A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Justice at last



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 20th 10, 04:53 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
JMS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,929
Default Justice at last

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:52:23 +0100, Tom Crispin
wrote:

snip



Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration numbers as
they are so difficult to trace?


A pedestrian is unlikely to cause an accident against another
pedestrian - and is unlikely to run off in such circumstances.

Unlike a cyclist:

run in to a car and damage it - and ride off from the scene.
run a red light and cause an accident : ride off from the scene.
knock someone down on a pedestrian crossing : ride off from the scene.
hit a pedestrian whilst riding on the footpath : ride off from the
scene.

the list is endless.
--
Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws.

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.
(With thanks to KeithT for the idea)

Ads
  #2  
Old April 21st 10, 07:16 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
webreader
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 449
Default Justice at last

On Apr 20, 4:53*pm, JMS wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:52:23 +0100, Tom Crispin

wrote:

snip

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration numbers as
they are so difficult to trace?


A pedestrian is unlikely to cause an accident against another
pedestrian - and is unlikely to run off in such circumstances.

Unlike a cyclist:

run in to a car and damage it - and ride off from the scene.
run a red light and cause an accident : ride off from the scene.
knock someone down on a pedestrian crossing : ride off from the scene.
hit a pedestrian whilst riding on the footpath : ride off from the
scene.

the list is endless.
--
Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws.

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.
(With thanks to KeithT for the idea)


You just don't get it do you.
Cycle registration will not work because in a small percentage of
cases it does not work on cars.
Cyclists allready have insurance because they are either a member of
CTC or they have household insurance that covers them.
Cyclists do not need regulation because they dont damage people/
property.
Cyclists do not need tutution as they never make mistakes.
Cyclists do not need to stop at red lights because they know how to
cross a red light safely.
Cyclist only cycle on the pavement because they are forced to.

Does this help you?

WSR
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Justice? iarocu UK 1 November 17th 07 10:55 AM
Mob Justice PiledHigher Australia 0 April 27th 07 12:12 AM
Is this justice? MWP Australia 2 October 6th 06 07:24 AM
Justice? Helen Deborah Vecht UK 3 November 12th 05 04:35 PM
hit and run justice MontanaGuy Social Issues 1 August 28th 05 10:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.