A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but drivers brazenlyflout ban



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 23rd 17, 03:30 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 781
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:14 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 23.05.2017 06:45, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.


It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


I'll take your blatherings any way I like.
Thank God I am childish in YOUR eyes.


And 99% of the population.

--
Said the Duchess of Windsor at tea,
"Young man, do you fart when you pee?"
I replied with some wit
"Do you belch when you ****?"
I think that was one up to me.
Ads
  #12  
Old May 23rd 17, 07:19 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 376
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:45:25 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:37:23 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 6:47:13 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:59 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:40:13 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:13:16 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
Drivers have been brazenly flouting a traffic ban at Bank junction which
was brought in to improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians.

The new rules, brought in after the death of a cyclist at the
notoriously busy interchange, were enforced from 7am today. All vehicles
apart from cyclists and buses are banned from using it before 7pm.

But footage taken during the busy morning commute shows drivers
blatantly disregarding the new regulations and driving through.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-a3545041.html

This story and the video are obviously fake.
Only cyclists break the law.

Since there are more drivers than cyclists using that junction, why ban the majority?

Can you provide proof of this?

Just go and stand on any pavement and watch.


We are talking about one particular junction which cars cannot legally use.
Since only cyclists break the law this means there are no cars using that junction.


Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.


How many used it before the restriction?


Does democracy mean anything to you?

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

If you think that a minority can be correct while the majority is wrong then you're an idiot. Why should that minority be able to say they are the correct ones?


Is it OK if the majority vote to exterminate all left handed redheads?


Of course.


And how about those with particular religious beliefs?


Ban the cyclists, same outcome, no squished cyclists, but more people can continue to use the junction.

Most car crashes are caused by men, lets make 'Driving whilst male' an offence.

Actually they're not. Women cause more crashes, men cause bigger crashes.


Evidence?


DYOFR.


So no evidence to support your claim.


Anyway my point is, cyclists are a minority, it wouldn't affect society much to ban them from a junction. Banning a large number of car drivers does though.


No car drivers use the junction in question because they never break the law.


Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.


How many used it before the restriction?


Speed and red light cameras are a waste of money because they never catch any number plated vehicles.

I've got them all listed on my satnav so I can flout the stupid law.

Typical spongeing freeloader doelscum motorist.

Try to make less than 2 spelling errors per sentence. Typical illiterate psycholist wannabe tour de france rider in kinky underwear and a learner's helmet.

And what does sponging have to do with breaking petty traffic laws?

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.


True story.


It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


So it was appropriate.

  #13  
Old May 23rd 17, 08:00 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 781
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Tue, 23 May 2017 19:19:41 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:45:25 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:37:23 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 6:47:13 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:59 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:40:13 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:13:16 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
Drivers have been brazenly flouting a traffic ban at Bank junction which
was brought in to improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians.

The new rules, brought in after the death of a cyclist at the
notoriously busy interchange, were enforced from 7am today. All vehicles
apart from cyclists and buses are banned from using it before 7pm.

But footage taken during the busy morning commute shows drivers
blatantly disregarding the new regulations and driving through.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-a3545041.html

This story and the video are obviously fake.
Only cyclists break the law.

Since there are more drivers than cyclists using that junction, why ban the majority?

Can you provide proof of this?

Just go and stand on any pavement and watch.

We are talking about one particular junction which cars cannot legally use.
Since only cyclists break the law this means there are no cars using that junction.


Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.


How many used it before the restriction?


Same as any other junction, 95% cars, 5% cyclists.

Does democracy mean anything to you?

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

If you think that a minority can be correct while the majority is wrong then you're an idiot. Why should that minority be able to say they are the correct ones?

Is it OK if the majority vote to exterminate all left handed redheads?


Of course.


And how about those with particular religious beliefs?


Definitely of course. Religion is a sign of gross stupidity. We even let the ****wit Muslims into our country who keep killing people.

Ban the cyclists, same outcome, no squished cyclists, but more people can continue to use the junction.

Most car crashes are caused by men, lets make 'Driving whilst male' an offence.

Actually they're not. Women cause more crashes, men cause bigger crashes.

Evidence?


DYOFR.


So no evidence to support your claim.


GIYF.

Speed and red light cameras are a waste of money because they never catch any number plated vehicles.

I've got them all listed on my satnav so I can flout the stupid law.

Typical spongeing freeloader doelscum motorist.

Try to make less than 2 spelling errors per sentence. Typical illiterate psycholist wannabe tour de france rider in kinky underwear and a learner's helmet.

And what does sponging have to do with breaking petty traffic laws?

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.


It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


So it was appropriate.


It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.

--
Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
  #14  
Old May 23rd 17, 09:03 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 376
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:00:37 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 19:19:41 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:45:25 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:37:23 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 6:47:13 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:59 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:40:13 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:13:16 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
Drivers have been brazenly flouting a traffic ban at Bank junction which
was brought in to improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians.

The new rules, brought in after the death of a cyclist at the
notoriously busy interchange, were enforced from 7am today. All vehicles
apart from cyclists and buses are banned from using it before 7pm.

But footage taken during the busy morning commute shows drivers
blatantly disregarding the new regulations and driving through.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-a3545041.html

This story and the video are obviously fake.
Only cyclists break the law.

Since there are more drivers than cyclists using that junction, why ban the majority?

Can you provide proof of this?

Just go and stand on any pavement and watch.

We are talking about one particular junction which cars cannot legally use.
Since only cyclists break the law this means there are no cars using that junction.

Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.


How many used it before the restriction?


Same as any other junction, 95% cars, 5% cyclists.


Every junction?
What happens when cyclist exceed their quota?


Does democracy mean anything to you?

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

If you think that a minority can be correct while the majority is wrong then you're an idiot. Why should that minority be able to say they are the correct ones?

Is it OK if the majority vote to exterminate all left handed redheads?

Of course.


And how about those with particular religious beliefs?


Definitely of course. Religion is a sign of gross stupidity. We even let the ****wit Muslims into our country who keep killing people.


Why do you care about Muslims if all religion is gross stupidity?


Ban the cyclists, same outcome, no squished cyclists, but more people can continue to use the junction.

Most car crashes are caused by men, lets make 'Driving whilst male' an offence.

Actually they're not. Women cause more crashes, men cause bigger crashes.

Evidence?

DYOFR.


So no evidence to support your claim.


GIYF.


I have no idea what that means but I don't speak child.


Speed and red light cameras are a waste of money because they never catch any number plated vehicles.

I've got them all listed on my satnav so I can flout the stupid law.

Typical spongeing freeloader doelscum motorist.

Try to make less than 2 spelling errors per sentence. Typical illiterate psycholist wannabe tour de france rider in kinky underwear and a learner's helmet.

And what does sponging have to do with breaking petty traffic laws?

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


So it was appropriate.


It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.


So why do you care so much?
  #15  
Old May 23rd 17, 09:12 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 781
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Tue, 23 May 2017 21:03:17 +0100, wrote:

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:00:37 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 19:19:41 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:45:25 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:37:23 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 6:47:13 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:59 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:40:13 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:13:16 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
Drivers have been brazenly flouting a traffic ban at Bank junction which
was brought in to improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians.

The new rules, brought in after the death of a cyclist at the
notoriously busy interchange, were enforced from 7am today. All vehicles
apart from cyclists and buses are banned from using it before 7pm.

But footage taken during the busy morning commute shows drivers
blatantly disregarding the new regulations and driving through.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-a3545041.html

This story and the video are obviously fake.
Only cyclists break the law.

Since there are more drivers than cyclists using that junction, why ban the majority?

Can you provide proof of this?

Just go and stand on any pavement and watch.

We are talking about one particular junction which cars cannot legally use.
Since only cyclists break the law this means there are no cars using that junction.

Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.

How many used it before the restriction?


Same as any other junction, 95% cars, 5% cyclists.


Every junction?
What happens when cyclist exceed their quota?


It's an average you fool. Just go and outside and count cars and cyclists passing anywhere there haven't been silly bans put in place.

Does democracy mean anything to you?

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

If you think that a minority can be correct while the majority is wrong then you're an idiot. Why should that minority be able to say they are the correct ones?

Is it OK if the majority vote to exterminate all left handed redheads?

Of course.

And how about those with particular religious beliefs?


Definitely of course. Religion is a sign of gross stupidity. We even let the ****wit Muslims into our country who keep killing people.


Why do you care about Muslims if all religion is gross stupidity?


Because they're more nuts than the rest, they're the ones that just slaughtered people in Manchester, and before that in London. Yet our stupid government lets them live here.

Ban the cyclists, same outcome, no squished cyclists, but more people can continue to use the junction.

Most car crashes are caused by men, lets make 'Driving whilst male' an offence.

Actually they're not. Women cause more crashes, men cause bigger crashes.

Evidence?

DYOFR.

So no evidence to support your claim.


GIYF.


I have no idea what that means but I don't speak child.


It's a commonly used internet acronym. Google will tell you what it means....

Speed and red light cameras are a waste of money because they never catch any number plated vehicles.

I've got them all listed on my satnav so I can flout the stupid law.

Typical spongeing freeloader doelscum motorist.

Try to make less than 2 spelling errors per sentence. Typical illiterate psycholist wannabe tour de france rider in kinky underwear and a learner's helmet.

And what does sponging have to do with breaking petty traffic laws?

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.


It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.


So why do you care so much?


You're the one that replied to it.

--
My sex life is so bad that when I called one of those phone sex lines,
a voice came on and said, "Not tonight. I have an earache."
  #16  
Old May 24th 17, 10:23 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On 24.05.2017 02:30, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:14 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.05.2017 06:45, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


I'll take your blatherings any way I like.
Thank God I am childish in YOUR eyes.


And 99% of the population.

Allah akbar!
  #17  
Old May 24th 17, 10:26 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On 24.05.2017 07:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.


So it was appropriate.


So why the hell did you include it?
  #18  
Old May 24th 17, 10:28 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On 24.05.2017 08:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.


So why do you care so much?


You're the one that replied to it.


You are the one who posted it.
Anything posted on usenet is fair game for comment.
  #19  
Old May 24th 17, 04:59 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 376
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:12:32 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 21:03:17 +0100, wrote:

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:00:37 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 19:19:41 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:45:25 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:37:23 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 6:47:13 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:59 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:40:13 +0100, wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:13:16 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
Drivers have been brazenly flouting a traffic ban at Bank junction which
was brought in to improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians.

The new rules, brought in after the death of a cyclist at the
notoriously busy interchange, were enforced from 7am today. All vehicles
apart from cyclists and buses are banned from using it before 7pm.

But footage taken during the busy morning commute shows drivers
blatantly disregarding the new regulations and driving through.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-a3545041.html

This story and the video are obviously fake.
Only cyclists break the law.

Since there are more drivers than cyclists using that junction, why ban the majority?

Can you provide proof of this?

Just go and stand on any pavement and watch.

We are talking about one particular junction which cars cannot legally use.
Since only cyclists break the law this means there are no cars using that junction.

Irrelevant, what matters is how many used it before the restriction.

How many used it before the restriction?

Same as any other junction, 95% cars, 5% cyclists.


Every junction?
What happens when cyclist exceed their quota?


It's an average you fool.


Ah yes, the 'you fool' argument that trumps all peer reviewed data.
The world is flat, you fool. There, I just destroyed centuries of proven scientific fact.


Just go and outside and count cars and cyclists passing anywhere there haven't been silly bans put in place.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYXMxDQfHC4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxSwQRmsiUA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WMw7gbuIdU

Maybe you meant to say 95% of car drivers ignore red lights compared to 5% of cyclists.



Does democracy mean anything to you?

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

If you think that a minority can be correct while the majority is wrong then you're an idiot. Why should that minority be able to say they are the correct ones?

Is it OK if the majority vote to exterminate all left handed redheads?

Of course.

And how about those with particular religious beliefs?

Definitely of course. Religion is a sign of gross stupidity. We even let the ****wit Muslims into our country who keep killing people.


Why do you care about Muslims if all religion is gross stupidity?


Because they're more nuts than the rest, they're the ones that just slaughtered people in Manchester, and before that in London. Yet our stupid government lets them live here.

Ban the cyclists, same outcome, no squished cyclists, but more people can continue to use the junction.

Most car crashes are caused by men, lets make 'Driving whilst male' an offence.

Actually they're not. Women cause more crashes, men cause bigger crashes.

Evidence?

DYOFR.

So no evidence to support your claim.

GIYF.


I have no idea what that means but I don't speak child.


It's a commonly used internet acronym. Google will tell you what it means....


I do not speak child and certainly not here to do your bidding.


Speed and red light cameras are a waste of money because they never catch any number plated vehicles.

I've got them all listed on my satnav so I can flout the stupid law.

Typical spongeing freeloader doelscum motorist.

Try to make less than 2 spelling errors per sentence. Typical illiterate psycholist wannabe tour de france rider in kinky underwear and a learner's helmet.

And what does sponging have to do with breaking petty traffic laws?

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

So it was appropriate.

It's a joke, it's not relevant to anyone in particular.


So why do you care so much?


You're the one that replied to it.


You are the one who posted it.
  #20  
Old May 30th 17, 09:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 781
Default Car free Bank junction praised by cyclists... but driversbrazenly flout ban

On Wed, 24 May 2017 10:23:38 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.05.2017 02:30, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:14 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.05.2017 06:45, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

--
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

True story.

It's a sig joke. Using it against me is childish.

I'll take your blatherings any way I like.
Thank God I am childish in YOUR eyes.


And 99% of the population.

Allah akbar!


I meant 99% of the civilised population. Those lot have a mental age of 6.

--
President Bush is rehearsing his speech for the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.
He begins with "Ooo! Ooo! Ooo! Ooo! Ooo!"
Immediately his speech writer rushes over to the lectern and whispers in the President's ear:
"Mr. President, those are the Olympic rings. Your speech is underneath."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Traffic faces ban from notorious Bank junction after cyclist YingTao, 26, killed Bod[_5_] UK 25 December 4th 16 04:53 PM
Moronic drivers and priorities at a junction James Wilkinson UK 21 September 20th 16 04:36 PM
Traffic to be banned from London's Bank junction Alycidon UK 22 October 27th 15 10:15 PM
When can you enter a box junction if your exit does not appear to be free? Simon Mason UK 17 March 15th 12 02:27 PM
Irresponsible cyclists free to get drivers to clear up after them Graculus UK 104 September 28th 09 06:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.