#21
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 7:01:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/tube...our-de-france/ -- Jay Beattie Tubeless are great on my MTB, where lower pressure for better traction, and the lack of an inner tube to avoid getting pinch flats, are an unarguable advantage. But on the road? Watching others suffer through flats and mounting convinced me its not worth it. Tubular on the road? Loved them for feel and cornering. Did my own mounting. Lighter wheels and safer stronger tires. Kept them for race and hard workouts only, and used carbon clinchers with lightweight tires for street and training. Then with a Veloflex clincher, crashed when the sidewall blew out and came off the bead, leaving rim skating on asphalt til the wheel grabbed and slapped me down on the road like a crackback football block, then slid an unknown distance grinding up my shoes and body. Broke left femur, torn left rotator cuff, head injury, torn left meniscus, slipped disc between L3 and L4. Put a wrinkle in my life for a long time. Since then, clinchers on alloy wheels only for local commuting. All training and recreational rides on the road are on tubular now. A well glued tubular will stay on the rim even if fully deflated. I'll have rubber, not slippery metal or plastic, between me and the asphalt if I get a flat. Ride what you want, but a well glued tubular gives you a safety advantage no other bike tires style does. (unless some wise-arse wants to say, what about a solid pneumatic tire?) |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:46:33 PM UTC-5, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 8:40:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. He's worth over ONE MILLION dollars and he's complaining about $50.00 worth of groceries? INCONCEIVABLE! Not sure what century you are living in. But today ONE MILLION dollars is not really a lot of money. It is very easy to go through that amount of money. When I spend hundreds of dollars on medical care or prescriptions, I notice. I also notice when I spend $50 at the grocery store. And of course in the USA, $1 million would only be a down payment on a shack house. And in other parts you would have a mansion. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 01:01:39 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:46:33 PM UTC-5, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 8:40:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. He's worth over ONE MILLION dollars and he's complaining about $50.00 worth of groceries? INCONCEIVABLE! Not sure what century you are living in. But today ONE MILLION dollars is not really a lot of money.It is very easy to go through that amount of money. When I spend hundreds of dollars on medical care or prescriptions, I notice. I also notice when I spend $50 at the grocery store. And of course in the USA, $1 million would only be a down payment on a shack house. And in other parts you would have a mansion. I live in Thailand and have for the past 47 years although I worked in Indonesia for about 20 of those years. And while 1,000,000 US$, about Thai Baht 30,000,000, it is not a fortune compared to what "The Rich" would call a "fortune" but it is a large sum of money relative to what "Joe Average" makes in salary. US$ 50 would be about TB 1,500 which isn't an outrageous number. I really have no idea what my wife spends weekly or monthly on food and household supplies, as she has her own household allowance, but the last time we went shopping I paid and the bill was in the TB 1,500 range. For, probably a week's supply of most food. I would comment that we eat considerably better than the average working man so what we pay is not indicative what the average Thai working man would pay. As for medical care if one picks and chooses their hospital or clinic costs are very low compared to U.S. costs - I once read that a USian can fly to Thailand, stay in a luxury hotel and have a surgical procedure done, and fly back to the U.S. cheaper than the cost of the same procedure in the U.S. - and Thai nationals of course have the "30 Baht medical plan" where they pay 30 Baht for a visit to a clinic or hospital and ALL medical care proscribed by the doctor is covered by that fee. -- Cheers, John B. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On 7/8/2019 9:43 PM, Oculus Lights wrote:
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 7:01:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/tube...our-de-france/ -- Jay Beattie Tubeless are great on my MTB, where lower pressure for better traction, and the lack of an inner tube to avoid getting pinch flats, are an unarguable advantage. But on the road? Watching others suffer through flats and mounting convinced me its not worth it. Tubular on the road? Loved them for feel and cornering. Did my own mounting. Lighter wheels and safer stronger tires. Kept them for race and hard workouts only, and used carbon clinchers with lightweight tires for street and training. Then with a Veloflex clincher, crashed when the sidewall blew out and came off the bead, leaving rim skating on asphalt til the wheel grabbed and slapped me down on the road like a crackback football block, then slid an unknown distance grinding up my shoes and body. Broke left femur, torn left rotator cuff, head injury, torn left meniscus, slipped disc between L3 and L4. Put a wrinkle in my life for a long time. Since then, clinchers on alloy wheels only for local commuting. All training and recreational rides on the road are on tubular now. A well glued tubular will stay on the rim even if fully deflated. I'll have rubber, not slippery metal or plastic, between me and the asphalt if I get a flat. Ride what you want, but a well glued tubular gives you a safety advantage no other bike tires style does. (unless some wise-arse wants to say, what about a solid pneumatic tire?) +1 on both tubeless and tubulars. Besides which tubs are much less expensive than premium clinchers for roughly the same weight and feel. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 5:40:19 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. Unlike some useless POS, I am concerned about the cost of living effects ESPWCIALLY on the less wealthy people. Living in Thailand shows that you don't give one damn about the lower classes. So kiss off with your false memories. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 5:41:44 PM UTC-7, Radey Shouman wrote:
Tom Kunich writes: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:39:44 AM UTC-7, Radey Shouman wrote: Tom Kunich writes: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? He's got a computer and at least one opinion. What more does one need? Radey - if you have an opinion and nothing more there is the .soc group. Here you are expected to actually have some technical knowledge. The major problem with the Internet these days is that people mistake opinions for knowledge. Even the media now has eschewed knowledge for opinion. It's Usenet -- no one vets your palmares, no one vouches for your bona fides. But every reader can decide for him- or herself whether a post is sufficiently useful/interesting/entertaining to read. Hostility can be both unrelenting *and* entertaining, but it's tough to keep that up for 20 or 30 posts a day. Look at Andre, a man hardened by years of payment by the word, see how he paces himself. I'm not all sure that years of reading Usenet have been time well spent, but I have learned a thing or two. One is that, although I devoutly hope one day to retire while still able to ride a bike, a person *can* have too much free time. The other is that if doing or reading something makes me crazy, it's better to give it a rest. -- I don't follow you. What does "palmares" have to do with anything? tech is not who you rode with, what you rode and why you rode it. If you cannot see what works and what doesn't than why in hell would you be on .tech to begin with? Surely you might not understand a point or a necessary repair, but if it is explained to you and you cannot verify that it is correct simply by trying it, then again you haven't any place on .tech. I have never seen any addition to the group from John or Frank and Ridesalot. To them this is nothing more than a social group. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 1:01:41 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:46:33 PM UTC-5, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 8:40:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement.. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. He's worth over ONE MILLION dollars and he's complaining about $50.00 worth of groceries? INCONCEIVABLE! Not sure what century you are living in. But today ONE MILLION dollars is not really a lot of money. It is very easy to go through that amount of money. When I spend hundreds of dollars on medical care or prescriptions, I notice. I also notice when I spend $50 at the grocery store. And of course in the USA, $1 million would only be a down payment on a shack house. And in other parts you would have a mansion. There are people that know how to handle money and people who do not. Apparently there are a very large number of the later on this group. Reminds me of my brother who just retired and he had an entire year of back paid-time-off saved up. He took that ENTIRE bundle and bought a Lexus top end. Now the insurance payments are so high that he has to watch the wine he drinks. He use to be an aficionado. Now he is a Trader Joes. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 2:06:57 AM UTC-7, John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 01:01:39 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:46:33 PM UTC-5, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 8:40:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. He's worth over ONE MILLION dollars and he's complaining about $50.00 worth of groceries? INCONCEIVABLE! Not sure what century you are living in. But today ONE MILLION dollars is not really a lot of money.It is very easy to go through that amount of money. When I spend hundreds of dollars on medical care or prescriptions, I notice. I also notice when I spend $50 at the grocery store. And of course in the USA, $1 million would only be a down payment on a shack house. And in other parts you would have a mansion. I live in Thailand and have for the past 47 years although I worked in Indonesia for about 20 of those years. And while 1,000,000 US$, about Thai Baht 30,000,000, it is not a fortune compared to what "The Rich" would call a "fortune" but it is a large sum of money relative to what "Joe Average" makes in salary. US$ 50 would be about TB 1,500 which isn't an outrageous number. I really have no idea what my wife spends weekly or monthly on food and household supplies, as she has her own household allowance, but the last time we went shopping I paid and the bill was in the TB 1,500 range. For, probably a week's supply of most food. I would comment that we eat considerably better than the average working man so what we pay is not indicative what the average Thai working man would pay. As for medical care if one picks and chooses their hospital or clinic costs are very low compared to U.S. costs - I once read that a USian can fly to Thailand, stay in a luxury hotel and have a surgical procedure done, and fly back to the U.S. cheaper than the cost of the same procedure in the U.S. - and Thai nationals of course have the "30 Baht medical plan" where they pay 30 Baht for a visit to a clinic or hospital and ALL medical care proscribed by the doctor is covered by that fee. -- Cheers, John B. Your entire message was summed up with " I really have no idea what my wife spends weekly or monthly on food". |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
Tom Kunich writes:
On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 5:41:44 PM UTC-7, Radey Shouman wrote: Tom Kunich writes: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 7:39:44 AM UTC-7, Radey Shouman wrote: Tom Kunich writes: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? He's got a computer and at least one opinion. What more does one need? Radey - if you have an opinion and nothing more there is the .soc group. Here you are expected to actually have some technical knowledge. The major problem with the Internet these days is that people mistake opinions for knowledge. Even the media now has eschewed knowledge for opinion. It's Usenet -- no one vets your palmares, no one vouches for your bona fides. But every reader can decide for him- or herself whether a post is sufficiently useful/interesting/entertaining to read. Hostility can be both unrelenting *and* entertaining, but it's tough to keep that up for 20 or 30 posts a day. Look at Andre, a man hardened by years of payment by the word, see how he paces himself. I'm not all sure that years of reading Usenet have been time well spent, but I have learned a thing or two. One is that, although I devoutly hope one day to retire while still able to ride a bike, a person *can* have too much free time. The other is that if doing or reading something makes me crazy, it's better to give it a rest. -- I don't follow you. What does "palmares" have to do with anything? tech is not who you rode with, what you rode and why you rode it. If you cannot see what works and what doesn't than why in hell would you be on .tech to begin with? Surely you might not understand a point or a necessary repair, but if it is explained to you and you cannot verify that it is correct simply by trying it, then again you haven't any place on .tech. I have never seen any addition to the group from John or Frank and Ridesalot. To them this is nothing more than a social group. My point is that you saying that changes no one's opinion -- anyone reading makes up his own mind. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
So Long Tubulars?
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:52:00 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 5:40:19 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:31:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote: On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski wrote: On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 3:42:06 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote: Chalo wrote: What good is riding the tire without getting flats, if you have to spend more time fooling around with it than if you were getting lots of flats in a conventional system? You're trading the chance of a small inconvenience for the certainty of a larger one. If your riding time is scarce and precious, but basement lurking time is plentiful, I guess I can see the appeal. You probably won't have to mess with it while you're on the trail. But you will have to mess with it, both when installing the stuff and again every so often when you take out the curds and whey-- and that's true even if you didn't get any punctures at all. Some people like to fiddle with the hardware, and some like to just use it and not think about it. With guitars, I’m a hardware fiddler, so I ditched music and went into engineering. A friend of mine posted a picture of himself adjusting the valve lash on his BMW motorcycle and I had to think back to the last time I ever had to do that (1988?). I also think we all have different levels of how much we are willing to pay for an incremental performance improvement. ... Or for an irrelevant or negligible performance improvement. And we definitely have different judgments on the benefits vs. detriments of performance improvements. Why would I go to tubeless tires? I'd have to invest a bundle and learn a new maintenance drill, but for what? To reduce my few flats per year to "few minus one"? To reduce my rolling resistance, when I'm usually the first or second rider to finish a ride? (Tip: Ride with old folks! It's easier!) Why would I switch to a much lighter bike? I'm usually first or second to the top of a hill, even on the tandem. (See the tip above.) Why would I switch to disc brakes? I don't do that much riding in the rain, and anyway I've never once gotten in trouble by my rim brakes being inadequate. I understand that there are people who want whatever the advertisers are promoting most this year. Some do it because of the "art" value of the (supposedly) top technology. ("I've got the finest bike!!!"). Some may do it to beat their buddies to the next telephone pole. Have at it, if you like. But that's not what most of my riding is about. What I don't understand is people who don't understand that some of us don't give a damn about three fewer pounds, or one thousandth less rolling resistance, or magical handling that only cognoscenti can detect. Why not just ride the bike? - Frank Krygowski But what do you know? After all you don't have a $4,000 bike like The Expert does so obviously you don't know nothing :-( -- cheers, John B. And you don't have anything so why are you on this group? Well, of course I was talking to Frank so you might be said to be lurking on corners and eavesdropping on others, but you might say that I'm here to expose those who tell lies and attempt to inflate their own ego by bragging abut their great wealth, and who, at the same time, weep and cry about how they don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. -- cheers, John B. Or we can look at you living in a foreign country unable to ever move back to the USA and making up reality as you go along. Where did I ever say I don't have sufficient funds to buy groceries. To you telling the truth is something you cannot stand and you find a psychological need to blow it out of proportion. What, "unable to move back"? And as for living in a foreign country, given your last name your ancestors elected to "live in a foreign country" so your argument appears to be "the pot calling he kettle black". And no, you didn't say, specifically, that you couldn't afford groceries but you certainly appeared to be very concerned about the 50 odd dollars you spent and I guess that I assumed that anyone who was so concerned about spending that vast sum of money must be a bit worried about their budget. Else why would you have mentioned it? I am worth over a million dollars. That used to be a lot of money but no longer is. Being someone as stupid as you or Frank and unable to realize that the future is not predictable and inflation could diminish your living standard is what marks the difference between a careful man and those who are not. You might try to remember that since Thailand is set for a large advance in living standards and commensurate inflation. No I, certainly, and from his posts I assume Frank, are probably as knowledgeable as you about the economy, if not more knowledgeable, and yes inflation will decrease the value of your savings but if you have invested in physical assets such as real estate than the value of your "estate" tends to be inflated in price to (roughly) equate to the inflation. And stock in such investments as gas and oil companies, rubber growers, etc., generally grow in cash terms, again roughly, in accordance with inflation. -- cheers, John B. Unlike some useless POS, I am concerned about the cost of living effects ESPWCIALLY on the less wealthy people. Living in Thailand shows that you don't give one damn about the lower classes. So kiss off with your false memories. Well, in sense, I don't concern myself with "poor folks" primarily because two of my wife's younger brothers were common laborers when my wife and I were first married, about 50 years ago, and are now both millionaires several times over. Solely due to their own efforts. If two poorly educated kids from a tiny farming town in N.E. Thailand can become millionaires by the time they are 60 years old it makes me believe that being poor is largely a matter of an individual not willing to work for it. -- Cheers, John B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Storing Tubulars long term | IMKen | Techniques | 0 | August 31st 05 06:53 PM |
Storing Tubulars long term | [email protected] | Techniques | 0 | August 31st 05 04:38 PM |
2005 STP Trip Report (long, long, long) | Claire Petersky | General | 13 | July 15th 05 08:55 AM |
2005 STP Trip Report (long, long, long) | Claire Petersky | Rides | 13 | July 15th 05 08:55 AM |
RSVP 2004 Trip Report (long, long, long) | Claire Petersky | Rides | 2 | August 12th 04 04:34 AM |