|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Naked road scheme in London
From:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm "Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria and Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph and drivers will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians who will be able to cross anywhere on the road." It is interesting that drivers on Exhibition Road do currently have automatic right of way of pedestrians. No mention in the article of the potential effects for cyclists. Full story below: """ Road users mingle in naked scheme A west London road may be stripped of its kerb, traffic lights and signs in an attempt to encourage pedestrians and cars to mingle. Exhibition Road in Kensington has been chosen for the "naked road" experiment - a scheme pioneered in Holland. Organisers say the idea works as a form of psychological traffic calming which encourages drivers to be more considerate to pedestrians. But an RAC spokesman said it may encourage drivers to be more reckless. RAC Foundation executive director Edmund King said: "This is a form of psychological traffic calming which encourages drivers to slow down and think a lot more about pedestrians and other road users. "We shall be following this trial very closely. "In Holland, there have been places where a number of roads meet and no one has the automatic right of way. Although this might make drivers more careful, it could also encourage the aggressive motorist to behave more recklessly. "We would certainly question whether this type of experiment should be implemented on a wider scale." Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria and Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph and drivers will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians who will be able to cross anywhere on the road. Kensington and Chelsea Council, the lead authority on the project, plan to introduce similar principles to Sloane Square by removing the roundabout and creating two large pedestrian areas. A similar naked road scheme is already in place in Wiltshire. """ Colin |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Colin Blackburn wrote:
From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm snip If the exponential increase in crap driving upon crossing the M25 threshold is anything to go buy, I expect many collisions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Colin Blackburn wrote:
A west London road may be stripped of its kerb, traffic lights and signs in an attempt to encourage pedestrians and cars to mingle. Exhibition Road in Kensington has been chosen for the "naked road" experiment - a scheme pioneered in Holland. If Kensington council wants to spend money on roads it could start by fixing the drains in the High Street. It was like a river last time I was there. As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will cause accidents. -- Eiron. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Colin Blackburn wrote:
From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm "Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria and Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph I don't know the road, so I'll trust a 20mph limit is fine and appropriate for the road - but I thought the whole point of the naked roads business was that drivers had to work everything out for themselves, and thus drive more carefully? (as opposed to being nannied with excessie warning and restrictions to an extent that they don't think and thus miss the hazards they weren't warned of). Surely (stricter) traffic regulations go against this, in so much as there is still an element of nannying? and drivers will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians who will be able to cross anywhere on the road." *Sigh* This is already the case - Also I hope that there is still an expectation that pedestrians should look before crossing instead of just bumbling into the road (and of course that there remains one that drivers et al be prepared for the possibility that pedestrians may cross without looking just in case). There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth that there is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as IMV more should be done to promote the reality that everyone has equal right to use the road and that people should be considerate of that. It is interesting that drivers on Exhibition Road do currently have automatic right of way of pedestrians. No mention in the article of the potential effects for cyclists. I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but it wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the road simply hadn't been considered. article snip I do support anything that encourages road users to think more when using the road - but this sounds a bit like a LA trying to be trendy and wasting vast sums of money in doing so. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nathaniel David Porter wrote:
There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth that there is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as IMV more should be done to promote the reality that everyone has equal right to use the road and that people should be considerate of that. There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads. I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but it wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the road simply hadn't been considered. Cyclists should not require any special consideration or provision in this kind of scheme. -- Dave... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Eiron wrote:
As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will cause accidents. I believe that has not generally been the case where similar schemes have been tried elsewhere. -- Dave... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"dkahn400" wrote in message oups.com... Nathaniel David Porter wrote: There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth that there is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as IMV more should be done to promote the reality that everyone has equal right to use the road and that people should be considerate of that. There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads. How precisely does that work? I find that the mentality some road users have that they and/or their (current) road user group is somehow superior or righteous than some or all of the rest tends to lead to reckless behaviour on their part - we've all seen the idiot who while driving whinging about pedestrians bumbling into the road only to get out of his car and bumble into the road, effing and blinding about the car who has had to stop for him. I would suggest that this mentality is one of the biggest obstacles to improved road safety in this country today. Essentially the Clarkson-esque "get off my road" mentality that some motorists have is the same as the "holier than thou" (a la Doug) attitude some cyclists have, and similar mentailities than some other road users have - it's little more than "me first". I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but it wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the road simply hadn't been considered. Cyclists should not require any special consideration or provision in this kind of scheme. The needs of cyclists have to be considered when designing any scheme on a road which cyclists are permitted to use. It may well be these needs do not require any special provision, or any alteration to the scheme, however the consideration still needs to be there - and if this scheme follows form then cyclists needs will not have been considered enough (if at all). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal
right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads. How precisely does that work? Driving licences, "road tax", MOT, insurance? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Eiron wrote:
As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will cause accidents. That's not the experience of places where they have been introduced - quite the opposite in fact which is why this is such an interesting trial. Tony |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nathaniel Porter wrote:
"dkahn400" wrote in message There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads. How precisely does that work? Because driving isnt a right? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
off road or on road tyre | Skunk | UK | 14 | July 21st 04 07:55 PM |
Spring ride in the Sierra | [email protected] | Rides | 1 | June 2nd 04 08:01 PM |
Spring ride in the Sierra | [email protected] | Rides | 0 | May 27th 04 02:59 PM |
Fame at last! [warning: contains 5m*th] | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 308 | March 29th 04 12:00 AM |
Braking while turning | [email protected] | Techniques | 45 | August 1st 03 06:56 PM |