|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A point or two about bike facilities
On May 25, 10:10*am, Opus wrote:
On May 24, 12:31*pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises" wrote: On May 24, 10:40*am, Opus wrote: You can't build a connected cycling system all at once. Early additions to the system won't be connected for the simple reason that there is nothing to connect to yet. I know this is frustrating, but think of it like they did during the early days of the Eisenhower Interstate system. Use what you have and dream about when it's all connected. Well, if you can't build it all at once, don't make bike lanes left and right, most with no connectivity to any future national lane. Make a Master Plan and proceed with it because what you are doing is DUMPING your money on "missing links" without ever having the budget for the real thing. But there's a great danger on top of it all: Wherever drivers see no lane, they assume you shouldn't be on the road, and that's an invitation for trouble like it happened to me. But that's another story. How simple would it be to give the lane to the cyclist since anyway a car and a bike can't possible fit on the same lane. In the meantime: WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE. One thing, we must first TAME TRAFFIC before we feel welcome on the road. If you can't build it all at once you shouldn't build it at all? Do you know what that sounds like?You know that the Interstate system started from cities and pushed together out in the countryside, much like the first transcontinental railroad joined east and west in Promintory UT which is still not even a wide spot in the road. The big difference was there were alternative highways already in existence, just like there are streets that exist even without bike lanes that can still be ridden by people on bicycles. As streets are rebuilt and repaved bike lanes will get installed because that's when the process is least expensive. This will appear to be "Willy Nilly", but is actually the best way to do it. On your taming traffic rant, laws like the 3 foot passing law will help, an educated police force will help, and people losing their cars or trucks for hitting a cyclist will definitely help. Opus, I know you are not playing SneakySnake, playing mind games or using delaying tactics with me. I'm assuming you are genuinely but naively believing in the progress of bike facilities in this country, or the rest of the Western World for that matter... If the missing links of bike lanes/ bike paths were part of some grandiose superhighway for bikes, there would be a Master Plan. Moreover they would go places where people need it the most, and I assure you that they don't take you anywhere in Miami. Key Biscayne has bike lanes, but that where the guys in lycra suits go to train in their fancy bikes. You were almost killed by a savage driver ON PURPOSE and you still believe in the general good will of the system. I would start by calling it 'THE JUNGLE' and proceed to taming it. It's easy and quick: BIKE TAKE THE LANE, CAR CLEARS THE LANE 30' BEFORE AND AFTER... No mixing of PREDATOR and PREY, comprende? |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What presidential issue you prefer, bike facilities or gay marriage? | donquijote1954 | Social Issues | 25 | January 29th 08 04:45 PM |
What presidential issue you prefer, bike facilities or gay marriage? | Zog The Undeniable | UK | 1 | January 24th 08 10:28 PM |
What presidential issue you prefer, bike facilities or gay marriage? | Jens Müller[_2_] | Rides | 1 | January 24th 08 10:23 PM |
What presidential issue you prefer, bike facilities or gay marriage? | Jens Müller[_2_] | UK | 1 | January 24th 08 10:23 PM |
What presidential issue you prefer, bike facilities or gaymarriage? | Jens Müller[_2_] | UK | 0 | January 24th 08 09:54 PM |