I was misled

Mark Hickey wrote:

wrote:


http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1310344&l=43371


Yep, it's still misleading all right.

The story says that Ridge says we're now compliant.

The GAO says last report they did we weren't yet.

They try to twist that to make you think the GAO report contradicts
Ridge....

I believe that Ridge meant to say, "firm, yet compliant".

--
Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

Tom Sherman wrote:
andres muro wrote:

...I do spell like a nincaupoop
and I am not sure how to do a spell check aside from copying and
pasting the entire text in Word and then repasting it here...

And what exactly is the problem with doing that? I have posted a few
thousand messages to Usenet that were spell checked with a word
processor.

If Andres has Word, why would he have to do that? Tools, Options, Spelling,
check box, presto.

Bill "word" S.

Mark Hickey writes:

(Jonesy) wrote:

Even if I were to let you have the point that Rush is somehow a
"source of news," you'd still find some way to weasel out of
logically defending your commentary on torture.

LMAO.

Keep going - some day you'll get it. Or not.

He'll someday get what?

More interesting reading material for the misled:

http://www.house.gov/reform/min/politicsandscience/

Tim McNamara wrote:
Mark Hickey writes:

(Jonesy) wrote:

Even if I were to let you have the point that Rush is somehow a
"source of news," you'd still find some way to weasel out of
logically defending your commentary on torture.

LMAO.

Keep going - some day you'll get it. Or not.

He'll someday get what?

That Mark never said Rush was a legitimate "source of news".

Bill "context, context, context" S.

"S o r n i" wrote in message .. .
Tom Sherman wrote:
andres muro wrote:

...I do spell like a nincaupoop
and I am not sure how to do a spell check aside from copying and
pasting the entire text in Word and then repasting it here...

And what exactly is the problem with doing that? I have posted a few
thousand messages to Usenet that were spell checked with a word
processor.

If Andres has Word, why would he have to do that? Tools, Options, Spelling,
check box, presto.

Bill "word" S.

Tom's idea is too hard for me. I only do it when I am trying to
impress someone or to make a point. For cathartic exercises, I don't
care that much.
Regardign your idea bill, I don't have a tool icon w/spell check. I am
posting from Google groups. The icons that I have in my tool bars are
the internet explorer icons.

Andres

Tom Sherman wrote:

Mark Hickey wrote:

wrote:


http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1310344&l=43371


Yep, it's still misleading all right.

The story says that Ridge says we're now compliant.

The GAO says last report they did we weren't yet.

They try to twist that to make you think the GAO report contradicts
Ridge....

I believe that Ridge meant to say, "firm, yet compliant".

From a polititian (or most bicycle marketing departments), that's
about as good as it gets... ;-)

Mark Hickey
Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com
Home of the $695 ti frame

"S o r n i" wrote:

Tim McNamara wrote:
Mark Hickey writes:

(Jonesy) wrote:

Even if I were to let you have the point that Rush is somehow a
"source of news," you'd still find some way to weasel out of
logically defending your commentary on torture.

LMAO.

Keep going - some day you'll get it. Or not.

He'll someday get what?

That Mark never said Rush was a legitimate "source of news".

Bill "context, context, context" S.

Y'know, this may come as news to Jonesy, but I have some bad news for
him. I don't think he knows what "news" means... (I suggest
www.dictionary.com for a starting place...

Mark Hickey
Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com
Home of the $695 ti frame

"S o r n i" writes:

Tim McNamara wrote:
Mark Hickey writes:

(Jonesy) wrote:

Even if I were to let you have the point that Rush is somehow a
"source of news," you'd still find some way to weasel out of
logically defending your commentary on torture.

LMAO.

Keep going - some day you'll get it. Or not.

He'll someday get what?

That Mark never said Rush was a legitimate "source of news".

Ah. I agree with Mark, then, that Rush is not a legitmate source of
news.

andres muro wrote:
...I do spell like a nincaupoop
and I am not sure how to do a spell check aside from copying and
pasting the entire text in Word and then repasting it here...

Tom Sherman wrote:
And what exactly is the problem with doing that? I have posted a few
thousand messages to Usenet that were spell checked with a word
processor.

S o r n i wrote:
If Andres has Word, why would he have to do that? Tools, Options, Spelling,
check box, presto.
Bill "word" S.

yeah, but Edlin is so less cluttered.

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971