|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Zipp 340 vs. Zipp 303
I've been offered a set of NOS zipp 340s (ok, a few miles on them).
The 303 is allegedly the next generation of the 340? I've been told the rims are the same. Is there a real difference here? Being the skeptical curmudgeon I am, I can't see Zipp changing the model number because some one at corporate was bored. What _did_ change? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Zipp 340 vs. Zipp 303
Zipp changes the layup of their rims all the time even if there
*isn't* a change in the outer shape and/or model #. The current 303 rims are 44mm deep, and are heavier and stronger than the previous 38mm 303s. The 340s are quite old and I'm sure they have little in common with the new 303 rims. For one thing, the tension limit was 80kg on older Zipp rims (now 100kg), so that should give you some idea of their strength. The new shapes are also more aerodynamic. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Zipp 340 vs. Zipp 303
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:40:28 -0700, Ron Ruff
wrote: Zipp changes the layup of their rims all the time even if there *isn't* a change in the outer shape and/or model #. The current 303 rims are 44mm deep, and are heavier and stronger than the previous 38mm 303s. The 340s are quite old and I'm sure they have little in common with the new 303 rims. For one thing, the tension limit was 80kg on older Zipp rims (now 100kg), so that should give you some idea of their strength. The new shapes are also more aerodynamic. Some older Zipp rims had the spoke holes drilled straight out, not offset, which puts a bad bend in the spokes. I had a rear wheel that was often breaking spokes and think that was the cause. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Zipp 340 vs. Zipp 303
On Jul 28, 12:28 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote: Some older Zipp rims had the spoke holes drilled straight out, not offset, which puts a bad bend in the spokes. I had a rear wheel that was often breaking spokes and think that was the cause. I've heard that is true also, but there are other rims on the market today that are center-drilled. Bending the spoke near the nipple so that the nipple is better aligned with the hole solves this problem. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Zipp 340 vs. Zipp 303
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:23:40 -0700, Ron Ruff
wrote: On Jul 28, 12:28 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: Some older Zipp rims had the spoke holes drilled straight out, not offset, which puts a bad bend in the spokes. I had a rear wheel that was often breaking spokes and think that was the cause. I've heard that is true also, but there are other rims on the market today that are center-drilled. Bending the spoke near the nipple so that the nipple is better aligned with the hole solves this problem. It mitigates the problem. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Track Frameset, Zipp 950, Zipp 440 | Scott | Marketplace | 2 | August 17th 06 07:32 PM |
FS: Zipp 303, 404, 606 | www w3parts com | Marketplace | 0 | March 1st 06 02:57 PM |
FA: Zipp 440 Front Wheel 700cc Tubular w/ Zipp Balistic hub | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | December 8th 05 02:47 PM |
Zipp 202 wheelset FS | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 04 12:28 AM |
WTB: ZIPP 202 or 303 Wheelset | Roger Moore | Marketplace | 1 | December 29th 04 12:13 AM |