You'd never buy a bike and ride it in traffic

On Apr 20, 2:15*am, Jens Müller wrote:
On 17.04.2009 19:09, ComandanteBanana wrote:

'Pete Gauntlett, traffic section commander for the Orlando Police
Department, worries that they could cause severe traffic accidents
with traditional automobiles.

"I think the vehicle certainly has its place in limited residential
areas and gated communities," he says.

ACK, I think the use of automobiles should be restricted to company
campusses and gated communities ... Very smart, that guy.

Right, a "toy" for the upper crusts in gated communities, to be kept
away from the mundane people in unfriendly neighborhoods,

Talk about "democracy"... ?

On Apr 20, 2:14*am, (Tom Keats) wrote:
In article ,
* * * * KingOfTheApes writes:

On Apr 16, 9:05 pm, (Tom Keats) wrote:

It would be easy to design a tandem-seat enclosed vehicle that weighed
700 lbs or so, but it would need four wheels to be stable, and it would
never have a hope of passing US automotive crash tests--but why does
anyone give a **** about that???

Golf carts. *But they're not very fast, which evokes the
question: does speed capability enhance safety? *I suspect
the opposite is true, but I'm afraid I can't prove it right
now with cites & refs. *So I guess I'm just full of BS on
this particular point.

Good point. I think you hit the nail by accident (since you don't seem
to be that smart).

At least I know of which postings to threadedly respond.

And the whole world's onto your anti-bicycling game and
fearmongering campaign, but you're too blindly
dough-headed to realize it.

Pack it in yer suitcase.

I guess if you pop your head outa yer ass, and you see your
shadow, we'll get at least six more weeks of your bull****.

--
Nothing is safe from me.
I'm really at:
tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca

Nothing is safe from you.

The world better watch out for dimwitted people like you.

Or do you have an agenda? Maybe it's malice after all.