|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
hello. i havent replied yet in this thread, but i feel like i should just because im a street rider. im extremely impressed that this type of competition is seriously being considered. i think its important to have a reason for street riders to get together with everyone else seeing as some of us (including me) suck at trials and freestyle and muni haha. but yeah, as for a name for it, i dont think that street freestyle is a good name for it only because of the word "freestyle" in there. street is its own style, it shouldnt be falsly associated with freestyle i dont think. i mean freestyle is strictly a flat ground thing. street isnt. i mean sure theres a lot of moves you could do flat ground and call it street, but not everything. like hopping on the top of the tire i dont consider street. so yeah, not street freestyle, but i think street is what it should be call. thats what its called in every other sport pretty much, so why not in unicycling as well? i know street unicycling gets a lot of insporation from skateboarding, bmxing and inline skating, so why not continue with the name of this type of competition. as for the setup, thats tough. the problem is that the transitions at most skateparks are too steep for unicycles, and the flat parts arent long enough to get at least 2 rotations in (for example on the top of a box that has a ramp going up to it on either side, the flat surface at the top might be 1 and a half rotations which isnt always enough). that isnt to say you can use a skatepark. its saying that you will have to carefully look around to find a skate park that is ideal for unicycling. you will alos have to bring in picnic tables and rails and everything like that. and im sure it wouldnt be tough to make a pretty high and long box and have a set of 7 or 8 stairs going down at the end with a handrail on both sides. you will also have to have an infinite supply of wax. because it will be needed. oh, and i just came up with something. if you want it to be flowy, its tough. mostly because its hard to do tricks without lining them up first. so i think that for any obstacles (mostly stairs or downsloped ledges and rails) that will be used a lot and you need a perfect lineup, there should be markings on the ground as you ride up to them. these will tell you how many revolutions away you are form the obstacle (assuming you are on a 20 inch trials), and it allows you to try to line up a pedal however you wish before you reach the obstacle. and perhaps have different colours for each marking (example: green for 1 rev away, yellow for 2, red for 3) or something like that. anyways, thats just a thought and i think it would work. as for judging or figuring out who wins, same as a skate comp. have like 5 or 6 judges, and kick out the highest and lowest scores and average the others. and the time of each run should be probably 2 minutes. but experiment with that somehow. factors taken into consideration should be consistency, style, technical difficulty, and like how big you go... odnt know how to put that. for safety equipment, i think helmets should be manditory. no helmet, no riding. i know it might seem contradictory for me to say that seeing as i dont always wear mine, but i have begun to a lot more. my whole part in spaced out will not have a helmet, but any other videos that ive filmed for, my helmet has been on 95% of the time. i agree that we should send a sensible message. as for anything else, i agree with "hecklar". it should be the riders choice. i know for myself, i dont wear anything besides a helmet. not because i feel that im safe, but because i feel that they do restrict some movement that you need for flopping aorund more than in trials. the only other people who flop around like street riders are freestyle riders, and they certainly arent wearing any. i bet they couldnt do some of the same stuff with leg armour on, but im sure theyre allowed to (dont know the rules). as well, i bet a lot of people will be using plastic pedals for grinding, and they are a lot more shin friendly than metal ones. another issue, i dont thikn there should be a restriction on the unicycle being used. if they want to ride a 16", let them. if they want to ride a coker with that crazy shifting hub, let them. i mean if having a certain type of uni helps develop their style, then let it be. i think however that it should be pedal driven (prohibiting bc wheels) but if enough intrest arises, have a special category for bc wheels. but if you restrict the type of unicycle, then it could potentially stop the experimenting that street unicycling still needs since its still in its beginning stages. anyways, i think thats enough writing for now, i will write more if i think of more. those are my thoughts john, and i think its awesome that youre doing this. if i could be there to participate in it, i would. unfortunately, funds are short these days, and my trials uni has been broken completely (pretty much every part). you can write a response to mine and disagree or agree with anything. im not attached to these ideas lol. anyways, im off. good luck with this! Kevin -- tugboat - street unicyclist "You won't get hurt if you land it!" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tugboat's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3298 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
hello. i havent replied yet in this thread, but i feel like i should just because im a street rider. im extremely impressed that this type of competition is seriously being considered. i think its important to have a reason for street riders to get together with everyone else seeing as some of us (including me) suck at trials and freestyle and muni haha. but yeah, as for a name for it, i dont think that street freestyle is a good name for it only because of the word "freestyle" in there. street is its own style, it shouldnt be falsly associated with freestyle i dont think. i mean freestyle is strictly a flat ground thing. street isnt. i mean sure theres a lot of moves you could do flat ground and call it street, but not everything. like hopping on the top of the tire i dont consider street. so yeah, not street freestyle, but i think street is what it should be call. thats what its called in every other sport pretty much, so why not in unicycling as well? i know street unicycling gets a lot of insporation from skateboarding, bmxing and inline skating, so why not continue with the name of this type of competition. as for the setup, thats tough. the problem is that the transitions at most skateparks are too steep for unicycles, and the flat parts arent long enough to get at least 2 rotations in (for example on the top of a box that has a ramp going up to it on either side, the flat surface at the top might be 1 and a half rotations which isnt always enough). that isnt to say you can use a skatepark. its saying that you will have to carefully look around to find a skate park that is ideal for unicycling. you will alos have to bring in picnic tables and rails and everything like that. and im sure it wouldnt be tough to make a pretty high and long box and have a set of 7 or 8 stairs going down at the end with a handrail on both sides. you will also have to have an infinite supply of wax. because it will be needed. oh, and i just came up with something. if you want it to be flowy, its tough. mostly because its hard to do tricks without lining them up first. so i think that for any obstacles (mostly stairs or downsloped ledges and rails) that will be used a lot and you need a perfect lineup, there should be markings on the ground as you ride up to them. these will tell you how many revolutions away you are form the obstacle (assuming you are on a 20 inch trials), and it allows you to try to line up a pedal however you wish before you reach the obstacle. and perhaps have different colours for each marking (example: green for 1 rev away, yellow for 2, red for 3) or something like that. anyways, thats just a thought and i think it would work. as for judging or figuring out who wins, same as a skate comp. have like 5 or 6 judges, and kick out the highest and lowest scores and average the others. and the time of each run should be probably 2 minutes. but experiment with that somehow. factors taken into consideration should be consistency, style, technical difficulty, and like how big you go... odnt know how to put that. for safety equipment, i think helmets should be manditory. no helmet, no riding. i know it might seem contradictory for me to say that seeing as i dont always wear mine, but i have begun to a lot more. my whole part in spaced out will not have a helmet, but any other videos that ive filmed for, my helmet has been on 95% of the time. i agree that we should send a sensible message. as for anything else, i agree with "hecklar". it should be the riders choice. i know for myself, i dont wear anything besides a helmet. not because i feel that im safe, but because i feel that they do restrict some movement that you need for flopping aorund more than in trials. the only other people who flop around like street riders are freestyle riders, and they certainly arent wearing any. i bet they couldnt do some of the same stuff with leg armour on, but im sure theyre allowed to (dont know the rules). as well, i bet a lot of people will be using plastic pedals for grinding, and they are a lot more shin friendly than metal ones. another issue, i dont thikn there should be a restriction on the unicycle being used. if they want to ride a 16", let them. if they want to ride a coker with that crazy shifting hub, let them. i mean if having a certain type of uni helps develop their style, then let it be. i think however that it should be pedal driven (prohibiting bc wheels) but if enough intrest arises, have a special category for bc wheels. but if you restrict the type of unicycle, then it could potentially stop the experimenting that street unicycling still needs since its still in its beginning stages. anyways, i think thats enough writing for now, i will write more if i think of more. those are my thoughts john, and i think its awesome that youre doing this. if i could be there to participate in it, i would. unfortunately, funds are short these days, and my trials uni has been broken completely (pretty much every part). you can write a response to mine and disagree or agree with anything. im not attached to these ideas lol. anyways, im off. good luck with this! Kevin -- tugboat - street unicyclist "You won't get hurt if you land it!" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tugboat's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3298 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
More great feedback -- keep it coming! Here's my take on what I'm picking up: Name: Street Freestyle, Street, StreetStyle. So far still variations on the word Street. The people who don't seem to like the word Freestyle appear to be riders who have never watched a Freestyle competition. If we keep it Street Freestyle, it can always be abbreviated to either of the two suggested variations. The existing Freestyle event is not a limiting environment, other than the 11 x 14 meter riding space. Riders have always been free to ride whatever they want, and bring in whatever props they want. Freestyle is not a negative on street. How about Sidewalk Art? My understanding is that in the BMX world the gound-based event is called Flatland Freestyle. Has this changed? We are doing something between flatland and vert. We can't vert very high. But it's still freestyle as well. Judging: Even with existing rules, flowy riding will score better than 50 prehops. No problem there. Tugboat suggests "same as a skate comp." I imagine there are lots of variations on that. I've seen lots of stuff on TV, but never been able to find any detailed rules on the Internet. Anybody know where some are? I'm interested in the *judging criteria*. That is, the specific stuff the judges are looking for. It can't be too loose, or the results of a competition will be based on what that set of judges like, and not necessarily a fixed set of standards. I like the idea of 5 or more judges, and tossing the high and low scores. We are about to make some changes to how we judge Freestyle, and those changes may be incorporated here, but we don't know what those will be yet. For smaller competitions, you might be able to use less judges or some less formal system. I'd like to try for a formal system for MUni Weekend though, to try it out. I like Robbie's idea of everyone having 2 or 3 goes, then narrowing that group down to a set of finalists. I like the finalist idea for most events, but it takes more time. At MUni Weekend I think we'll have the time. Others' thoughts? Venue: Skate park is an interesting option, but is restrictive to event hosts. If you already have access to a skate park that's great. But in Truckee, the one park they have has a no-bikes rule. I don't have the time for this MUni Weekend to try and contact someone, then get permission to ride in there. Much easier to have and control our own riding space, where we can make our own rules and use our own schedule. For future competitions, a skate park might work great. Also, Dan Heaton pointed out that most skate parks are too spread out to make for a good competition. Whatever we do with this event, the audience and entertainment aspects must always be kept in mind. The Lloyd Johnson driveway is not perfect, but it will be the easiest place to set up our comp for MUni Weekend. Time limit: 3 minutes for the finals. If we do prelims, maybe 2 minutes for those. Props: During the development of the event, we'll probably have to keep it pretty open. But I would at least like to give riders a list of what will be available. In future, we might develop a list of required props, that must be built or provided for each competition. This can make the event harder to hold though, so I don't want to make it too restrictive. If there were a minimum list of stuff (to which hosts could add whatever else they have), what would you want on it? I'll start a list: - Grinding rail - Low skinny - High skinny - Ramps - Stairs with platform at top - Low wall (how low?) - High wall (how high?) Safety Gear: Two recommendations for helmets only. One suggested that's what other skate comps use. Is that true? I'm thinking in terms of state-sized competitions and higher, not local stuff. So helmets are a given. Still listening for more opinions on the rest of it. Safety gear too restrictive? We require it for High and Long jump, people have managed some pretty amazing measurements with their safety gear in those. Try some different gear. Remember, if we require kneepads for instance, that will mean you can wear a pair of volleyball pads and be legal. Comfortable, but less protection. At the moment I'm leaning toward just helmets being required, and the rest up to you. Helmets will already be required for anyone riding at Northstar. Other: Tugboat suggested markings on the ground for 1 rev away, 2, etc. This assumes a certain tire diameter, which will not be the same for every rider. I think better for riders to get comfortable with visualizing how much space they'll need. Also no restrictions are planned on the type or number of unicycles used. Got something you want to show on a giraffe? go ahead. BC Wheel? Why not (don't see why it needs to be pedal driven). Show up with a plain old bike or something that doesn't fit the basic "unicycle" assumption and the judges will know what to do. Thanks everyone. -- johnfoss - Walkin' on the edge John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com "Read the rules!" 'IUF Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/rulebook/) 'USA Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/usa/competition/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
More great feedback -- keep it coming! Here's my take on what I'm picking up: Name: Street Freestyle, Street, StreetStyle. So far still variations on the word Street. The people who don't seem to like the word Freestyle appear to be riders who have never watched a Freestyle competition. If we keep it Street Freestyle, it can always be abbreviated to either of the two suggested variations. The existing Freestyle event is not a limiting environment, other than the 11 x 14 meter riding space. Riders have always been free to ride whatever they want, and bring in whatever props they want. Freestyle is not a negative on street. How about Sidewalk Art? My understanding is that in the BMX world the gound-based event is called Flatland Freestyle. Has this changed? We are doing something between flatland and vert. We can't vert very high. But it's still freestyle as well. Judging: Even with existing rules, flowy riding will score better than 50 prehops. No problem there. Tugboat suggests "same as a skate comp." I imagine there are lots of variations on that. I've seen lots of stuff on TV, but never been able to find any detailed rules on the Internet. Anybody know where some are? I'm interested in the *judging criteria*. That is, the specific stuff the judges are looking for. It can't be too loose, or the results of a competition will be based on what that set of judges like, and not necessarily a fixed set of standards. I like the idea of 5 or more judges, and tossing the high and low scores. We are about to make some changes to how we judge Freestyle, and those changes may be incorporated here, but we don't know what those will be yet. For smaller competitions, you might be able to use less judges or some less formal system. I'd like to try for a formal system for MUni Weekend though, to try it out. I like Robbie's idea of everyone having 2 or 3 goes, then narrowing that group down to a set of finalists. I like the finalist idea for most events, but it takes more time. At MUni Weekend I think we'll have the time. Others' thoughts? Venue: Skate park is an interesting option, but is restrictive to event hosts. If you already have access to a skate park that's great. But in Truckee, the one park they have has a no-bikes rule. I don't have the time for this MUni Weekend to try and contact someone, then get permission to ride in there. Much easier to have and control our own riding space, where we can make our own rules and use our own schedule. For future competitions, a skate park might work great. Also, Dan Heaton pointed out that most skate parks are too spread out to make for a good competition. Whatever we do with this event, the audience and entertainment aspects must always be kept in mind. The Lloyd Johnson driveway is not perfect, but it will be the easiest place to set up our comp for MUni Weekend. Time limit: 3 minutes for the finals. If we do prelims, maybe 2 minutes for those. Props: During the development of the event, we'll probably have to keep it pretty open. But I would at least like to give riders a list of what will be available. In future, we might develop a list of required props, that must be built or provided for each competition. This can make the event harder to hold though, so I don't want to make it too restrictive. If there were a minimum list of stuff (to which hosts could add whatever else they have), what would you want on it? I'll start a list: - Grinding rail - Low skinny - High skinny - Ramps - Stairs with platform at top - Low wall (how low?) - High wall (how high?) Safety Gear: Two recommendations for helmets only. One suggested that's what other skate comps use. Is that true? I'm thinking in terms of state-sized competitions and higher, not local stuff. So helmets are a given. Still listening for more opinions on the rest of it. Safety gear too restrictive? We require it for High and Long jump, people have managed some pretty amazing measurements with their safety gear in those. Try some different gear. Remember, if we require kneepads for instance, that will mean you can wear a pair of volleyball pads and be legal. Comfortable, but less protection. At the moment I'm leaning toward just helmets being required, and the rest up to you. Helmets will already be required for anyone riding at Northstar. Other: Tugboat suggested markings on the ground for 1 rev away, 2, etc. This assumes a certain tire diameter, which will not be the same for every rider. I think better for riders to get comfortable with visualizing how much space they'll need. Also no restrictions are planned on the type or number of unicycles used. Got something you want to show on a giraffe? go ahead. BC Wheel? Why not (don't see why it needs to be pedal driven). Show up with a plain old bike or something that doesn't fit the basic "unicycle" assumption and the judges will know what to do. Thanks everyone. -- johnfoss - Walkin' on the edge John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com "Read the rules!" 'IUF Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/rulebook/) 'USA Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/usa/competition/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
More great feedback -- keep it coming! Here's my take on what I'm picking up: Name: Street Freestyle, Street, StreetStyle. So far still variations on the word Street. The people who don't seem to like the word Freestyle appear to be riders who have never watched a Freestyle competition. If we keep it Street Freestyle, it can always be abbreviated to either of the two suggested variations. The existing Freestyle event is not a limiting environment, other than the 11 x 14 meter riding space. Riders have always been free to ride whatever they want, and bring in whatever props they want. Freestyle is not a negative on street. How about Sidewalk Art? My understanding is that in the BMX world the gound-based event is called Flatland Freestyle. Has this changed? We are doing something between flatland and vert. We can't vert very high. But it's still freestyle as well. Judging: Even with existing rules, flowy riding will score better than 50 prehops. No problem there. Tugboat suggests "same as a skate comp." I imagine there are lots of variations on that. I've seen lots of stuff on TV, but never been able to find any detailed rules on the Internet. Anybody know where some are? I'm interested in the *judging criteria*. That is, the specific stuff the judges are looking for. It can't be too loose, or the results of a competition will be based on what that set of judges like, and not necessarily a fixed set of standards. I like the idea of 5 or more judges, and tossing the high and low scores. We are about to make some changes to how we judge Freestyle, and those changes may be incorporated here, but we don't know what those will be yet. For smaller competitions, you might be able to use less judges or some less formal system. I'd like to try for a formal system for MUni Weekend though, to try it out. I like Robbie's idea of everyone having 2 or 3 goes, then narrowing that group down to a set of finalists. I like the finalist idea for most events, but it takes more time. At MUni Weekend I think we'll have the time. Others' thoughts? Venue: Skate park is an interesting option, but is restrictive to event hosts. If you already have access to a skate park that's great. But in Truckee, the one park they have has a no-bikes rule. I don't have the time for this MUni Weekend to try and contact someone, then get permission to ride in there. Much easier to have and control our own riding space, where we can make our own rules and use our own schedule. For future competitions, a skate park might work great. Also, Dan Heaton pointed out that most skate parks are too spread out to make for a good competition. Whatever we do with this event, the audience and entertainment aspects must always be kept in mind. The Lloyd Johnson driveway is not perfect, but it will be the easiest place to set up our comp for MUni Weekend. Time limit: 3 minutes for the finals. If we do prelims, maybe 2 minutes for those. Props: During the development of the event, we'll probably have to keep it pretty open. But I would at least like to give riders a list of what will be available. In future, we might develop a list of required props, that must be built or provided for each competition. This can make the event harder to hold though, so I don't want to make it too restrictive. If there were a minimum list of stuff (to which hosts could add whatever else they have), what would you want on it? I'll start a list: - Grinding rail - Low skinny - High skinny - Ramps - Stairs with platform at top - Low wall (how low?) - High wall (how high?) Safety Gear: Two recommendations for helmets only. One suggested that's what other skate comps use. Is that true? I'm thinking in terms of state-sized competitions and higher, not local stuff. So helmets are a given. Still listening for more opinions on the rest of it. Safety gear too restrictive? We require it for High and Long jump, people have managed some pretty amazing measurements with their safety gear in those. Try some different gear. Remember, if we require kneepads for instance, that will mean you can wear a pair of volleyball pads and be legal. Comfortable, but less protection. At the moment I'm leaning toward just helmets being required, and the rest up to you. Helmets will already be required for anyone riding at Northstar. Other: Tugboat suggested markings on the ground for 1 rev away, 2, etc. This assumes a certain tire diameter, which will not be the same for every rider. I think better for riders to get comfortable with visualizing how much space they'll need. Also no restrictions are planned on the type or number of unicycles used. Got something you want to show on a giraffe? go ahead. BC Wheel? Why not (don't see why it needs to be pedal driven). Show up with a plain old bike or something that doesn't fit the basic "unicycle" assumption and the judges will know what to do. Thanks everyone. -- johnfoss - Walkin' on the edge John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com "Read the rules!" 'IUF Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/rulebook/) 'USA Rulebook' (http://www.unicycling.org/usa/competition/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
First off the name, Just call it a street comp. Everyone will know what your talking about and adding freestyle or anything else just makes the name longer than it needs to be. Right now there is not a drastic enough difference in the types of street riding going on to qualify for the seperation of different events. Saftey Gear. My vote is for mandatory helmets and everything else to be optional. If it is felt that knee/shin is needed I would go along with that however I feel that wrist guards are limiting to alot of needed movement in order to grip your seat properly. Scoring. I will get back to at a later date. -- Checkernuts - Me Fail English? That's Unpossible No one said it was gonna be easy and I'm not afraid to try, with the odds stacked up against me I will have to fight, One Life One Wheel got to do it right. H20 My circus train pulls throught the night, full of lions and trapize artists, I'm done with elephants and clowns, I want to runaway and join the office. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Checkernuts's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/801 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
First off the name, Just call it a street comp. Everyone will know what your talking about and adding freestyle or anything else just makes the name longer than it needs to be. Right now there is not a drastic enough difference in the types of street riding going on to qualify for the seperation of different events. Saftey Gear. My vote is for mandatory helmets and everything else to be optional. If it is felt that knee/shin is needed I would go along with that however I feel that wrist guards are limiting to alot of needed movement in order to grip your seat properly. Scoring. I will get back to at a later date. -- Checkernuts - Me Fail English? That's Unpossible No one said it was gonna be easy and I'm not afraid to try, with the odds stacked up against me I will have to fight, One Life One Wheel got to do it right. H20 My circus train pulls throught the night, full of lions and trapize artists, I'm done with elephants and clowns, I want to runaway and join the office. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Checkernuts's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/801 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
First off the name, Just call it a street comp. Everyone will know what your talking about and adding freestyle or anything else just makes the name longer than it needs to be. Right now there is not a drastic enough difference in the types of street riding going on to qualify for the seperation of different events. Saftey Gear. My vote is for mandatory helmets and everything else to be optional. If it is felt that knee/shin is needed I would go along with that however I feel that wrist guards are limiting to alot of needed movement in order to grip your seat properly. Scoring. I will get back to at a later date. -- Checkernuts - Me Fail English? That's Unpossible No one said it was gonna be easy and I'm not afraid to try, with the odds stacked up against me I will have to fight, One Life One Wheel got to do it right. H20 My circus train pulls throught the night, full of lions and trapize artists, I'm done with elephants and clowns, I want to runaway and join the office. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Checkernuts's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/801 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I agree the comp should be called 'Street'. I've seen freestyle comps, but I think Street is just a cooler name. tugboat wrote: * for any obstacles (mostly stairs or downsloped ledges and rails) that will be used a lot and you need a perfect lineup, there should be markings on the ground as you ride up to them. these will tell you how many revolutions away you are form the obstacle (assuming you are on a 20 inch trials), and it allows you to try to line up a pedal however you wish before you reach the obstacle. * An interesting idea, and could lead to more flowing riding. (I certainly like to line grinds up before I do them, so not having to ride backwards from the rail then forward into it would be good.) Usually before skate comps there is a practise session for the riders to get warmed up and try out the course. During this time you could suss out this kind of thing. John - the flatlanders I know in Auckland call their sport 'flatland' not 'flatland freestyle'. +0|\|- -- TonyMelton - Skinny butt Three new albums added to 'my photo gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albur10). Check it! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TonyMelton's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/2118 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I agree the comp should be called 'Street'. I've seen freestyle comps, but I think Street is just a cooler name. tugboat wrote: * for any obstacles (mostly stairs or downsloped ledges and rails) that will be used a lot and you need a perfect lineup, there should be markings on the ground as you ride up to them. these will tell you how many revolutions away you are form the obstacle (assuming you are on a 20 inch trials), and it allows you to try to line up a pedal however you wish before you reach the obstacle. * An interesting idea, and could lead to more flowing riding. (I certainly like to line grinds up before I do them, so not having to ride backwards from the rail then forward into it would be good.) Usually before skate comps there is a practise session for the riders to get warmed up and try out the course. During this time you could suss out this kind of thing. John - the flatlanders I know in Auckland call their sport 'flatland' not 'flatland freestyle'. +0|\|- -- TonyMelton - Skinny butt Three new albums added to 'my photo gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albur10). Check it! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TonyMelton's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/2118 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34600 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Postal not seeing value to sponsorship... why? | Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles | Racing | 170 | May 13th 04 11:48 PM |
Cycling to work banned | James Annan | UK | 84 | January 30th 04 05:54 PM |
what is a good bag for taking clothes to work without wrinkling them | Cory | General | 11 | October 16th 03 12:36 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
FAQ | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 27 | September 5th 03 10:58 PM |