.) What's impractical to me is a light that only lasts a few hours, needs recharging after every ride (3-4 times a week for me), and has a flimsy quick release mount that I've seen fall apart on other's bikes. Even my Garmin bike computer can operate, drive it's backlight and store data for much longer than most rechargeable lights on the market. Most of my riding in the dark consists of the first and last hour of my commute this time of year. To charge the fleas at my desk during work. I'm mostly on well lit flat roads so they're fine. Practical is a matter of opinion. -- duane |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On 07/10/14 12:22, Duane wrote:
And perhaps you should go **** your supercilious self. Channelling Dan O these days? -- JS |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
WHY are cyclists riding at night ?
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:05:31 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote: On Monday, October 6, 2014 7:38:30 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/6/2014 6:01 PM, Duane wrote: wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:23:57 -0400, Duane wrote: I wouldn't buy a dynamo either... Even if it was a $15 option???? I would in a heartbeat at that kind of price!! Probably not. I don't have a need for any serious lighting. I'm sure there are those that do and would appreciate that. Yes, very few North Americans think they have no need for any serious lighting on a bicycle. After all, they'd say, it's not a serious vehicle, is it? To them, it's either a garage decoration or a fair weather toy. The more practical use one gets out of a bike, the more sense a dynamo makes. Obviously, levels of practical use vary tremendously, with the statistical mode being zero for North Americans. -- - Frank Krygowski In fair weather at night I see many "serious" bicycle commuters/riders who wear dark colour clothing, have no reflectors or lights of any kind and who often seem to just appear on the dark section of the road as if they've popped in via a time warp or some portal. It can be quite startling to tthe rider who nearly hits them. What gets me is that here in Ontario it's illegal to ride s bicycle at night without at least reflectors if not lights. Then again it's also illegal to sell a bicycle that doesn't have reflectors. Plus, it's also illegal to ride a bicycle that doesn't have brakes. The peoblem seems to be that the laws aren't enforced anyway unless the cop is in a bad mood. Cheers They can't (or won't) even take the chinese-engined gasoline-powered almost mopeds off the road. (whizzer replica motors strapped to a cheap bicycle) Last I heard, if the cop really wanted to make an example of someone, or be a prick , or even just do his job there is about $8000 of fines available to be applied for driving an unfit, unlicenced, uninsured motorcycle without a motorcycle licence and without a proper (if any) helmet, usually at over the speed limit for a limited speed motorcycle. Add driving while suspended for DUI (many ride these deathtraps when they lose their car licence) and it can go even higher. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Night riding | The Bruiser | Unicycling | 20 | November 4th 06 09:22 AM |
Night riding | tedward | Unicycling | 2 | May 14th 06 11:43 AM |
Riding at Night | Tim Nunes | General | 14 | January 21st 06 03:16 AM |
Night riding. | Callistus Valerius | Racing | 26 | February 22nd 05 01:13 AM |
Night riding... | Absent Husband | Australia | 67 | January 16th 05 08:44 PM |