If there is any good to come out of this crisis, let it be a cyclingrevolution - LONG

On Monday, August 10, 2020 at 2:52:28 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 10/08/2020 14:31, Simon Mason wrote:

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incomin...-Lowestoft.jpg

A shame the insurance company will have to pay for the car. Pity we
don't know the road so that we could look at what the driver thought
he/she was seeing.

Usually a "low flying Sun" - that's the typical wriggle they use in court after killing someone.

On 10/08/2020 14:54, Simon Mason wrote:
On Monday, August 10, 2020 at 2:52:28 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 10/08/2020 14:31, Simon Mason wrote:

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incomin...-Lowestoft.jpg

A shame the insurance company will have to pay for the car. Pity
we don't know the road so that we could look at what the driver
thought he/she was seeing.

Usually a "low flying Sun" - that's the typical wriggle they use in
court after killing someone.

I believe the Duke of Edinburgh decided to hand back his licence before
trying to defend that one.

On 14:22 10 Aug 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Monday, August 10, 2020 at 12:58:18 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Also known as lycra louts.

Fortunately, the proposed changes to the Highway Code impose greater
responsibility on lycra louts and also advises them of their place in
the hierarchy of road users. See:

Thugs in souped up cars, AKA boy racers, are right at the bottom of the
heap.

Simon, you're a nice enough chap but always prone to displaying to irrelevant
schadenfreude towards car drivers whenever you need to defend bad behaviour
by cyclists.

Let's face it, car drivers are not naturally hostile towards most other road
users. If car drivers and cyclist have an enmity then it might have more to
do with the attitude of cyclists than anything else. Just saying.