|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
hi, is there an easy way to determine proper stem length (assuming you
already have the correct size frame)? maybe an approximate angle your elbows should be bent when on the hoods/drops? also, is there an easy way to determine proper seat fore/aft position on the rails? maybe a certain length behind the bb, or is it just based on feel? thanks! |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
wrote in message ups.com... hi, is there an easy way to determine proper stem length (assuming you already have the correct size frame)? maybe an approximate angle your elbows should be bent when on the hoods/drops? also, is there an easy way to determine proper seat fore/aft position on the rails? maybe a certain length behind the bb, or is it just based on feel? thanks! A quick guide to stem length. when holding the drops the bars should approximately obscure the centre of the front hub, this is normally a fairly decent starting position. as for seat fore and aft whatever comfortable should do it, a combination of both the previous should sort you out but I try and keep the seat fairly central then sort out the stem length. cheers Jon_H |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
Peter Cole wrote: wrote: hi, is there an easy way to determine proper stem length (assuming you already have the correct size frame)? maybe an approximate angle your elbows should be bent when on the hoods/drops? also, is there an easy way to determine proper seat fore/aft position on the rails? maybe a certain length behind the bb, or is it just based on feel? thanks! I think that both are based on feel & comfort. Since those 2 factors are so related, I think it makes the most sense to set your "effective seat tube angle" with the saddle fore/aft position, then get a stem that's a comfortable height & reach. General rule is the flatter you want your back, the steeper your seat tube angle needs to be. Just the opposite, as the ST gets steeper, and the position of the saddle in reference to the seatpost stays the same, the rider will get closer to the hbars, making them more upright BUT KOPS, a small and variable 'constant' will indirectly measure femur length and also determine 'best' seatube angle. After finding this and height of the saddle, then the top tube, stem lengths can be determined along with Hbar width..these depending on the rider's needs, desires, flexibility, etc. Both Keith Bontrager and Gary Klein disagree with the use of KOPS and present some pretty reasonable arguments: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/kops.html http://web.archive.org/web/19980201073043/www.kleinbikes.com/Technology/Myth/Knee_Over.html Bontrager seems to concentrate on climbing (seated and standing) positions, while Klein is more about just locating rider CG to BB distance (independent of KOPS) for comfortable seated riding. I tend to favor the Klein approach, locating my CG first with the saddle position (given that I can't change my seat tube angle), then setting bar height and reach with the stem choice to get the right cockpit length and bar height. It's been somewhat of a moving target though as over the years I've wanted to get my back flatter which closes up my hips too much (thighs hit ribs), so I've been forced to a more forward saddle position and longer reach stems. I find that spending a few hours total on the trainer spread out over a few days is the only way to get things really dialed in. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:41:53 -0500, Peter Cole wrote:
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote: Peter Cole wrote: wrote: hi, is there an easy way to determine proper stem length (assuming you already have the correct size frame)? maybe an approximate angle your elbows should be bent when on the hoods/drops? also, is there an easy way to determine proper seat fore/aft position on the rails? maybe a certain length behind the bb, or is it just based on feel? thanks! I think that both are based on feel & comfort. Since those 2 factors are so related, I think it makes the most sense to set your "effective seat tube angle" with the saddle fore/aft position, then get a stem that's a comfortable height & reach. General rule is the flatter you want your back, the steeper your seat tube angle needs to be. Just the opposite, as the ST gets steeper, and the position of the saddle in reference to the seatpost stays the same, the rider will get closer to the hbars, making them more upright BUT KOPS, a small and variable 'constant' will indirectly measure femur length and also determine 'best' seatube angle. After finding this and height of the saddle, then the top tube, stem lengths can be determined along with Hbar width..these depending on the rider's needs, desires, flexibility, etc. Both Keith Bontrager and Gary Klein disagree with the use of KOPS and present some pretty reasonable arguments: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/kops.html http://web.archive.org/web/19980201073043/www.kleinbikes.com/Technology/Myth/Knee_Over.html Bontrager seems to concentrate on climbing (seated and standing) positions, while Klein is more about just locating rider CG to BB distance (independent of KOPS) for comfortable seated riding. I tend to favor the Klein approach, locating my CG first with the saddle position (given that I can't change my seat tube angle), then setting bar height and reach with the stem choice to get the right cockpit length and bar height. It's been somewhat of a moving target though as over the years I've wanted to get my back flatter which closes up my hips too much (thighs hit ribs), so I've been forced to a more forward saddle position and longer reach stems. I find that spending a few hours total on the trainer spread out over a few days is the only way to get things really dialed in. How about having the stem and bars set so that in sprint position from drops and climb from tops the shoulder, hand and tire contact patch are all in line for smoothness. The saddle is set to allow one to pivot on a foot at bottom of the crank circle into standing moving your CG in an arc without effort and this coincidently leaves me balanced on the bike in normal seated pedalling with my butt back for motoring along or up on the rivet as well as doing a rough ground hover. That's the theory I'm working from on my new cross bike anyway and it's fitting like I've ridden it all my life. Now maybe I'm thinking Cross and that's why all the variations on standing and transitioning to and from and all the varied seated positions seem so important to me. Maybe someone who rides less busy would have different criteria. Still this is all stuff we all do on a bike. Anyhow, there's an awful lot of ways of looking at this problem. The amazing thing is that there's thousands of theories and most of them work. Of course there's riders of all shapes and sizes to make 'em work - any doubt look at the podium from the last Olympic road race. Ron |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
RonSonic wrote: ... That's the theory I'm working from on my new cross bike anyway and it's fitting like I've ridden it all my life. Now maybe I'm thinking Cross and that's why all the variations on standing and transitioning to and from and all the varied seated positions seem so important to me. Maybe someone who rides less busy would have different criteria. Still this is all stuff we all do on a bike.... Who is we, upright man? -- Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley Pedant |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
On 10 Jan 2006 20:26:34 -0800, "Johnny Sunset" wrote:
RonSonic wrote: ... That's the theory I'm working from on my new cross bike anyway and it's fitting like I've ridden it all my life. Now maybe I'm thinking Cross and that's why all the variations on standing and transitioning to and from and all the varied seated positions seem so important to me. Maybe someone who rides less busy would have different criteria. Still this is all stuff we all do on a bike.... Who is we, upright man? "We" is the people who can ride in the woods get off the pavement and go ride single-track. Ron |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
Peter Cole wrote: etc. Both Keith Bontrager and Gary Klein disagree with the use of KOPS and present some pretty reasonable arguments: Place to start only and a small 'c' constant. Yu have to start somewhere and KOPS, when used in that vein, is a great place to start and also in general, a way to prevent injury while making the best amount of power. CG is nice but almost impossible to find. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fit Questions
Per RonSonic:
The saddle is set to allow one to pivot on a foot at bottom of the crank circle into standing moving your CG in an arc without effort and this coincidently leaves me balanced on the bike in normal seated pedalling with my butt back for motoring along or up on the rivet as well as doing a rough ground hover. That's the theory I'm working from on my new cross bike anyway and it's fitting like I've ridden it all my life. Before getting a Seven Duo to fit my statistical outlier of a body, I went through three off-the-shelf frames and two customs which were set up any way I could to feel comfortable. Seven, of course, told me to go pound sand when I offered my supposedly helpful suggestions on what frame dimensions to use. Lucky for me... The thing about the Duo that hit me first and hardest was that I could go from sitting on the saddle to just touching the saddle to completely out of the saddle with no apparent change in the bike's balance - a totally smooth transition. Might sound trivial, but I think it's a big part of why this bike rides so much better than own abortive attempts to make a bike work for me. -- PeteCresswell |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultimate Wheel Questions | ChangingLINKS.com | Unicycling | 11 | April 19th 05 12:45 AM |
SOme interesting questions | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 1 | March 12th 05 05:59 PM |
One last set of questions | Steve L | UK | 22 | December 14th 04 11:49 PM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Tandem questions - re. the bike I just bought | Eric Rayl | Techniques | 8 | October 31st 03 10:09 PM |