|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
The obvious ways (to me) a
1) If you get chainsuck and end up in a tangled heap on the road, your chainring may be worn out. 2) If you replace the chain and it doesn't fit properly on the chainring, your chainring may be worn out. 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On 5/8/2011 12:43 AM, Ralph Barone wrote:
The obvious ways (to me) a 1) If you get chainsuck and end up in a tangled heap on the road, your chainring may be worn out. 2) If you replace the chain and it doesn't fit properly on the chainring, your chainring may be worn out. 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? There really isn't any way that is cheaper and easier than just using a piece of new/unused chain that is long enough to wrap completely around the ring. -And really, going all the way around is overkill. The chain only needs to wrap halfway around the chainring, in actual use. If it can do that without buckling and you get no other symptoms like skipping under hard pedaling, then forget about it. It's still good. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On May 8, 1:43*am, Ralph Barone wrote:
The obvious ways (to me) a [snip] 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. I run on my "big" ring (44t) most of the time around town and even on tour (1 week per year.) I ride a minimum of 5000km a year, though sometimes hit 8-10,000. That said, I decided to ride 2 chains and one set of sprockets and chainwheels on my bike until it all wore out, and it lasted 5 years. That's on 8-speed Shimano LX gear with barcons that were in friction mode four at least 3 of those years. The 44t ring could have been used on a power saw when it was done! It was actually sharp to the touch. The cranks were still in good shape so I only replaced the one ring (and the cassette, and both chains.) Sadly, I don' t think my current setup will last as long, but it won't be the chainrings' fault. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On May 7, 10:43*pm, Ralph Barone wrote:
Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? I'm interested in various answers to this question, too. (Doug' answer is a good one.) The first time I bought a ramped and pinned crankset I thought they had sent me a defective one. It had short, medium and full length teeth and not all teeth were symmetric like old school chainwheels. Looked like a drunken machinist had taken a crankset and ground it down in a fit of anger. An obviously worn out chainring is not hard to judge, but how do you know when things are just starting to go from good to bad? Ciera |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On May 8, 6:43*am, Ralph Barone wrote:
The obvious ways (to me) a 1) If you get chainsuck and end up in a tangled heap on the road, your chainring may be worn out. 2) If you replace the chain and it doesn't fit properly on the chainring, your chainring may be worn out. 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? The chain slips when you're giving it your all on the chaingang or up the local steep hill. But it's not dead yey, still suitable for single sprockit setup. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On May 8, 12:43*am, Ralph Barone wrote:
The obvious ways (to me) a 1) If you get chainsuck and end up in a tangled heap on the road, your chainring may be worn out. 2) If you replace the chain and it doesn't fit properly on the chainring, your chainring may be worn out. 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? Does it shift funny? Or skip under load? Yes? Does it look a little sharky? Replace it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
On 5/9/2011 1:33 PM, Ciera wrote:
On May 7, 10:43 pm, Ralph wrote: Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? I'm interested in various answers to this question, too. (Doug' answer is a good one.) An obviously worn out chainring is not hard to judge, but how do you know when things are just starting to go from good to bad? Ummm,,,,, the bike skips under hard pedaling? The chain is the main test that's useful, since it's the part that the chainring teeth need to work properly in. I suppose if you wanted to be absolutely certain, you could try wrapping the chain around all the different chainrings and cogs separately to see how it fit to all of them. If you used one or a couple gear combinations a lot more than the others, those rings/cogs might get worn first--so that the worn chain worked well on the worn rings/cogs, but not well on the un-worn ones. Also We Note: to an extent, the chain and cogs/rings wear down equally so that they still work fine together--but if you try to mount a new chain, it can display functional problems on the worn rings. -------- If the chain appeared normal visually and the bike functioned properly, why would you suspect that the chain needed replacing at all? If you're worried about broken links or ejecting pins, that's usually caused by the chain being damaged physically (such as being twisted in a wreck). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
"DougC" wrote in message
... On 5/8/2011 12:43 AM, Ralph Barone wrote: The obvious ways (to me) a 1) If you get chainsuck and end up in a tangled heap on the road, your chainring may be worn out. 2) If you replace the chain and it doesn't fit properly on the chainring, your chainring may be worn out. 3) If it's so far gone that you can see the asymmetrical wear and the "shark fin" profile, your chainring may be worn out. Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? There really isn't any way that is cheaper and easier than just using a piece of new/unused chain that is long enough to wrap completely around the ring. -And really, going all the way around is overkill. The chain only needs to wrap halfway around the chainring, in actual use. If it can do that without buckling and you get no other symptoms like skipping under hard pedaling, then forget about it. It's still good. You can tell a worn chain by wrapping it around a chainring, but curious what you're seeing when you wrap a new chain around a worn chainring. As a chain wears, it actually changes pitch, which is what keeps it from settling properly onto a chainring (since the pitch no longer matches). The pitch on a worn chainring remains constant though. You can certainly detect sloppiness in the fit by the amount the chain can be rotated back & forth on the chainring, but it's nowhere near as obvious as the effect of a change in chain pitch. I have seen a few chainrings so badly worn that they had developed hooks that did in fact snag the chain. Those you could test for in this manner, but you don't have to, since they're visually impressive. Middle chainrings on 9 & 10-speed road bikes are where we often see chainrings worn so badly that they chain will skip on them, with lifespans running from 5,000 to 15,000 miles, depending upon how well the drivetrain is maintained. Prior to STI's pins & ramps, chainring life was considerably longer. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com, then forget about it. It's still good. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
In article ,
DougC wrote: On 5/9/2011 1:33 PM, Ciera wrote: On May 7, 10:43 pm, Ralph wrote: Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? I'm interested in various answers to this question, too. (Doug' answer is a good one.) An obviously worn out chainring is not hard to judge, but how do you know when things are just starting to go from good to bad? Ummm,,,,, the bike skips under hard pedaling? The chain is the main test that's useful, since it's the part that the chainring teeth need to work properly in. I suppose if you wanted to be absolutely certain, you could try wrapping the chain around all the different chainrings and cogs separately to see how it fit to all of them. If you used one or a couple gear combinations a lot more than the others, those rings/cogs might get worn first--so that the worn chain worked well on the worn rings/cogs, but not well on the un-worn ones. Also We Note: to an extent, the chain and cogs/rings wear down equally so that they still work fine together--but if you try to mount a new chain, it can display functional problems on the worn rings. -------- If the chain appeared normal visually and the bike functioned properly, why would you suspect that the chain needed replacing at all? If you're worried about broken links or ejecting pins, that's usually caused by the chain being damaged physically (such as being twisted in a wreck). Let me 'splain some more about my situation. I bought a used bike for the mother in law. It's the right size for her (5' 0"), but for me, it's like a clown on a tricycle, so jumping on and riding it hard isn't really going to work for me. The chain measures out at around 5% elongation, I can see that some gears on the rear cluster have asymmetrical profiles and the chain is a bit floppy on the front chainrings. I could give it to her as is, but the thought of a 70 year old lady taking a header when the chain sucks into the front chainring isn't very appealing. I will probably replace the chain, and possibly the rear cluster, but by the time I add in new chainrings on the front, I may as well just ditch the thing and buy a new bike. Therefore, I am looking for a way to assess the front chainrings that doesn't involve buying a new chain first. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How do you determine that a chainring is worn out?
Ralph Barone wrote:
In article , DougC wrote: On 5/9/2011 1:33 PM, Ciera wrote: On May 7, 10:43 pm, Ralph wrote: Does anyone have advice on diagnosing less obvious cases, without using a new chain as a measuring gauge? I'm interested in various answers to this question, too. (Doug' answer is a good one.) An obviously worn out chainring is not hard to judge, but how do you know when things are just starting to go from good to bad? Ummm,,,,, the bike skips under hard pedaling? The chain is the main test that's useful, since it's the part that the chainring teeth need to work properly in. I suppose if you wanted to be absolutely certain, you could try wrapping the chain around all the different chainrings and cogs separately to see how it fit to all of them. If you used one or a couple gear combinations a lot more than the others, those rings/cogs might get worn first--so that the worn chain worked well on the worn rings/cogs, but not well on the un-worn ones. Also We Note: to an extent, the chain and cogs/rings wear down equally so that they still work fine together--but if you try to mount a new chain, it can display functional problems on the worn rings. -------- If the chain appeared normal visually and the bike functioned properly, why would you suspect that the chain needed replacing at all? If you're worried about broken links or ejecting pins, that's usually caused by the chain being damaged physically (such as being twisted in a wreck). Let me 'splain some more about my situation. I bought a used bike for the mother in law. It's the right size for her (5' 0"), but for me, it's like a clown on a tricycle, so jumping on and riding it hard isn't really going to work for me. The chain measures out at around 5% elongation, I can see that some gears on the rear cluster have asymmetrical profiles and the chain is a bit floppy on the front chainrings. I could give it to her as is, but the thought of a 70 year old lady taking a header when the chain sucks into the front chainring isn't very appealing. I will probably replace the chain, and possibly the rear cluster, but by the time I add in new chainrings on the front, I may as well just ditch the thing and buy a new bike. Therefore, I am looking for a way to assess the front chainrings that doesn't involve buying a new chain first. Unless your 70 year old mother in law is very strong or very heavy, I doubt there will be a problem. Can you pull the chain forward off the chain ring and clear the height of a tooth? Even at this stage, it takes some effort to cause a chain to skip or suck. The tooth profile would need to be very bad for chain suck to be an issue, and then you could always run a file over the back of the teeth to remove the hook. If you can't make it skip or play up while standing on the pedals and going hard off the line, go in peace and be happy! JS. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to determine bike size | William Andersen | Techniques | 6 | September 27th 07 03:50 AM |
how do you determine your skill at MTB'ing? | MANOFTRUTH | Mountain Biking | 9 | December 24th 05 07:01 AM |
How does VO2 test determine % calories from fat? | David Wuertele | Techniques | 2 | April 2nd 05 04:20 PM |
How can you tell when a chainring is worn? | Charles Smith | Techniques | 40 | January 12th 05 07:56 PM |
More Drivel on "Look" Cleats - How Worn is Too Worn? | Suzy Jackson | Australia | 5 | August 22nd 03 07:42 AM |