Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes

On 6/13/2011 4:30 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In articleAsKdnUP8kd7SsWvQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

You can excoriate him regularly and be more obsessed
with him than any fanboy, and you do.

And still not be a fanboy, Moron.

In article ,
BL wrote:

On 6/13/2011 4:30 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In articleAsKdnUP8kd7SsWvQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

You can excoriate him regularly and be more obsessed
with him than any fanboy, and you do.

And still not be a fanboy, Moron.

All those fanboys live in your head;
their cheers run through an inverter,
and emitted as your fantasies.
If it were not for LANCE fanboys you would
have nothing to live for. We own you.

--
Old Fritz

On 6/13/2011 7:11 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In articleT7idnR4f8cWfGGvQnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:

On 6/13/2011 4:30 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In articleAsKdnUP8kd7SsWvQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

You can excoriate him regularly and be more obsessed
with him than any fanboy, and you do.

And still not be a fanboy, Moron.

All those fanboys live in your head;
their cheers run through an inverter,
and emitted as your fantasies.
If it were not for LANCE fanboys you would
have nothing to live for. We own you.

ROTFL!! You're not in my head, Fanboy. You're just one of the morons
who have destroyed rbr over the years. **** like you always floats to
the top. :-)

On Jun 12, 11:28 pm, Marco wrote:

What I don't really get is why you think it's necessary to parrot back
to rbr things you learn from lurking twitter accounts or in the cn
clinic. It's particularly lame when you are "reporting" things that
have been known by many/most for a long time.

It's even more lame when he's parroting other parrots (parroting by
proxy?),
like that Mormon accounting "fraud expert".

Try again, Fanboy.

I'm a Fan of Boy Van Poppel.

On 6/13/2011 7:50 AM, BL wrote:
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/87...-argument.aspx


When you post links to stories like this, I become conflicted. On the
one hand, I kind of understand why you hope and pray to see Armstrong
successfully prosecuted and get ****ed up the ass. On the other hand,
it's TYLER ****ING HAMILTON. I would pay money to see that lying, smarmy
weasel's ass kicked.

If LA actually got Tyler out to the parking lot it'd put Albright/Trdina
to shame. In some ways. I'll bet it wouldn't look much different.

On 6/13/2011 1:25 PM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article
,
Fredmaster of wrote:

It's almost as if Lafferty wants a Twitter feed of his own
for his obsessions, but hasn't figured out how to sign up
for one, so he just tweets to us in rbr instead.

I'd sign him up myself except on Twitter Lafferty
cannot call his respondents ****tards.


You'd get a million followers with ****laffertysays. Do it. Make
millions. It is my gift to you.

On 6/13/2011 7:26 AM, BL wrote:
On 6/12/2011 11:28 PM, Marco wrote:
On Jun 12, 1:11 pm, wrote:
Tyler was in town to host a ride for the Outside in Aspen. It was
organized by Outside magazine. There was a bunch of people from Outside
magazine in the bar watching it unfold. Tyler actually tried to give
Lance the bro-hug and lance brushed him off. Tyler didn't take it that
well, was shook up by
it.http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthr...12137&page=265

http://twitter.com/#!/GraysonSchaffer

Also, it seems that Haven's new boyfriend is also Levi's new lawyer.
Small world.

What I don't really get is why you think it's necessary to parrot back
to rbr things you learn from lurking twiiter accounts or in the cn
clinic. It's particularly lame when you are "reporting" things that
have been known by many/most for a long time. And even if not widely
known, do you really think people here care? What is your point? Did
you see yourself clearly in Papp's comment in the PZ thread about the
strange people who get so emotionally invested in this scenario when
it has practically zero impact on their lives? Serious question... how
many hours do you think you have spent on the internet reading or
writing about Lance's doping? (I guess I don't really expect you will
answer that.)
Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

The problem is that you've never been able to distinguish between the
set of people who are Lance fan boys (pretty small on RBR) and the set
of people who think Lafferty is an asshole (it's unanimous).

"BL" wrote in message
...
On 6/13/2011 12:50 PM, William R. Mattil wrote:
On 6/13/2011 10:27 AM, BL wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy.
There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad.
;-)


On a hunch I ran this through Babelfish in an attempt to get a
translation for it. Interesting ..............

What it means is that anyone not in favor of lynching LA and not
agreeing with Laff is a fanboi


Pretty broad brush there Brian.


Bill
Try again, Fanboy.

Perhaps you could provide your own definition? This 20 questions things
gets a bit old, plus there's no way of knowing if you're defining it
dynamically. How about a solid June 13, 2011 definition of Lance Fanboy?

Thanks-

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

Jimmy July wrote in :

The problem is that you've never been able to distinguish between the
set of people who are Lance fan boys (pretty small on RBR) and the set
of people who think Lafferty is an asshole (it's unanimous).

Can't I go with dillweed?

--
Bill Fred