Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but drivers brazenlyflout ban

On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Quote properly, who wrote what above?

--
An Ohio teen has pleaded innocent to stealing his mother's credit card to pay for a friend's breast enlargement surgery.
Police say it's lucky they caught the guy quickly; otherwise, it may have turned into a bigger bust.

On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:28:00 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.05.2017 08:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.

So why do you care so much?

You're the one that replied to it.

You are the one who posted it.
Anything posted on usenet is fair game for comment.

There's a difference between comment and childish comment.

--
You can get by on good looks and charm for about fifteen minutes.
After that, you'd better have a big dick or nice tits.

On 31.05.2017 08:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I meant 99% of the civilised population.

Thank God I am uncivilised by your definition.
I suppose you are civilised. I have absolutely no desire to be like you.

It really is a very great compliment to be called uncivilsed by YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

On 31.05.2017 08:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
There's a difference between comment and childish comment.

What?

It really is a very great compliment to be called childish by YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

On 31.05.2017 08:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Quote properly, who wrote what above?

You tell me.
And will quote improperly whenever I like to make my point.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Why are you replying to me pretending to reply to you? Please read the instructions for your newsreader.

--
Mary had a little lamb, it walked into a pylon. 10,000 volts went up its arse, and turned its wool to nylon.

On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Now you're posting the same thing twice. Stick to something simpler than a computer, like a bicycle.

--
The only intuitive user interface is the nipple.

On 05.06.2017 09:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Why are you replying to me pretending to reply to you? Please read the
instructions for your newsreader.


I am replying to your lame sig joke.
Anything that appears in your message is fair game. Including "sigs".

On 05.06.2017 09:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Now you're posting the same thing twice. Stick to something simpler
than a computer, like a bicycle.

I really do not give a **** what you think.

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:14:25 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 05.06.2017 09:35, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:26:39 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

So why the hell did you include it?

Now you're posting the same thing twice. Stick to something simpler
than a computer, like a bicycle.

I really do not give a **** what you think.

Thinking is beyond your ability, best not to think about other people's thoughts.

--
****head Simon saw sexy Sheila sucking Stephen's stiff sperm sausage softly, so Simon sucked
Stuart's super sized sexrod savagely. Several sluts saw Stuart spraying spunk, soaking Sarah's
stockings severely. Sarah swiftly smacked Stuart's shaft sideways, sending Stuart's sticky spitting semen
sensationally soaring.