|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best BB for Campy Racing T
Questions for all you campagnolo experts:
I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Were the older, mid-90's Record 111mm bottom brackets symmetrical, and if so, would they work with the Racing-T? I have access to an NOS Record bb of this era. I've heard nothing but great things about Phil Wood bottom brackets. Would I need the 110.5mm 'campagnolo specific' bb or the 111mm? How do these compare to the ACH or the older campy Record? On another, somewhat related subject: is there any significant difference between my 9 speed racing-T cranks and the current campy 10 speed triples? I'm running 10 speed, and my front shifting is decent, though sometimes hesitant going down into the small ring or up to the largest ring while pedaling. Is the spacing on 10-speed-specific cranks different, and would changing cranks make for better shifts? Perhaps I just need to fine-tune my L-H screws on the front derailleur. TIA Michael |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will
not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Not necessarily true. I have a Diamondback titanium frame with a Racing-T and a Chorus 2003 model 111mm BB and it shifts much better than the Ultegra triple setup that I had on this frame previously. I believe that the Chorus is the same specs as the Record. Jim Toth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will
not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Not necessarily true. I have a Diamondback titanium frame with a Racing-T and a Chorus 2003 model 111mm BB and it shifts much better than the Ultegra triple setup that I had on this frame previously. I believe that the Chorus is the same specs as the Record. Jim Toth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I just put a Phil Wood BB on as I was tired of the cheap Campy bbs wearing
out about once every year or so. I ride enough that they are disposable. I'd ck with a LBS as my Phil was cheaper through my LBS than on the web. Alan "Michael L." wrote in message ... Questions for all you campagnolo experts: I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Were the older, mid-90's Record 111mm bottom brackets symmetrical, and if so, would they work with the Racing-T? I have access to an NOS Record bb of this era. I've heard nothing but great things about Phil Wood bottom brackets. Would I need the 110.5mm 'campagnolo specific' bb or the 111mm? How do these compare to the ACH or the older campy Record? On another, somewhat related subject: is there any significant difference between my 9 speed racing-T cranks and the current campy 10 speed triples? I'm running 10 speed, and my front shifting is decent, though sometimes hesitant going down into the small ring or up to the largest ring while pedaling. Is the spacing on 10-speed-specific cranks different, and would changing cranks make for better shifts? Perhaps I just need to fine-tune my L-H screws on the front derailleur. TIA Michael |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I just put a Phil Wood BB on as I was tired of the cheap Campy bbs wearing
out about once every year or so. I ride enough that they are disposable. I'd ck with a LBS as my Phil was cheaper through my LBS than on the web. Alan "Michael L." wrote in message ... Questions for all you campagnolo experts: I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Were the older, mid-90's Record 111mm bottom brackets symmetrical, and if so, would they work with the Racing-T? I have access to an NOS Record bb of this era. I've heard nothing but great things about Phil Wood bottom brackets. Would I need the 110.5mm 'campagnolo specific' bb or the 111mm? How do these compare to the ACH or the older campy Record? On another, somewhat related subject: is there any significant difference between my 9 speed racing-T cranks and the current campy 10 speed triples? I'm running 10 speed, and my front shifting is decent, though sometimes hesitant going down into the small ring or up to the largest ring while pedaling. Is the spacing on 10-speed-specific cranks different, and would changing cranks make for better shifts? Perhaps I just need to fine-tune my L-H screws on the front derailleur. TIA Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I just put a Phil Wood BB on as I was tired of the cheap Campy bbs wearing
out about once every year or so. I ride enough that they are disposable. I'd ck with a LBS as my Phil was cheaper through my LBS than on the web. Alan "Michael L." wrote in message ... Questions for all you campagnolo experts: I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? Were the older, mid-90's Record 111mm bottom brackets symmetrical, and if so, would they work with the Racing-T? I have access to an NOS Record bb of this era. I've heard nothing but great things about Phil Wood bottom brackets. Would I need the 110.5mm 'campagnolo specific' bb or the 111mm? How do these compare to the ACH or the older campy Record? On another, somewhat related subject: is there any significant difference between my 9 speed racing-T cranks and the current campy 10 speed triples? I'm running 10 speed, and my front shifting is decent, though sometimes hesitant going down into the small ring or up to the largest ring while pedaling. Is the spacing on 10-speed-specific cranks different, and would changing cranks make for better shifts? Perhaps I just need to fine-tune my L-H screws on the front derailleur. TIA Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
michael- I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T
crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). BRBR Cannot use the Chorus or Record triple BB. Wait until 2005 stuff is out and get the new Centaur 111mm BB. A Chorus unit with a 111mm BB spindle in it. Or like you mentioned, a 111mm BB from the 80s/90s. Or a Phil Wood BB. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
michael- I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T
crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). BRBR Cannot use the Chorus or Record triple BB. Wait until 2005 stuff is out and get the new Centaur 111mm BB. A Chorus unit with a 111mm BB spindle in it. Or like you mentioned, a 111mm BB from the 80s/90s. Or a Phil Wood BB. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Michael L. wrote:
I have a 9 speed (circa 2001-2002, not sure) campagnolo racing-T crankset mounted on a Campy ACH 111mm bottom bracket. I'm looking for a lighter-weight alternative to this bottom bracket (yes, I know the weight differences aren't huge, but the ACH has a lot of wear on it, and I'm ready to upgrade). AC-H (AKA Centaur) BB is the best current Campagnolo BB that is properly compatible with Racing T cranks (which requires a symetrical BB). Other makes (including FSA) have lighter models but you'd have to risk using a titanium spindle with the lightest ones. Am I correct that the CURRENT Campy Record Triple bottom bracket will not work with the Racing-T, as it is an asymmetrical 111mm? The Racing T group is discontinued, but I believe the Racing T BB was the same thing as the current Centaur BB (which is symetrical) or at least had the same dimensions. Were the older, mid-90's Record 111mm bottom brackets symmetrical, and if so, would they work with the Racing-T? I have access to an NOS Record bb of this era. I've heard nothing but great things about Phil Wood bottom brackets. Would I need the 110.5mm 'campagnolo specific' bb or the 111mm? How do these compare to the ACH or the older campy Record? 111 would be required. Sorry I don't know about older Records or Phil Woods. On another, somewhat related subject: is there any significant difference between my 9 speed racing-T cranks and the current campy 10 speed triples? I'm running 10 speed, and my front shifting is decent, though sometimes hesitant going down into the small ring or up to the largest ring while pedaling. Is the spacing on 10-speed-specific cranks different, and would changing cranks make for better shifts? Perhaps I just need to fine-tune my L-H screws on the front derailleur. I believe the actual crank arms of Racing T and Centaur triples are virtually the same things, but there is some difference with the 9 and 10sp rings and spacing. ~PB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA - TEAM RALEIGH DL185 PROFESSIONAL RACING BIKE CAMPAGNOLO SUPER RECORD | MarkSG | Racing | 0 | November 28th 04 02:57 PM |
FA - TEAM RALEIGH DL185 PROFESSIONAL RACING BIKE CAMPAGNOLO SUPER RECORD | MarkSG | Racing | 0 | November 28th 04 02:57 PM |
AOL is protecting Lance | tom tank | Racing | 4 | July 20th 04 10:39 PM |
Ghent Six Day Excursion | Ilan Vardi | Racing | 8 | November 30th 03 08:03 PM |