#1
|
|||
|
|||
PowerCranks Study
This from Frank Day's recent Newsletter...
[The first criticisms I heard about the PC's came from those who said "well, if they are so good, why aren't the top cyclists using them?" Well, that argument became easy to rebut in the last year or so. But, the other criticism has been that "there has been no study proving the worth of the cranks and substantiating the claims." Well, I am glad to report that drought is about to end. I have been informed (and have seen the galleys) that the first study of training effectiveness in trained cyclists is to be published in November. I must say, based upon the study design, I would not have predicted the magnitude of the benefits they found. But, I shouldn't say more until it is published. I will, of course, put a link to the study once it is available.] I'll look forward to reading the publishing and debating this a little more. Phil Holman |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
PowerCranks Study
It will be most interesting to see if it is a within groups or between
groups design. Christopher Moyer On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Phil Holman wrote: This from Frank Day's recent Newsletter... [The first criticisms I heard about the PC's came from those who said "well, if they are so good, why aren't the top cyclists using them?" Well, that argument became easy to rebut in the last year or so. But, the other criticism has been that "there has been no study proving the worth of the cranks and substantiating the claims." Well, I am glad to report that drought is about to end. I have been informed (and have seen the galleys) that the first study of training effectiveness in trained cyclists is to be published in November. I must say, based upon the study design, I would not have predicted the magnitude of the benefits they found. But, I shouldn't say more until it is published. I will, of course, put a link to the study once it is available.] I'll look forward to reading the publishing and debating this a little more. Phil Holman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
PowerCranks Study
Phil Holman wrote:
This from Frank Day's recent Newsletter... I have been informed (and have seen the galleys) that the first study of training effectiveness in trained cyclists is to be published in November. I'll look forward to reading the publishing and debating this a little more. What did you think of the study on untrained cyclists that was published last year (MSSE 34(11): 1854-1858)? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
PowerCranks Study
Robert Chung wrote:
Phil Holman wrote: This from Frank Day's recent Newsletter... I have been informed (and have seen the galleys) that the first study of training effectiveness in trained cyclists is to be published in November. I'll look forward to reading the publishing and debating this a little more. What did you think of the study on untrained cyclists that was published last year (MSSE 34(11): 1854-1858)? Ooops. Sorry. Ignore that. That was the study of Rotor Cranks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | July 16th 04 04:28 AM |
Typical Mountain Biker Demonstrates Their Inability to Learn | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | March 3rd 04 03:40 PM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |