|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
Chinese cyclist with nerves of steel, but not completely nonchalant, I'd say:- http://tinyurl.com/y8fajxh Good show, anyway. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Squashme wrote: Chinese cyclist with nerves of steel, but not completely nonchalant, I'd say:- http://tinyurl.com/y8fajxh Good show, anyway. Someone posted that video already, either here or in the new group. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
On 8 Jan, 19:13, Rob Morley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:54:23 -0800 (PST) Squashme wrote: Chinese cyclist with nerves of steel, but not completely nonchalant, I'd say:- http://tinyurl.com/y8fajxh Good show, anyway. Someone posted that video already, either here or in the new group. You're right. My apologies to Tom Crispin, and indeed to Doug. Obviously I am not checking urc closely enough these days. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:23:30
uk.rec.cycling Squashme On 8 Jan, 19:13, Rob Morley wrote: On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:54:23 -0800 (PST) Squashme wrote: Chinese cyclist with nerves of steel, but not completely nonchalant, I'd say:- http://tinyurl.com/y8fajxh Good show, anyway. Someone posted that video already, either here or in the new group. You're right. My apologies to Tom Crispin, and indeed to Doug. Obviously I am not checking urc closely enough these days. The alternative theory is that we don't all read the daily mail. -- Wm... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
On 11 Jan, 05:42, "Wm..." wrote:
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:23:30 uk.rec.cycling Squashme On 8 Jan, 19:13, Rob Morley wrote: On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:54:23 -0800 (PST) Squashme wrote: Chinese cyclist with nerves of steel, but not completely nonchalant, I'd say:- http://tinyurl.com/y8fajxh Good show, anyway. Someone posted that video already, either here or in the new group. You're right. My apologies to Tom Crispin, and indeed to Doug. Obviously I am not checking urc closely enough these days. The alternative theory is that we don't all read the daily mail. -- Oh come on, how else would we know what the broad ranks of the righteous are thinking? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, is nobody checking the Daily Mail these days?!
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:31:38
uk.rec.cycling Squashme You're right. My apologies to Tom Crispin, and indeed to Doug. Obviously I am not checking urc closely enough these days. The alternative theory is that we don't all read the daily mail. Oh come on, how else would we know what the broad ranks of the righteous are thinking? We might choose the righteous brothers as a musical choice. I'm smiling, Squash, because I think you understand irony. -- Wm... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Daily Mail again | Chris Gerhard | UK | 132 | September 22nd 09 10:08 PM |
Recycling, cycling, Daily Mail, despair | Squashme | UK | 36 | September 17th 09 11:00 AM |
Daily Mail | Jim | UK | 47 | July 10th 08 08:42 PM |
Does the Daily Mail hates Cyclists? | Steve C[_2_] | UK | 210 | July 5th 08 02:53 PM |
Ridiculous article in Daily Mail | Brian Wakem | UK | 22 | November 17th 04 10:18 AM |