|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
powdercoat vs. poly-urethane bike paints
I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic
poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel road bike every two or three years. Love to get your opinions.... Casey Keller Valencia, CA |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I had my wife's bike Powder coated.I does take a licking for a Mt bike but
was a pain on installing some parts .The coating is thicker than paint I mean a lot thicker It work but a good paint job would have been easier to put some parts back on . I had a friend send his frame out to get it anodized and that was really nice . JMO good luck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I had my wife's bike Powder coated.I does take a licking for a Mt bike but
was a pain on installing some parts .The coating is thicker than paint I mean a lot thicker It work but a good paint job would have been easier to put some parts back on . I had a friend send his frame out to get it anodized and that was really nice . JMO good luck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:41:32 GMT, "Casey Keller"
wrote: I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? Durability varies both with the type of damage that is expected, and the specific paint-vs-powdercoat vendor pair under discussion. In many cases, paint can be touched up (for rock chips, etc) more successfully than powdercoat. My personal experience with powdercoats is in other fields where they were a continual disappointment to say the least. On the other hand, I've got a powdercoated frame coming in via UPS tomorrow, so I may have to change my opinion if it turns out to be better in this application. I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel road bike every two or three years. If it's due to dings, chips and scrapes, I'd personally stay with paint. Other riders may have other recommendations. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:41:32 GMT, "Casey Keller"
wrote: I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? Durability varies both with the type of damage that is expected, and the specific paint-vs-powdercoat vendor pair under discussion. In many cases, paint can be touched up (for rock chips, etc) more successfully than powdercoat. My personal experience with powdercoats is in other fields where they were a continual disappointment to say the least. On the other hand, I've got a powdercoated frame coming in via UPS tomorrow, so I may have to change my opinion if it turns out to be better in this application. I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel road bike every two or three years. If it's due to dings, chips and scrapes, I'd personally stay with paint. Other riders may have other recommendations. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel
road bike every two or three years. Sounds extreme. Keep your bike squeaky clean, wipe it down with Pledge or Pedro's Bike Lust after riding, etc. and that paint job should last many, many more years. My #1 bike, a Ti Merckx AX, has/needs no paint ;-). My '96 Bianchi is still practically in showroom condition, aside from the chipped paint in a few small locations. with ~15k miles on it. BTW, I'd rate the quality/durability of Bianchi factory paint below average compared to that of other bikes I've had. Last year I stripped, primed and spray-bombed my touring bike, also a Bianchi, and it's held up fine -- but that's just one year. My current fixie, a mid 1980's Univega that has never been babied or repainted, is still on its original paint and looks fine except for scratched downtube decals. This is anecdotal but may lead you to wonder why you only get a few years out of a paint job. Good luck. Mike Yankee (Address is munged to thwart spammers. To reply, delete everything after "com".) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel
road bike every two or three years. Sounds extreme. Keep your bike squeaky clean, wipe it down with Pledge or Pedro's Bike Lust after riding, etc. and that paint job should last many, many more years. My #1 bike, a Ti Merckx AX, has/needs no paint ;-). My '96 Bianchi is still practically in showroom condition, aside from the chipped paint in a few small locations. with ~15k miles on it. BTW, I'd rate the quality/durability of Bianchi factory paint below average compared to that of other bikes I've had. Last year I stripped, primed and spray-bombed my touring bike, also a Bianchi, and it's held up fine -- but that's just one year. My current fixie, a mid 1980's Univega that has never been babied or repainted, is still on its original paint and looks fine except for scratched downtube decals. This is anecdotal but may lead you to wonder why you only get a few years out of a paint job. Good luck. Mike Yankee (Address is munged to thwart spammers. To reply, delete everything after "com".) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Casey Keller" wrote : I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? Casey, Powdercoating will probably hold up longer for things like rust prevention and big chips. However, the overall powdercoating shiney finish is kind of sensitive. It can get scrached and look dull. Having said all of that, I have powdercoated all of the suspension/engine pieces on my V8 Volvo conversion. The powdercoating has held up over much driving, brake cleaner, extreme heat, etc. You can see what my parts look like he http://simondodd.home.comcast.net/volv8/ Good luck with your decision. -simon |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Casey Keller" wrote : I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? Casey, Powdercoating will probably hold up longer for things like rust prevention and big chips. However, the overall powdercoating shiney finish is kind of sensitive. It can get scrached and look dull. Having said all of that, I have powdercoated all of the suspension/engine pieces on my V8 Volvo conversion. The powdercoating has held up over much driving, brake cleaner, extreme heat, etc. You can see what my parts look like he http://simondodd.home.comcast.net/volv8/ Good luck with your decision. -simon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Casey Keller" wrote in message . com...
I understand powdercoat is a more durable bicycle finish than the classic poly-urethane paints. How much more durable? I ride about 3500 miles/year and seem to need a new paint job on my steel road bike every two or three years. Love to get your opinions.... Casey Keller Valencia, CA Like for like, powder coating is much much tougher than paint. Also much thicker. Done properly it should last forever (at a first approximation). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
if you wanted maximum braking, where would you sit? | wle | Techniques | 133 | November 18th 15 02:10 AM |
Bike Stores Endangerd Because of Super Chain Stores? | James Lynx | General | 112 | June 5th 04 01:22 PM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | General | 0 | June 1st 04 04:52 AM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | Recumbent Biking | 0 | June 1st 04 04:49 AM |
my new bike | Marian Rosenberg | General | 5 | October 19th 03 03:00 PM |