|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trek Fuel 80.......again
The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible.
It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible. It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks Throw it in the dumpster. -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot (Beat JD to the punch) o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP says:
What is the best way to lighten the bike? Probably easier and cheaper to remove the 2 lbs from the rider. Just keep riding hard. ;-) Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible. It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks buy a lighter bike. The money you'll have spent changing out components ( seat post, cranks, wheels, etc) could be put to spending more on a bike that weighs less. The general thinking for your price range is, nice light hardtail with nice components, or low end FS that is heavy and middle of the road at best components. penny s |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible. It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks Try the Fuel 90, or 95; same frame lighter components. -- - Zilla Cary, NC (Remove XSPAM) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"TonyP" wrote in message ... The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible. It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks ghost ride it |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dean A. Stepper" wrote in message news:PdbGd.859$ry.20@fed1read05... "TonyP" wrote in message ... The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible. It rides very well. What is the best way to lighten the bike? Many Thanks ghost ride it Ghost riding is fantastic. We've had ghost riding races down the rocky section of Rockit. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is it the components that are low end or the components and the frame.
I've been told I can get the bike to 26lbs. If you think the frame is crap, can someone point out the flaws in it. Cheers. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
Is it the components that are low end or the components and the frame. I've been told I can get the bike to 26lbs. If you think the frame is crap, can someone point out the flaws in it. Sorry Tony, but the flaw is in thinking two lbs. makes a difference. (Don't take that hard-it's about the most common "flaw" when it comes to thinking about new bikes). If all the weight came off the circumference of the wheels, you'd notice a difference in handling and maybe go a little faster, but otherwise you're just being a weight weenie. Higher quality components work better, and are lighter because of better alloys, engineering, and manufacturing methods (usually forged vs. cast). The reason *most* of us ride better stuff is that it works better and lasts longer. It's a little lighter, but that's not the biggest motivation. Do a gut-check. Got a gut? Loose weight there first. :-) Shawn |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for that Shawn and now I realise that the weight of the bike isn't
everything. Just one more question. Are the new 2005 frames weak or badly designed? If the frame is no good then I won't bother to put an expensive fork or better crankset on the bike. Thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trek Fuel 80 2005 opinions | TonyP | Mountain Biking | 24 | January 13th 05 11:17 PM |
trek liquid vs. fuel - NEWBIE | Garrett | Mountain Biking | 77 | October 4th 04 07:50 AM |
TREK FUEL 100 PROJECT 1 NEW 17.5 MED.. (ezClassifieds) | CHRIS | Marketplace | 0 | July 3rd 04 12:09 AM |
Stumpjumper FSR Disc or TREK Fuel 90 disc???? | peterjd66 | Mountain Biking | 0 | November 19th 03 11:42 PM |
Trek Fuel 80 vs. Giant NRS 2 | William Smith | Mountain Biking | 6 | October 29th 03 03:23 AM |