Unibet ain't a sure thing

Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.

Tom Kunich wrote:
Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.


Unibet were Mr Bookmaker.

Tom Kunich wrote:
Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.




No, Lotto was never available over the Internet to France. Unibet,
however, can be accessed in France over the Internet.

That's why Unibet's exclusion is both unique and justified under French law.

Thanks,

Magilla

On Mar 11, 10:16 am, MagillaGorilla wrote:

No, Lotto was never available over the Internet to France. Unibet,
however, can be accessed in France over the Internet.

That's why Unibet's exclusion is both unique and justified under French law.

Thanks,

Magilla

I would like to know however why "bet and win" doesn't have a problem.
This picture is from a soccer game last fall:
http://www.uefa.com/competitions/ucl...togallery.htmx
(click on Next to see the pic where ad is visible).

Milan has bwin ad on the jersey and played in Lille, France.

bjorn

On Mar 11, 9:16 am, MagillaGorilla wrote:


No, Lotto was never available over the Internet to France. Unibet,
however, can be accessed in France over the Internet.

That's why Unibet's exclusion is both unique and justified under French law.

Thanks,

Magilla

Hey dumbape;

http://www.lotto.be/pages/show.aspx?...cache=33919f2a

Also in French, Flemish, and German.

On Mar 11, 1:16 pm, MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.

No, Lotto was never available over the Internet to France. Unibet,
however, can be accessed in France over the Internet.

That's why Unibet's exclusion is both unique and justified under French law.


dumbass,

it wasn't a problem in 2006.

On 3/11/07 1:07 PM, in article
,
" wrote:

On Mar 11, 9:16 am, MagillaGorilla wrote:


No, Lotto was never available over the Internet to France. Unibet,
however, can be accessed in France over the Internet.

That's why Unibet's exclusion is both unique and justified under French law.

Thanks,

Magilla

Hey dumbape;

http://www.lotto.be/pages/show.aspx?...cache=33919f2a

Also in French, Flemish, and German.




Now buy a ticket.

Being able to the the results of a national lottery is not the same as being
able to play it.




--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash

On Mar 10, 11:58 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.

I was at the prologue of Paris-Nice today. I noted that Agritubel had
a huge bus, though
I seem to recall that they had one of the smaller camper type buses in
years past. With
only this as evidence, I conjecture that Agritubel radically increased
its sponsorship this year
by getting assurance of participation from ASO to all their events.
This means that there wasn't
room for another team, and they chose Unibet.

-ilan

On Mar 11, 8:37 pm, "ilan" wrote:
On Mar 10, 11:58 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.

I was at the prologue of Paris-Nice today. I noted that Agritubel had
a huge bus, though
I seem to recall that they had one of the smaller camper type buses in
years past. With
only this as evidence, I conjecture that Agritubel radically increased
its sponsorship this year
by getting assurance of participation from ASO to all their events.
This means that there wasn't
room for another team, and they chose Unibet.

dumbass,

the heart of the matter is that the UCI sold a bunch of teams protour
licenses with the guarantee that this would be the ticket into all the
big races and handed that list to the ASO.

of course the ASO is going to be indignant, and the law they are
citing is merely a pretense for excluding Unibet. what they are saying
without having the balls to say it is "only we're going to choose who
rides in our races".

what unibet should've done is gone around to the organizers and gotten
guarantees (what astana did and what tinkoff did for the giro) instead
of falling for the UCI con job.

"Dan Gregory" wrote in message
...
Tom Kunich wrote:
Can anyone suggest why Unibet is having such a problem and Lotto isn't?
Wasn't there another betting agency that sponsored a B team as well? They
were racing all over France if memory serves and they were available over
the internet at that time.


Unibet were Mr Bookmaker.

Ahh, yes, it also appears that Mr. Bookmaker was only unwanted after they
turned down sponsoring ASO.