stop all bike paths etc please!!

On 10 Dec 2007 18:59:45 -0800, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 10 Dec 2007 10:01:33 -0800, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:12:14 GMT, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

"Edward Dolan" writes:

"Bill Z." wrote in message
...
"Edward Dolan" writes:
I will treat you with the contempt you deserve unless and until you cease
and desist from your snipping mania. snip

F___ off, asshole. Your tripe is being snipped because contains nothing
worth repeating.

This is FAR more worth repeating than anything you have EVER said:


Vandeman is getting testy because he's been shown to be a fool so
many times.

Not yet. There's no one capable of that in Usenet. Or probably
anywhere else.

rest of his posts on this thread that appeared today ignored - he's
just trying to get some attention.

Bill conveniently snips the parts that nail him -- like Nixon erasing
the presidential tapes, or the CIA destroying the videos of their
torture sessions.

Vandeman is a liar

Your nose is growing.

- nothing in his idiot post "nailed" anyone. It's
just mindless bantar and the sort of insults that went out of style
by the time most of us graduated from 8th grade.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 10 Dec 2007 18:59:45 -0800, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 10 Dec 2007 10:01:33 -0800, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Vandeman is a liar

Your nose is growing.

Are you capable of anything other than lies?


--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

"Chris" wrote in message
05.47...
"Edward Dolan" wrote in
news:7pGdnUFTx_LqosTanZ2dnUVZ_rqlnZ2d@prairiewave. com:
[...]
That is the liberal solution to all problems - palaver and sanctions
(neither of which ever work). It is far better to go in and just
kill
all the *******s.

I feel same way about you

Yeah, but I say it so much better than you, don't I?

I'm sure you feel that way. If by 'better' you mean, using 100 words
when 1 will do, you do it much better than I do. If by 'better' you
mean to blather on and on about something nobody but you cares about,
then you do it far 'better' than I do. Enjoy you self importance.

Consistency is the quality that matters most to me. Some of your posts are
well written and others aren't. I believe all of my posts come up to a
certain minimal standard. Further, you do not seem to care what your posts
LOOK like irrespective of what you say. This indicates to me the lack of an
esthetic. Just because you are an electrical engineer does not mean that you
can neglect how things look.

Tom Sherman is an interesting example of an engineer who cares what his
posts look like. He takes some pains with his messages. I think we owe that
much to our readers, no matter who they may be. Always remember one thing,
the entire world can read what we write here on Usenet. That thought humbles
me, but apparently not you.

Most of us here on Usenet could use a remedial course in English composition
and I do not exclude myself either.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"Edward Dolan" wrote in
newsbqdnVVmmIavkv3anZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@prairiewave. com:


"Chris" wrote in message
05.47...
"Edward Dolan" wrote in
news:7pGdnUFTx_LqosTanZ2dnUVZ_rqlnZ2d@prairiewave. com:
[...]
That is the liberal solution to all problems - palaver and
sanctions (neither of which ever work). It is far better to go in
and just
kill
all the *******s.

I feel same way about you

Yeah, but I say it so much better than you, don't I?

I'm sure you feel that way. If by 'better' you mean, using 100 words
when 1 will do, you do it much better than I do. If by 'better' you
mean to blather on and on about something nobody but you cares about,
then you do it far 'better' than I do. Enjoy you self importance.

Consistency is the quality that matters most to me. Some of your posts
are well written and others aren't. I believe all of my posts come up
to a certain minimal standard. Further, you do not seem to care what
your posts LOOK like irrespective of what you say. This indicates to
me the lack of an esthetic. Just because you are an electrical
engineer does not mean that you can neglect how things look.

Tom Sherman is an interesting example of an engineer who cares what
his posts look like. He takes some pains with his messages. I think we
owe that much to our readers, no matter who they may be. Always
remember one thing, the entire world can read what we write here on
Usenet. That thought humbles me, but apparently not you.

Most of us here on Usenet could use a remedial course in English
composition and I do not exclude myself either.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota



You consistently blather on and on about topics nobody cares about. You
should give your self a Gold Start for consistency, pin it on your shirt
and feel very self important.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Chris" wrote in message
05.47...
"Edward Dolan" wrote in
newsbqdnVVmmIavkv3anZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@prairiewave. com:
[...]
Consistency is the quality that matters most to me. Some of your posts
are well written and others aren't. I believe all of my posts come up
to a certain minimal standard. Further, you do not seem to care what
your posts LOOK like irrespective of what you say. This indicates to
me the lack of an esthetic. Just because you are an electrical
engineer does not mean that you can neglect how things look.

Tom Sherman is an interesting example of an engineer who cares what
his posts look like. He takes some pains with his messages. I think we
owe that much to our readers, no matter who they may be. Always
remember one thing, the entire world can read what we write here on
Usenet. That thought humbles me, but apparently not you.

Most of us here on Usenet could use a remedial course in English
composition and I do not exclude myself either.

You consistently blather on and on about topics nobody cares about. You
should give your self [yourself] a Gold Start [Star] for consistency, pin
it on your shirt
and feel very self important [self-important].

Admittedly, I am not much here for any specific content. I never have been
and I never will be. Think of me as the guy who sweeps up all the horse ****
after the parade has gone by. Also, when a newsgroup has almost expired from
terminal boredom I know how to bring it back to life. Not everyone can do
what I do. You should appreciate me for the qualities that I bring to a
newsgroup and not be so picky about content, ever the province of small
minds.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Nov 16, 6:51 pm, "Papa Tom" wrote:

And why should they,
when the rules of safe automobile driving are so universally ignored?

You've gone around the bend... there are NOT separate rules for autos
& cycles (either kind the regular or the pussy kind with motors:-)

But, there is also a fundamental truth to what you are saying, if we
don't hold people accountable to the law when they're piloting a
military assault vehicle why should we worry about what they do on
their bikes? Of course if the president (or the quarterback, or point
guard for that matter) isn't held to the rule of law why should
anybody be. I mean what's a little drunken driving among friends;-/
So we've become a society where people routinely break the laws -
barbarous as it were. And we're proud of it, that's why the
emasculated military vehicles sell so well, people demonstrate their
rugged individualism by they things they buy, because they really
don't want to do things differently (jeeze, everybody drives a car,
you must be a real nutter to go 'round on a bike).

If we sterilized bad drivers and other posers we would be shut of this
foul behavior in a few short generations.