Johan Museeuw

C'mon guys.
Lets leave Ken Caminiti where he belongs.
Now the guy I really thought was doping all along is busted, and
bigtime, and really hardly anything in the press or the threads.

Think about it, The Lion of Flanders.
Riding off the front in Paris Roubaix at age 34 whatever, dropping
Hincapie and Boonen, just riding them off his wheel, and going away
solo for 40 km on his own.

Give me a break.
Of course was was on the stuff. I'm just sorry they didnt get him at
the time.
George or Boonen would have won, wouldnt have been so bone-tired
trying to stay with someone jacked to the gills on HGH or whatever he
used.

Remember how UCI had to protest because there was NO post race urine
collected "by mistake" the last time he won Paris Roubaix. Whoops!

Talk about freezing the B sample. They didnt even get an A sample.
Complete cover up by the Belgians.
Wouldnt Museeuw have gone around and asked or demanded a sample be
taken so the result would stand, that is if he were clean

hombre_de_bicycle schreef:


Complete cover up by the Belgians.

what cover up by "Belgians" ?

"hombre_de_bicycle" wrote in message
om...
C'mon guys.
Lets leave Ken Caminiti where he belongs.
Now the guy I really thought was doping all along is busted, and
bigtime, and really hardly anything in the press or the threads.

Think about it, The Lion of Flanders.
Riding off the front in Paris Roubaix at age 34 whatever, dropping
Hincapie and Boonen, just riding them off his wheel, and going away
solo for 40 km on his own.

Give me a break.
Of course was was on the stuff. I'm just sorry they didnt get him at
the time.
George or Boonen would have won, wouldnt have been so bone-tired
trying to stay with someone jacked to the gills on HGH or whatever he
used.

What makes you think that Hincapie and Boonen were clean? I was up at 5am
this morning and couldn't get back to sleep so I put the 2002 P-R dvd into
the computer. Museeuw was flying and a delight to watch. If you assume
that they were all juiced, then you have to conclude that the best athlete
won. Unfortunately, most of the classics have become rather boring due,
IMO, to drugs leveling the playing field artificially.

"B. Lafferty" wrote in message

What makes you think that Hincapie and Boonen were clean? I was up at 5am
this morning and couldn't get back to sleep ... snip

Was it the Pot Belge?

"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message
...

"B. Lafferty" wrote in message

What makes you think that Hincapie and Boonen were clean? I was up at
5am
this morning and couldn't get back to sleep ... snip

Was it the Pot Belge?

Nothing so exotic. Two dogs and four cats who can't understand that it's a
holiday.

Van Hoorebeeck Bart wrote in message ...
hombre_de_bicycle schreef:


Complete cover up by the Belgians.

what cover up by "Belgians" ?

Well as I recall, if I'm wrong I take it back and apologize, that
Belgian officals were responsible for collecting the post race urines
and didnt. UCI was furious but nothing was done. Am I remembering
correctly or was it Flanders instead of Paris Roubaix?

hombre_de_bicycle wrote:

Van Hoorebeeck Bart wrote in message ...
hombre_de_bicycle schreef:


Complete cover up by the Belgians.

what cover up by "Belgians" ?

Well as I recall, if I'm wrong I take it back and apologize, that
Belgian officals were responsible for collecting the post race urines
and didnt. UCI was furious but nothing was done. Am I remembering
correctly or was it Flanders instead of Paris Roubaix?

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/?id=...pr02/apr16news
Paris-Roubaix missing controls "an administrative error"

The French Ministry of Youth and Sports (MJS) has admitted that the
absence of doping controls at Sunday's100th edition of the Paris-Roubaix
was an 'administrative error'.

The Lille regional director of the MJS was informed of the race by the
organisers, ASO (the company that also
runs the Tour de France) but confused the Classic with the mountain bike
race that took place in the same area on the same weekend.
----------------

if the french ****ed up, is it still a conspiracy?
heather

On 11 Oct 2004 12:43:44 -0700,
(hombre_de_bicycle) wrote:

Van Hoorebeeck Bart wrote in message ...
hombre_de_bicycle schreef:


Complete cover up by the Belgians.

what cover up by "Belgians" ?

Well as I recall, if I'm wrong I take it back and apologize, that
Belgian officals were responsible for collecting the post race urines
and didnt. UCI was furious but nothing was done. Am I remembering
correctly or was it Flanders instead of Paris Roubaix?

Think about it. Why would Belgian officials be doing something at
Paris to Roubaix?

JT


****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:57:52 -0400, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote:

Think about it. Why would Belgian officials be doing something at
Paris to Roubaix?

All of the French officials were picked up for associating with known
dopers? I thought we already covered this a couple of weeks ago.
If not, I want credit for starting the rumor first.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

"B. Lafferty" wrote in message nk.net...
"hombre_de_bicycle" wrote in message
om...
C'mon guys.
Lets leave Ken Caminiti where he belongs.
Now the guy I really thought was doping all along is busted, and
bigtime, and really hardly anything in the press or the threads.

Think about it, The Lion of Flanders.
Riding off the front in Paris Roubaix at age 34 whatever, dropping
Hincapie and Boonen, just riding them off his wheel, and going away
solo for 40 km on his own.

Give me a break.
Of course was was on the stuff. I'm just sorry they didnt get him at
the time.
George or Boonen would have won, wouldnt have been so bone-tired
trying to stay with someone jacked to the gills on HGH or whatever he
used.

What makes you think that Hincapie and Boonen were clean? I was up at 5am
this morning and couldn't get back to sleep so I put the 2002 P-R dvd into
the computer. Museeuw was flying and a delight to watch. If you assume
that they were all juiced, then you have to conclude that the best athlete
won. Unfortunately, most of the classics have become rather boring due,
IMO, to drugs leveling the playing field artificially.

Wasn't Giorgio Furlan's Milan-Sanremo victory not impressive? Or
Berzin in LBL? Or Pantani's Giro until Madonna di Campliglio? Or
Museeuw's Ronde '98 where he finished with foam on his lips? Or Riis'
Tour. Or Dario Frigo's Paris Nice?? And what about VDB's year 1999?
what drugs definitely don't do is leveling the playing field.

Some people say that the increasing testing and the developing of new
test methods has resulted in an decreasing doping use over the last
few years. Maybe the many bunch sprints in the classics or the fact
that the final of a classic is starting later and later, are a sign of
that.

Kenny