|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? F |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
In article ,
Fred Flintstein wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote: However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? Cavorting with B list celebrities. He should raise his sights and go on dancing with the stars. -- Old Fritz |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
Anton Berlin wrote:
However, Lance is getting caught. Fred Flintstein wrote: Doing what? Frederick the Great wrote: Cavorting with B list celebrities. He should raise his sights and go on dancing with the stars. With Liz. OTOH Berliner would probably consider that punishment enough. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On May 20, 10:06*pm, Fred Flintstein
wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote: However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? F You're being a troll. But I'll answer to shut you up. True there are few criminal penalties for doping for any sport. But at the same time there are a lot of supporting crimes that accompany the act of doping. Fraud is when you misrepresent yourself or violate the terms of a contract or agreement. Lance and others committed fraud with their 'doping for a bike race'. Racketeering is when you commit a series of criminal acts (many acts of fraud in Lance's example) as well as money laundering, bribery, interstate transportation, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud. These that are right up Lance's alley - felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in narcotic or other dangerous drugs; and any act that is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act. (which there are more than likely a host of traceable violations and charges) The testosterone handed out like candy that Hincappie and others have testified to - chemicals and drugs that fall under the Controlled Substances Act. Anabolic steroids, for example, are classified as Schedule III controlled substances. (don't forget the andro found in his apartment in Spain) No doubt testified to already. There is also misuse of public funds, perjury related to the SCA depositions, the money he received subject to criminal fraud, bank fraud and other civil remedies. Bribery with the UCI. Doubt those fat swiss pigs will take a fall for Lance. Lance is in some hot water not for 'doping for a bike race' but for all of the acts he did to make doping in a bike race possible. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/21/2011 9:12 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
On May 20, 10:06 pm, Fred Flintstein wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote: However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? F You're being a troll. But I'll answer to shut you up. True there are few criminal penalties for doping for any sport. But at the same time there are a lot of supporting crimes that accompany the act of doping. Fraud is when you misrepresent yourself or violate the terms of a contract or agreement. Lance and others committed fraud with their 'doping for a bike race'. Racketeering is when you commit a series of criminal acts (many acts of fraud in Lance's example) as well as money laundering, bribery, interstate transportation, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud. These that are right up Lance's alley - felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in narcotic or other dangerous drugs; and any act that is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act. (which there are more than likely a host of traceable violations and charges) The testosterone handed out like candy that Hincappie and others have testified to - chemicals and drugs that fall under the Controlled Substances Act. Anabolic steroids, for example, are classified as Schedule III controlled substances. (don't forget the andro found in his apartment in Spain) No doubt testified to already. There is also misuse of public funds, perjury related to the SCA depositions, the money he received subject to criminal fraud, bank fraud and other civil remedies. Bribery with the UCI. Doubt those fat swiss pigs will take a fall for Lance. Lance is in some hot water not for 'doping for a bike race' but for all of the acts he did to make doping in a bike race possible. Dumbass, If you google 'legal definition of fraud', what do you find? You're missing a key point of the definition. But you know that. You're also unclear about the definition of perjury. Or maybe you do get it and you're intentionally misrepresenting it. But I'm pretty sure it has to be relevant to an illegal act and I'm also pretty sure that taking the 5th doesn't count as perjury. SCA, Jesus ****ing Christ! Dope wasn't relevant to the contract. Thus lying about dope isn't perjury. But you know that. If you google 'legal definition of fraud' you'll find the, um, legal definition of fraud. Check it out. F PS And if they get him for possession I certainly hope someone in the FDA hierarchy has an uncomfortable discussion with Novitsky about the proper use of scarce law enforcement resources. Especially since they aren't ****ing likely to get him for possession a decade after the fact. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/21/2011 2:27 AM, Frederick the Great wrote:
In articleV6mdnavhh9LasUrQnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@giganews. com, Fred wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote: However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? Cavorting with B list celebrities. He should raise his sights and go on dancing with the stars. Just like the Amstel, he wouldn't be able to beat Boogerd. F |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On May 21, 9:31*am, Fred Flintstein
wrote: On 5/21/2011 9:12 AM, Anton Berlin wrote: On May 20, 10:06 pm, Fred Flintstein *wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote: However, Lance is getting caught. Dumbass, Doing what? F You're being a troll. *But I'll answer to shut you up. *True there are few criminal penalties for doping for any sport. *But at the same time there are a lot of supporting crimes that accompany the act of doping. Fraud is when you misrepresent yourself or violate the terms of a contract or agreement. * Lance and others committed fraud with their 'doping for a bike race'. Racketeering is when you commit a series of criminal acts (many acts of fraud in Lance's example) as well as money laundering, bribery, interstate transportation, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud. These that are right up Lance's alley - felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in narcotic or other dangerous drugs; and any act that is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act. (which there are more than likely a host of traceable violations and charges) The testosterone handed out like candy that Hincappie and others have testified to - chemicals and drugs that fall under the Controlled Substances Act. Anabolic steroids, for example, are classified as Schedule III controlled substances. *(don't forget the andro found in his apartment in Spain) No doubt testified to already. There is also misuse of public funds, perjury related to the SCA depositions, the money he received subject to criminal fraud, bank fraud and other civil remedies. *Bribery with the UCI. *Doubt those fat swiss pigs will take a fall for Lance. Lance is in some hot water not for 'doping for a bike race' but for all of the acts he did to make doping in a bike race possible. Dumbass, If you google 'legal definition of fraud', what do you find? You're missing a key point of the definition. But you know that. You're also unclear about the definition of perjury. Or maybe you do get it and you're intentionally misrepresenting it. But I'm pretty sure it has to be relevant to an illegal act and I'm also pretty sure that taking the 5th doesn't count as perjury. SCA, Jesus ****ing Christ! Dope wasn't relevant to the contract. Thus lying about dope isn't perjury. But you know that. If you google 'legal definition of fraud' you'll find the, um, legal definition of fraud. Check it out. F PS And if they get him for possession I certainly hope someone in the FDA hierarchy has an uncomfortable discussion with Novitsky about the proper use of scarce law enforcement resources. Especially since they aren't ****ing likely to get him for possession a decade after the fact. Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. Your boy is nailed - breathe deep and exhale that testicle you've been keeping throat warm for the last decade. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/21/2011 9:34 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. Ummm, the guy that rendered the judgment disagreed. Whose opinion counted more? Dumbass? F PS If you repeat the same arguments over and over, surely at some point they will be correct, eh? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On May 21, 10:19*am, Fred Flintstein
wrote: On 5/21/2011 9:34 AM, Anton Berlin wrote: Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. *I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. Ummm, the guy that rendered the judgment disagreed. Whose opinion counted more? Dumbass? F PS If you repeat the same arguments over and over, surely at some point they will be correct, eh? Don't you feel uncomfortable being a grown man and being obsessively in love with another man ? Why does Lance's innocence influence your masturbation fantasies so thoroughly? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
SCA, Jesus ****ing Christ! Dope wasn't relevant to the
contract. Thus lying about dope isn't perjury. But you know that. If you google 'legal definition of fraud' you'll find the, um, legal definition of fraud. Check it out. F PS And if they get him for possession I certainly hope someone in the FDA hierarchy has an uncomfortable discussion with Novitsky about the proper use of scarce law enforcement resources. Especially since they aren't ****ing likely to get him for possession a decade after the fact. ======= Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. ======= Could you elaborate on that? It didn't seem to have anything to do with the final decision in the case. Do you think it was just posturing, an attempt to rattle people? Maybe something like Greg LeMond did when he threatened Trek with public disclosure of everything-Lance and various internal discussions, something that Trek negated by disclosing everything first (the "nuclear" option). Maybe SCA figured that Lance would drop the lawsuit under the threat of negative publicity? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Almost missed 'cuz it's not a Tuesday! | Mike Jacoubowsky | Racing | 7 | May 20th 11 11:22 PM |
island lake on tuesday | rab2009 | Unicycling | 4 | August 28th 07 05:55 AM |
Super Tuesday Counts | flyingdutch | Australia | 7 | February 12th 07 05:06 AM |
Brisbane Ride Tuesday 27/9 | LotteBum | Australia | 17 | September 27th 05 09:34 AM |
Tuesday will be Horner's Day | Ken Prager | Racing | 8 | July 20th 05 08:47 PM |