Alex Dowsett responds after Griff Rhys Jones ‘depicts cyclists as yobs’ in newspaper column

On 07/07/2020 02:34, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 01:34:55 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 06/07/2020 18:47, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 6 July 2020 18:38:34 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 06/07/2020 17:50, Simon Mason wrote:

QUOTE:
Alex Dowsett has shared his thoughts after Griff Rhys Jones complained about “lycra-clad hooligans� in a newspaper column.

Rhys Jones, the Welsh comedian and writer, penned a piece for the Mail Online headlined ‘Off Your bike! Griff Rhys Jones is forced to take drastic action after lycra-clad hooligans started rattling down the public footpath running through his garden’.

In the article, the 66-year-old complains about cyclists riding along a public footpath that passes through his garden, claiming he was passed by one ride “at approximately 40mph� off-road. (40 MPH, INDEED) - SM

Rhys Jones goes on to explain how he tried putting logs across the path to stop riders using the path, which legally is only for walkers.

But the tone of the article caught the attention of Israel Start-Up Nation rider Dowsett.

The British time trial champion wrote to Rhys Jones on Twitter, saying: “I wasn’t much of a fan of your article in the Mail. Whilst the facts of cyclists being on the footpath I believe to be wholeheartedly true, your descriptions of cyclists are exaggerated; depicting cyclists as ‘yobs’.

“That won’t help is driving a harder wedge in between the divide that the media seem intent on creating. We share this planet, these roads and we all make mistakes. We all enjoy being part of groups/societies/clubs yet we don’t necessarily agree with what everyone in them do.�

Dowsett said Rhys Jones’s claim that a cyclist had passed him at 40mph was “absurd�. (MORE LIKE A LIE) - SM

In the article, Rhys Jones explains how an ancient footpath that crosses through his land in Suffolk and is regularly used by walkers.

Rhys Jones said cyclists have been travelling through his land because the nearby reservoir, a popular cycling spot, is closed due to the coronavirus lockdown.

He goes on to say “I worry that my naivety has been exploited by some rather irritating keep-fit cyclists who insist on rattling past even though, according to the Countryside Act of 1968, bicycles should be ridden only on bridleways, not footpaths like mine.�

After installing logs across the path, Rhys Jones contacted Suffolk County Council to ask if he could install a gate to prevent cyclists using the path, but was told that he didn’t have the right.

He closes the piece by admitting that most of the cyclists have since returned to the reservoir, which has now re-opened as restrictions have been eased.

Dowsett said: “The article could’ve been very different, instead of ‘us angels & them villains; how about ‘making it safe for everyone to enjoy East Anglia through signs, respect and education’ but then I guess the Mail would’ve ignored your work.�

https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/l...-column-459253

Who is "Dowsett" and what does blatant cyclist misbehaviour on private
land got to do with him? Do cyclists melt when they hear reasonable and
measured criticism of themselves?

If it is a footpath rather than a bridleway or BOAT then cyclists should walk their bikes.

The landowner says it is a footpath.

What does the Definitive Map say?

The landowner, who is something of a public figure, says it is a
footpath. If it were not, you can be reasonably sure that someone would
have authoritatively pointed that ouit by now.

Has that been done?

Can *you* do it?

They will still have bikes and be dressed the same so I can't see the objection so long as they ride with care.
Look up the Kinder Scout trespass, without it that footpath would not exist.

You can't see the objection of a landowner to abuse of his property?

Who is surprised at that?

So you think all public footpaths should be closed?

Only to vehicles of all sorts (with the possible exception of
wheelbarrows and agricultural maintenance vehicles in the tractor class).

There's a clue in the word "footpath" for those with enough intelligence
to spot it.

You *didn't* spot it, did you?