|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Usenet is worthless!
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article , !Jones wrote: I'm sure there are other changes, but 977 was and still is the seminal, primary source document. I've read a couple of your posts and they're largely horse****. I imagine 977 has some historical interest for somebody or other but if someone wanted to sit down and code up a new implementation they certainly would not be starting with a superceded document. I always used to post that when I wanted to make myself a PITA. That usually resulted in my account being terminated with extreme prejudice; I doubt that very much. What the **** this has to do with bicycles I am yet to fathom....... -- |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Usenet is worthless! | JimmyMac | General | 4 | June 20th 08 04:03 AM |
Why Usenet is worthless! | JimmyMac | Mountain Biking | 4 | June 20th 08 04:03 AM |
Why Usenet is worthless! | humbug | General | 0 | June 18th 08 02:27 PM |
Just how worthless is ARBR? | JimmyMac | Recumbent Biking | 1 | February 24th 08 01:57 AM |
Q. How worthless are 29ers and SSs? | â–€Slack | Mountain Biking | 6 | October 3rd 07 06:36 PM |