|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
are 12-21 clusters are stupid?
I was reading (I think) Frank Berto's "The Dancing Chain" book last
weekend, and it mentioned some efficiency research that Berto did with 3-speed hubs, 7-speed hubs, and regular derailleur bikes. If I remember correctly, drivetrain energy loss was about 3-5% for derailleurs, and 5-7% for internally geared hubs. More interesting than this was a statement that the highest losses on derailleur bikes came from 13-tooth cogs. The results implied that using a 13-tooth cog was tanamount to using a Sturmey Archer 3-speed hub. And Berto asserted that this is why 14-28 rear clusters are so popular on road bikes of the 1970's and 1980's. Has anything changed ? Are 13-tooth (and 12-tooth (and 11-tooth)) cogs only 90-92% efficient? - Don Gillies San Diego, CA |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
are 12-21 clusters are stupid?
Donald Gillies wrote: I was reading (I think) Frank Berto's "The Dancing Chain" book last weekend, and it mentioned some efficiency research that Berto did with 3-speed hubs, 7-speed hubs, and regular derailleur bikes. If I remember correctly, drivetrain energy loss was about 3-5% for derailleurs, and 5-7% for internally geared hubs. More interesting than this was a statement that the highest losses on derailleur bikes came from 13-tooth cogs. The results implied that using a 13-tooth cog was tanamount to using a Sturmey Archer 3-speed hub. And Berto asserted that this is why 14-28 rear clusters are so popular on road bikes of the 1970's and 1980's. Has anything changed ? Are 13-tooth (and 12-tooth (and 11-tooth)) cogs only 90-92% efficient? - Don Gillies San Diego, CA There's an inherent relationship between cog size and mechanical drag, since the chain links have to rotate further on their pins the smaller the cog gets. In actual usage, however, if you are in the 53-11 and pedaling at a decent cadence, the speed would be high enough so that the mechanical drag would be trivial compared to aerodynamic drag. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
are 12-21 clusters are stupid?
Good answer... but as i said before... if are not strong enough doesnt
matter it will be less eficient hehehe... common sense right? :P cya There's an inherent relationship between cog size and mechanical drag, since the chain links have to rotate further on their pins the smaller the cog gets. In actual usage, however, if you are in the 53-11 and pedaling at a decent cadence, the speed would be high enough so that the mechanical drag would be trivial compared to aerodynamic drag. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leave Ed Alone, It's Not Him,he's not Johnny NoCom | Not Johnny NoCom | Recumbent Biking | 133 | January 5th 05 04:44 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ ylojceq | Tom Kunich | Rides | 672 | December 3rd 04 06:49 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! | TBGibb | Rides | 0 | November 28th 04 07:57 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! | TBGibb | Rides | 0 | November 28th 04 07:57 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ylojceq | Paul Cassel | Rides | 0 | November 7th 04 11:16 PM |