|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:15:37 GMT, Gawnsoft
wrote: True, but then again people die putting on their socks [snip] Quite. However, at this point all I'm looking for is data regarding the relative levels of protection offered by bicycle helmets. 'Consumer Reports' has been suggested; and it seems that Specialized is preferred by the gentleman who conducts testing in the UK. If anyone knows of any other sources of information I'd be most grateful (as, I am sure, would others). |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:56:17 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote: One of the few places I've found comparative results from objective tests has been Consumer Reports magazine here in the US. They don't report numerical answers, but with little color-coded bubbles indicating things like "Excellent", "Good", "Fair" etc. Based on their ratings, the definite trend is that less expensive helmets have heavier weight, less ventilation, perhaps klutzier straps, and more protection. For more expensive helmets, the opposite is true. Just paid the subscription for Consumer Reports and read the July 2004 test of helmets. Interesting stuff, especially as the helmet the LBS sold me was on the 'not recommended' list! *sigh* Thank you very much, Frank. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Glm wrote:
Just paid the subscription for Consumer Reports and read the July 2004 test of helmets. Interesting stuff, especially as the helmet the LBS sold me was on the 'not recommended' list! *sigh* Thank you very much, Frank. As I recall (sorry, I'm too tired to double check) the "not recommended" was because a buckle broke in a weight-drop test. I'd say don't worry. One of the dozens of papers I have on file reported on the forces on helmet straps in simulated collisions. The conclusion was that in a typical collision, the forces are very small, on the order of ten pounds. And in any case, you're almost certainly going to go through your entire cycling career without needing the helmet anyway. That's assuming you're not into macho mountain biking, track racing or criterium racing. -- --------------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com, replace with cc.ysu dot edu] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Glm wrote:
I certainly don't want to rub salt into the wounds of the ongoing helmet debate, but I was wondering whether anyone knew where I could find statistics from safety tests (or other objective assessments) conducted on current bike helmets. http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/nytimes.html will get you started. I asked too and Peter Keller sent me this link. -paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:20:41 -0600, Paul Cassel wrote:
Glm wrote: I certainly don't want to rub salt into the wounds of the ongoing helmet debate, but I was wondering whether anyone knew where I could find statistics from safety tests (or other objective assessments) conducted on current bike helmets. http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/nytimes.html will get you started. I asked too and Peter Keller sent me this link. -paul Interesting; thank you. Andrew Lang, 19th-century Scottish poet, was right, of course - "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp posts - for support rather than for illumination." - and the thorny subject of the correlation between bicycle safety and helmet wearing seems to be a quintessential example of this. Pundits of either camp can draw upon many and varied sources of (often weakly interrelated) data in support of their claims. The point about moral hazard is well taken. It's interesting to see the relationship between, for example, HIV statistics and common wisdom regarding what is 'safe' that has preceded trends in people's behaviour. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Test riding...the best way? | Nathan Hunt | Mountain Biking | 28 | October 23rd 04 09:35 PM |
Former RBR poster tests positive | Ken Lehner | Racing | 77 | January 10th 04 02:07 PM |
Bacchetta Giro Test Ride Report, Mini Review | Rocketman | Recumbent Biking | 10 | January 1st 04 12:43 AM |