|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trek Madone 5.9 or 5.9 SL
Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or
strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Its all marketing. All Trek bikes ride the same -- ****ty.
They can't even get compact geometry right. "Graham" wrote in message ... "Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Its all marketing. All Trek bikes ride the same -- ****ty.
They can't even get compact geometry right. "Graham" wrote in message ... "Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
and what does Jay ride?
JayofMontreal wrote: Its all marketing. All Trek bikes ride the same -- ****ty. They can't even get compact geometry right. "Graham" wrote in message ... "Andrew Martin" wrote in message .com... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
and what does Jay ride?
JayofMontreal wrote: Its all marketing. All Trek bikes ride the same -- ****ty. They can't even get compact geometry right. "Graham" wrote in message ... "Andrew Martin" wrote in message .com... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bigger difference are the wheels.
"Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bigger difference are the wheels.
"Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Graham" wrote in message ...
"Andrew Martin" wrote in message om... Apart from the strangly shaped tubes, are there any structural or strength differences between these bikes? I'm 178 and have ridden either a 5500 or 5900 for the past couple years. Do I have anything to worry about with the 5.9 SL? I know it's trite, but I just prefer the cleaner look of the SL, but I want a solid ride first and foremost. Thanks, -a What 178 years old ! Graham 6'3" 178lbs 28yo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Trek Madone complete bike 56cm | Robbie Brown | Marketplace | 2 | October 16th 04 08:18 AM |
Trek Madone 5.9 for £1300ukp check this out?? | Sean Grosvenor | Racing | 3 | February 7th 04 07:33 AM |
TREK MADONE - Ebay Very Interesting! | Dave Mayer | Marketplace | 6 | January 5th 04 08:00 PM |