Moment motorist driving a convertible is caught on camera confronting a cyclist and repeatedly calling him a ‘f***** idiot’

The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

On 31/08/2016 16:59, Aubrey Straw wrote:
Bod wrote:

The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

Here's the whole video from YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRcrVm6FGyE

I don't think either cyclist or driver come out of the incident too well.

I reckon the driver was at fault to start with, then the cyclist aggravated
the situation by not slowing down and making a meal of the situation. That
caused the driver to really lose it and he drove quite recklessly to
remonstrate with the cyclist who chose to use his D-lock to ward off the
driver.

Overall, I think the driver's was initially at fault and had no cause to
drive as recklessly as he did after that even allowing for any provocation
he might have felt from the cyclist's less than perfect behaviour.

Indeed.

On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 17:20:52 UTC+1, Bod wrote:


Overall, I think the driver's was initially at fault and had no cause to
drive as recklessly as he did after that even allowing for any provocation
he might have felt from the cyclist's less than perfect behaviour.

Indeed.

‘Our weather is being engineered. Seek the truth’- obvious fruitloop.

On 31/08/2016 17:26, Alycidon wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 17:20:52 UTC+1, Bod wrote:


Overall, I think the driver's was initially at fault and had no cause to
drive as recklessly as he did after that even allowing for any provocation
he might have felt from the cyclist's less than perfect behaviour.

Indeed.

‘Our weather is being engineered. Seek the truth’- obvious fruitloop.

Yes I saw that and thought the same.

Bod wrote:
The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous
driving and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

"The video shows Mr Williams cycling along a road in Kingston, south west
London, when the Peugeot pulls out in front of him from a parking space,
narrowly missing him".

No it does not.
Some ****** on a bicycle taps my car - he is left in the gutter where he
belongs.

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:16:38 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Bod wrote:
The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous
driving and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

"The video shows Mr Williams cycling along a road in Kingston, south west
London, when the Peugeot pulls out in front of him from a parking space,
narrowly missing him".

No it does not.
Some ****** on a bicycle taps my car - he is left in the gutter where he
belongs.


Feel the rage in this one.

--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug

On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:19:18 UTC+1, Bod wrote:
The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

If I can touch your car you are to close, doesn't seem to matter when they are weaving in and out of traffic or pedestrians.

On 31/08/2016 20:55, doug wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:19:18 UTC+1, Bod wrote:
The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

If I can touch your car you are to close, doesn't seem to matter when they are weaving in and out of traffic or pedestrians.

It certainly looks like the cyclist got too close to the car, not the
other way round. Just an everyday juggle for road space, not a
threatening moment.

But just another example of two idiots in a hurry managing to find time
to argue.

On 31/08/2016 16:19, Bod wrote:

The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

What - in your opinion and in your own words - does "...questioned
for..." mean (assuming it mans anything at all, of course)?

Does it mean:

(a) accused of
(b) charged with, or
(d) neither of the above?

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:14:05 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 31/08/2016 20:55, doug wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:19:18 UTC+1, Bod wrote:
The driver who was originally questioned by police for dangerous driving
and antisocial behaviour was let off with a caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-f-idiot.html

If I can touch your car you are to close, doesn't seem to matter when they are weaving in and out of traffic or pedestrians.

It certainly looks like the cyclist got too close to the car, not the
other way round. Just an everyday juggle for road space, not a
threatening moment.

But just another example of two idiots in a hurry managing to find time
to argue.

Where did you see it? I watched the video and the driver was already out of the car. The part we need to see is missing.

--
There was an old man from Limerick,
Who was completely unaware of the short often humorous poems that shared the same name as his hometown.