Johnny NoCom or Osama? Time to vote!

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

Ed,

When you start following the conduct recommend by GOOGLE for this
group, then you can lecture me. I sent the recommended posting
etitquette to you off line to your email on two separate occasions.

You said: "We should not be proliferating threads for no reason."
If
only you meant it.

I do not proliferate threads. I am strictly a responder. If I started

posting original threads I would totally ruin this newsgroup, so that
is why
I do not do it. I would be even worse that Johnny NoCom.

I note that Mr. Sherman is also strictly a responder. So I feel like
I am in
good company.

--
Regards,


Ed Dolan - Minnesota


Ah Ed,

As Larry would say: "Again caught in your web", so to speak.

Lookee Ed:

Le Dictionary:

pro=B7lif=B7er=B7ate ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pr-lf-rt)
v=2E pro=B7lif=B7er=B7at=B7ed, pro=B7lif=B7er=B7at=B7ing, pro=B7lif=B7er=B7=
ates
v=2E intr.
To increase or spread at a rapid rate: fears that nuclear weapons might
proliferate.

Le Thesaurus:

Entry: proliferate
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: increase
Synonyms: breed, burgeon, engender, escalate, expand, generate, grow
rapidly, multiply, mushroom, procreate, propagate, reproduce, run riot,
snowball
Source: Roget's New Millennium=99 Thesaurus, First Edition (v 1.1.1)
Copyright =A9 2005 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC. All rights reserved.


Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage left. Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.
Cheers

Slow Joe

wrote in message
oups.com...
[...]

Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage left. Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.

Edward Dolan wrote:

No, Joe, I do not proliferate threads. Neither does Mr. Sherman. My posts
stay within the thread to which I am posting. It is ALWAYS others who enter
a new subject heading and thereby proliferate the thread. If you will look
up the number of original posts of mine you will see they are practically
nil. That is also true of Mr. Sherman. Both Mr. Sherman and I have
profligate minds that can attach to anything that is being said on any
subject. That is why we do not need to post an original message, thereby
starting a new thread.

By the way, your newsreader (Google?) is not indicating who is saying what.
Frankly, I am too lazy to make the necessary corrections, other than to
indicate what I am saying in this post.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
[...]

Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate
threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't
resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage left.
Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.

Edward Dolan wrote:

No, Joe, I do not proliferate threads. Neither does Mr. Sherman. My
posts
stay within the thread to which I am posting. It is ALWAYS others who
enter
a new subject heading and thereby proliferate the thread.

You and your son Tom proliferate the thread within the branch. Many
times you have responded to a thread in your negative manner thereby
causing the thread to branch into a discussion that had nothing to do
the the thought the writer was trying to convey. The thread then
multiplies. It is because of mainly you and your son that ARBR is a
shell of what it once was.

Do you understand what the term "proliferate" means and the various
ways it can be applied? If you continue to deny that you "proliferate"
what does that make you? A liar? Ignorant? Both?

Enjoy,

Perry B

wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
[...]

Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate
threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't
resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage left.
Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.

Edward Dolan wrote:

No, Joe, I do not proliferate threads. Neither does Mr. Sherman. My
posts
stay within the thread to which I am posting. It is ALWAYS others who
enter
a new subject heading and thereby proliferate the thread.

You and your son Tom proliferate the thread within the branch. Many
times you have responded to a thread in your negative manner thereby
causing the thread to branch into a discussion that had nothing to do
the the thought the writer was trying to convey. The thread then
multiplies. It is because of mainly you and your son that ARBR is a
shell of what it once was.

As long as the messages stay within the thread, there is no proliferation
going on. My negative manner is what gives some life to this newsgroup. Note
well this past week where the group has died and gone to hell. Only
controversy keeps the group alive. The ONLY sin on a newsgroup is to be
deadly dull, something of which you are constantly guilty. If you want to
die, then go somewhere else and die by yourself.

If and when the thread multiplies, that is due to others starting a new
thread. I NEVER do that! Mr. Sherman will occasionally do that because he
believes the subject has wandered. My policy is never to start a new thread.
I will stay on the same old thread until hell freezes over.

ARBR is far better now that it ever was before. Even when it has become as
dull as hell due to jerks like you, it is still better than it was when all
those g.d. liberals were posting their nonsense.

Do you understand what the term "proliferate" means and the various
ways it can be applied? If you continue to deny that you "proliferate"
what does that make you? A liar? Ignorant? Both?

For Christ's sake, don't you ever get tired of calling other liars? I DO NOT
PROLIFERATE THREADS, YOU G.D. JERK! Others proliferate the thread and then I
respond to whatever they have posted regardless of the thread. OTHERS are
proliferating the thread, NOT ME!

Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

PS. By the way, when Mr. Tom Sherman stops posting to this newsgroup it
quickly goes to hell. That is because his posts are intelligent and lively
and he is helpful with information to newbies and sophisticates alike. That
is more than can be said for you.

Both!

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
[...]

Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate
threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't
resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage
left.
Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.

Edward Dolan wrote:

No, Joe, I do not proliferate threads. Neither does Mr. Sherman.
My
posts
stay within the thread to which I am posting. It is ALWAYS others
who
enter
a new subject heading and thereby proliferate the thread.

You and your son Tom proliferate the thread within the branch.
Many
times you have responded to a thread in your negative manner
thereby
causing the thread to branch into a discussion that had nothing to
do
the the thought the writer was trying to convey. The thread then
multiplies. It is because of mainly you and your son that ARBR is
a
shell of what it once was.

As long as the messages stay within the thread, there is no
proliferation
going on. My negative manner is what gives some life to this
newsgroup.

Your negative manner has killed this newsgroup!



Note
well this past week where the group has died and gone to hell.

Your continuous off-recumbent, negative attacks is one of the reasons
this recumbent group has "died and gone to hell."



Only
controversy keeps the group alive.

Non-recumbent controversy killed this group!



The ONLY sin on a newsgroup is to be
deadly dull, something of which you are constantly guilty.

I'll start being interesting as soon as this group gets back to
recumbents!



If you want to
die, then go somewhere else and die by yourself.

I'll leave "die by yourself" to you, you lonely old man!



If and when the thread multiplies, that is due to others starting a
new
thread. I NEVER do that! Mr. Sherman will occasionally do that
because he
believes the subject has wandered. My policy is never to start a new
thread.
I will stay on the same old thread until hell freezes over.

A few months ago you started a thread about me! So much for "I NEVER
do that!" I guess this is another instance where you are a liar!




ARBR is far better now that it ever was before.

This is a Usenet group about recumbents. I would estimate less than 5%
of your responses are about recumbents. You are violating Usnet
policy! You don't understand what Usenet is about!


Even when it has become as
dull as hell due to jerks like you, it is still better than it was
when all
those g.d. liberals were posting their nonsense.

The people who talked recumbent talk have left this group because of
you, Tommy and others who constantly refuse to talk recumbents! I know
if we took a poll of all the people who have left ARBR in the past two
years and those still here you would be the "jerk."





Do you understand what the term "proliferate" means and the various
ways it can be applied? If you continue to deny that you
"proliferate"
what does that make you? A liar? Ignorant? Both?

For Christ's sake, don't you ever get tired of calling other liars? I
DO NOT
PROLIFERATE THREADS, YOU G.D. JERK! Others proliferate the thread and
then I
respond to whatever they have posted regardless of the thread. OTHERS
are
proliferating the thread, NOT ME!

You proliferate threads. Look at all the threads with the words Ed
Dolan in the subject line. These were created because of you. In
addition, look at all the non-recumbent responses you have written
yourself!

You DO PROLIFERATE THREADS!

Your lack of understanding is why you can be defined as ignorant!



PS. By the way, when Mr. Tom Sherman stops posting to this newsgroup
it
quickly goes to hell. That is because his posts are intelligent and
lively
and he is helpful with information to newbies and sophisticates
alike. That
is more than can be said for you.

I'll agree that Tom can be an excellent writer. Unfortunately, Toms
non-recumbent activity is a mirror image of yours. Tom can be short
and concise, whereby your responses are best described as massive
diarrhea!

You need to look up my posts when ARBR was about recumbents before you
make these statements. This also shows your ignorance!
Enjoy,

Perry B.

wrote in message
ups.com...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

Both!

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
[...]

Last I checked,increase doesn't mean start. You do proliferate
threads
Ed as in escalate, expand, mushroom, and of course snowball. Then
again, I'd expect a flake to expand into a snowball. couldn't
resist

And now I'm guilty of the same proliferation. Exiting, stage
left.
Or
in your case, I'd better make that to the right.

Edward Dolan wrote:

No, Joe, I do not proliferate threads. Neither does Mr. Sherman.
My
posts
stay within the thread to which I am posting. It is ALWAYS others
who
enter
a new subject heading and thereby proliferate the thread.

You and your son Tom proliferate the thread within the branch.
Many
times you have responded to a thread in your negative manner
thereby
causing the thread to branch into a discussion that had nothing to
do
the the thought the writer was trying to convey. The thread then
multiplies. It is because of mainly you and your son that ARBR is
a
shell of what it once was.

As long as the messages stay within the thread, there is no
proliferation
going on. My negative manner is what gives some life to this
newsgroup.

Your negative manner has killed this newsgroup!

It is numskulls and morons like you that bring out my negative manner. I
have no patience for fools. I for one am delighted that Cetus Lee and all
those other pompous idiots (many from Florida) have left this group. They
were not only pompous, but they were boring besides. Good riddance.

Note
well this past week where the group has died and gone to hell.

Your continuous off-recumbent, negative attacks is one of the reasons
this recumbent group has "died and gone to hell."

This group only dies when Mr. Sheman leaves us. You have always been a
non-entity here and you always will be because you lack brain power. You are
only good for spite.

Only
controversy keeps the group alive.

Non-recumbent controversy killed this group!

Utter nonsense!

The ONLY sin on a newsgroup is to be
deadly dull, something of which you are constantly guilty.

I'll start being interesting as soon as this group gets back to
recumbents!

You were never interesting and you never will be. You are only good for
spite. Or did I already say that.

If you want to
die, then go somewhere else and die by yourself.

I'll leave "die by yourself" to you, you lonely old man!

I love being alone, but I am never lonely. Try to figure that one out with
your limited brain power if you can.

If and when the thread multiplies, that is due to others starting a
new
thread. I NEVER do that! Mr. Sherman will occasionally do that
because he
believes the subject has wandered. My policy is never to start a new
thread.
I will stay on the same old thread until hell freezes over.

A few months ago you started a thread about me! So much for "I NEVER
do that!" I guess this is another instance where you are a liar!

I once started one thread? So sue me!

But weren't you the jerk who looked me up on the web to see where I was at
and then posted that information to the group. You are just too jerky and
nerdy for words!

ARBR is far better now that it ever was before.

This is a Usenet group about recumbents. I would estimate less than 5%
of your responses are about recumbents. You are violating Usnet
policy! You don't understand what Usenet is about!

I understand it is not about being dull and boring - which is all you are
ever good for. Why the hell don't you go to BROL and stay there if you want
to be on topic all the time?

Even when it has become as
dull as hell due to jerks like you, it is still better than it was
when all
those g.d. liberals were posting their nonsense.

The people who talked recumbent talk have left this group because of
you, Tommy and others who constantly refuse to talk recumbents! I know
if we took a poll of all the people who have left ARBR in the past two
years and those still here you would be the "jerk."

Those assholes who have left this group were all a bunch of dirty rotten
liberals who were always posting their g.d. political nonsense here. Good
riddance to the lot of them - or did I already say that once or twice.

Do you understand what the term "proliferate" means and the various
ways it can be applied? If you continue to deny that you
"proliferate"
what does that make you? A liar? Ignorant? Both?

For Christ's sake, don't you ever get tired of calling other liars? I
DO NOT
PROLIFERATE THREADS, YOU G.D. JERK! Others proliferate the thread and
then I
respond to whatever they have posted regardless of the thread. OTHERS
are
proliferating the thread, NOT ME!

You proliferate threads. Look at all the threads with the words Ed
Dolan in the subject line. These were created because of you. In
addition, look at all the non-recumbent responses you have written
yourself!

You DO PROLIFERATE THREADS!

Your lack of understanding is why you can be defined as ignorant!

If threads are created because of me, then that is to my credit. I did not
and do not create them. But I shall of course respond to whatever is posted
regardless of the subject thread. But please note that I do not create new
threads. I cannot be responsible for what others decided to do with my posts
to the group. That is out of my hands.

PS. By the way, when Mr. Tom Sherman stops posting to this newsgroup
it
quickly goes to hell. That is because his posts are intelligent and
lively
and he is helpful with information to newbies and sophisticates
alike. That
is more than can be said for you.

I'll agree that Tom can be an excellent writer. Unfortunately, Toms
non-recumbent activity is a mirror image of yours. Tom can be short
and concise, whereby your responses are best described as massive
diarrhea!

I do not post long messages. In fact, my posts are exactly the right length,
consisting of at most two or three medium length paragraphs. I do not post
single sentences as that is the hallmark of an idiot. Most who post like
that are concise to the point of not making any sense at all. If you only
have a single sentence or two worth to say, then you do not have enough to
say to make it worthwhile for anyone to bother reading it. Mark Leuck is the
worst offender in the universe on this score. He needs to be taken out to
the wood shed and given a good beating about his fat head or his fat butt -
as I am not sure where his brain is located.

You need to look up my posts when ARBR was about recumbents before you
make these statements. This also shows your ignorance!

I think I have been here about 2 years now. What do you expect me to do, go
back and look up **** here on this newsgroup? Perish the thought!

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:

This group only dies when Mr. Sheman leaves us.

That's because mainly you and Tom have driven them off!



Non-recumbent controversy killed this group!

Utter nonsense!

You don't understand what Usenet and ARBR stand for. This shows your
ignorance!



You were never interesting and you never will be.

At least I'm not a lonely, negative old man!




If you want to
die, then go somewhere else and die by yourself.

I'll leave "die by yourself" to you, you lonely old man!

I love being alone, but I am never lonely. Try to figure that one out
with
your limited brain power if you can.

It's easy! No one wants to be with you! This is something people like
you never understand. It's called denial!




If and when the thread multiplies, that is due to others starting
a
new
thread. I NEVER do that! Mr. Sherman will occasionally do that
because he
believes the subject has wandered. My policy is never to start a
new
thread.
I will stay on the same old thread until hell freezes over.

A few months ago you started a thread about me! So much for "I
NEVER
do that!" I guess this is another instance where you are a liar!

I once started one thread? So sue me!

You have started more than one thread. Do you understand what the word
"NEVER" means, especially when you write it in CAPS? Poor use of the
English language.



But weren't you the jerk who looked me up on the web to see where I
was at
and then posted that information to the group. You are just too jerky
and
nerdy for words!

I didn't look you up on the Internet. You e-mailed me and told me you
were from Worthington. This is the second time you have brought this
up. Are you senile?




ARBR is far better now that it ever was before.

This is a Usenet group about recumbents. I would estimate less
than 5%
of your responses are about recumbents. You are violating Usnet
policy! You don't understand what Usenet is about!

I understand it is not about being dull and boring - which is all you
are
ever good for. Why the hell don't you go to BROL and stay there if
you want
to be on topic all the time?

Why don't you go to a political discussion group? At least then you
would meet Usenet policy. This is a group for recumbents.

Those assholes who have left this group were all a bunch of dirty
rotten
liberals who were always posting their g.d. political nonsense here.

They left because of the lack of recumbent talk! Replace the word
"liberals" and you are talking about you!



I do not post long messages.

Liar!



I do not post
single sentences as that is the hallmark of an idiot. Most who post
like
that are concise to the point of not making any sense at all.

Tom doesn't make any sense? Tom posts this way all the time.




You need to look up my posts when ARBR was about recumbents before
you
make these statements. This also shows your ignorance!

I think I have been here about 2 years now. What do you expect me to
do, go
back and look up **** here on this newsgroup? Perish the thought!

Then you shouldn't have made the statement. Didn't they teach you
anything in college? Don't you know how to research? Don't you know
how to write? Please at least base your statements on fact! Anyone
can write fiction. You've proved that!


Enjoy,

Perry B

wrote in message
ups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:

This group only dies when Mr. Sheman leaves us.

That's because mainly you and Tom have driven them off!

No, I took note of this phenomenon long before I began to post to the group.

But how is it possible to drive anyone off of a newsgroup? Those who leave
leave of their own volition. Someday I will leave this group too and it will
have absolutely nothing to do with what anyone is saying or not saying. I
will simply leave because I have lost interest. Surely that is how it works
for everyone.

A newsgroup, as Jon Meinecke never tires of telling us, is what everyone
makes of it. If you want to read interesting messages about recumbents, then
write some interesting messages about recumbents. If they are interesting
enough, I will read them and I may even respond to them. Some of you want to
be entertained by others without contributing anything yourself. A newsgroup
does not work like that. A newsgroup is what YOU make of it, not someone
else.

Perry's post here is a prime example of what is wrong with this group. All
he knows how to do is to spite me - which must be extremely boring to
everyone else here. This has all been hashed over so frequently in the past
that even I am tiring of it. The only thing about any of this that makes any
sense to me is that he is jealous of me. But why should he care? We are all
strangers here to one another and I assure you, one and all, that I don't
give a damn about any of you, at least not on a personal level. I most
especially don't give a damn about Perry Butler, whoever the hell he is!

Perry professes a concern for the health of the group and then goes on post
after post to accuse Mr. Sherman and I of wrecking the group. He could
better insure the health of the group if he would post some interesting
messages about recumbents instead of wasting his time, my time and everyone
else's time with his present nonsense.

I will do my part to keep the group healthy by bringing balance here to
anything reeking of politics and/or other absurdities. Perry could
contribute something too it seems to me instead of acting like a jealous
spoiled child.

Non-recumbent controversy killed this group!

Utter nonsense!

You don't understand what Usenet and ARBR stand for. This shows your
ignorance!



You were never interesting and you never will be.

At least I'm not a lonely, negative old man!

How many times do I have to tell you that I am not lonely before you are
going to believe me? I take pride in my negativism. It shows that I am a
thinker and do not follow the herd like a sheep. As for getting old, that is
a desired state for all of us unless you would rather die young.

If you want to
die, then go somewhere else and die by yourself.

I'll leave "die by yourself" to you, you lonely old man!

I love being alone, but I am never lonely. Try to figure that one out
with
your limited brain power if you can.

It's easy! No one wants to be with you! This is something people like
you never understand. It's called denial!

I got quite a laugh out of this bit of Perryism. I could easily have as many
friends as I want but I have never known what friends are for. They
invariably will turn out to be a pain in the you know what and I just don't
need them. But I suppose if you need friends, then you should acquire them.

If and when the thread multiplies, that is due to others starting
a
new
thread. I NEVER do that! Mr. Sherman will occasionally do that
because he
believes the subject has wandered. My policy is never to start a
new
thread.
I will stay on the same old thread until hell freezes over.

A few months ago you started a thread about me! So much for "I
NEVER
do that!" I guess this is another instance where you are a liar!

I once started one thread? So sue me!

You have started more than one thread. Do you understand what the word
"NEVER" means, especially when you write it in CAPS? Poor use of the
English language.

I probably started that thread in retaliation for one of your assininities.
In fact, now that I think about it, that is precisely how it happened. You
were calling me a liar in a new thread with that word associated with my
name in a subject heading and I got fed up with your ****. By and large, I
NEVER initiate threads.

But weren't you the jerk who looked me up on the web to see where I
was at
and then posted that information to the group. You are just too jerky
and
nerdy for words!

I didn't look you up on the Internet. You e-mailed me and told me you
were from Worthington. This is the second time you have brought this
up. Are you senile?

What gets said in an email is private and not for posting to a newsgroup.
That is why I call you a jerk and a nerd for not observing something so
elementary. If and when you want to post something to a newsgorup that was
said in an email, you should first ask permission.

ARBR is far better now that it ever was before.

This is a Usenet group about recumbents. I would estimate less
than 5%
of your responses are about recumbents. You are violating Usnet
policy! You don't understand what Usenet is about!

I understand it is not about being dull and boring - which is all you
are
ever good for. Why the hell don't you go to BROL and stay there if
you want
to be on topic all the time?

Why don't you go to a political discussion group? At least then you
would meet Usenet policy. This is a group for recumbents.

If and when I say something about recumbents it is of such import that the
group needs too know. But I am mostly here to make damn sure that liberals
don't take over this group like they had when I first came aboard about 2
years ago.

Those assholes who have left this group were all a bunch of dirty
rotten
liberals who were always posting their g.d. political nonsense here.

They left because of the lack of recumbent talk! Replace the word
"liberals" and you are talking about you!

Anyone who comes here can post all they want about recumbents. I will not
interfere with such posts. They left because I would not let their political
comments go unchallenged. That was my mission when I came here and it is
still my mission. If you do not want to tangle with me, then keep your
liberal politics to yourself. I am strictly a responder. I do not initiate
threads on politics (or any other subject either except rarely).

I do not post long messages.

Liar!

Asshole!

I do not post
single sentences as that is the hallmark of an idiot. Most who post
like
that are concise to the point of not making any sense at all.

Tom doesn't make any sense? Tom posts this way all the time.

Yes, and I have taken note of that too. Tom is not really up to my high
standards. He is an engineer and I am an artist. There is no virtue in
brevity just as there is no virtue in being longwinded. I strike the perfect
mean. Others would be well advised to follow my example if they wish to
enter the sacred halls of Valhalla, the domain of gods and intellectuals
like myself.

A man of few words is invariably a man of few thoughts.

You need to look up my posts when ARBR was about recumbents before
you
make these statements. This also shows your ignorance!

I think I have been here about 2 years now. What do you expect me to
do, go
back and look up **** here on this newsgroup? Perish the thought!

Then you shouldn't have made the statement. Didn't they teach you
anything in college? Don't you know how to research? Don't you know
how to write? Please at least base your statements on fact! Anyone
can write fiction. You've proved that!

I have known you via this newsgroup for approx. 2 years now. That is long
enough and I know everything about you that I will ever want to know. The
day I look up any post of yours is the day that hell will freeze over. Try
to get real, why don't you?

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota