|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Police use ultrasonic device to make sure drivers stay 3 feet from cyclists
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:39:49 +0700, John B.
wrote: Even better, the bike shops could sell a device consisting of 3 foot "whiskers" connected to a paint ball gun. Touch the "whisker" and BANG! you get indelible evidence that they were too close. I thought of that, but decided that it might give readers too many strange ideas. It really depends on whether you consider this device a passive defense, or an aggressive deterrent. When dealing with the police, methinks a passive defense is better. (See Officer, just look for the car with the vomit yellow mark on the door.) The not so brilliant son of a friend informed his father than his newly purchased air powered paintball gun was harmless. To prove it, he fired a shot at his fathers car, putting a neat dent in the car door. Oops. Also, the theory that the paint washes off with water is rather marginal as it tends to be absorbed by any porous surface such as the redwood siding on my house. https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090326183008AAfd6kw -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Ads |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Police use ultrasonic device to make sure drivers stay 3 feetfrom cyclists
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 9:59:35 PM UTC-4, James wrote:
On 15/06/15 09:25, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:39:44 +1000, James wrote: On 15/06/15 02:45, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 17:55:35 +0700, John B. wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:19:05 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/06/police-use-ultrasonic-device-to-make-sure-drivers-stay-3-feet-from-cyclists/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APlCVp6BW60 http://codaxus.com Nice revenue enhancement. $200 per ticket and $1400 for the hardware. 7 tickets and it's break even. I'll probably need to install an ultrasonic detector on the right side of my car (much like a radar detector) so that I don't get caught. Let the arms race begin. If it is ultra-sonic than why not an ultra-sonic device to send a signal from the car. If they work like I think that they do they ping a signal and measure the time it takes to get a return. If that is correct than a "pinger" in the car should result in a much quicker return and the device might even indicate negative distances :-) "But Officer, how could I have been two feet to his right when I passed him on the left?" Ahem... Is that like an ultrasonic jammer? That wouldn't be very sporting. The FCC regulates RF jammers, but has no jurisdiction over ultrasonic jamming (yet). So much for my guilty conscience. If it's the common 40 KHz range finder type of ultrasonic transducer, it should be easy enough to capture the transmitted burst, and return a delayed echo that makes it look like you're further away. Some variable delay FM junk before the returned delayed echo should convince the receiver that it doesn't have a solid reflection so that it will only use the strong and stable delayed echo. You're making assumptions about the receiver. It may receive the real reflection and correctly realise the close pass before the second delayed echo is received. The incident waves from my jammer will be much stronger than the reflected waves from my vehicle. All I need to do is produce a noisy (random) FM modulated 40 Khz burst, just before I transmit the fake reflected pulse. The noise will either overload the receiver front end, or the FM noise will convince the receiver that it hasn't found a suitably stable reflection. Try it with an ultrasonic tape measure. As long as it's moving toward or away from the target, you won't get a reading. Ultrasonic tape measures use Doppler to determine when NOT to produce a reading. This is especially true of the proposed jammer, where the car and bicycle are parallel and the Doppler shift is minimal. If I feed the receiver some FM modulated noise, it won't display anything. However, as soon as the FM noise stops, and I transmit my fake reflection (phase locked to the incident pulse), the receiver will think it's a nice stable and strong reflection, and produce a valid reading. Actually, I just realized that the jammer could be spewing the FM noise almost continuously, and only needs to be interrupted when it's time to lock onto the incident pulse, and when to provide a fake reflected pulse. Way to complicated. Just continue to spew out high intensity noise in the appropriate band. -- JS Iron Curtain ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Non cyclists make crappy drivers | Simon Weissel | UK | 147 | April 26th 13 05:39 PM |
TfL launches bid to make London's roads safer by emailing drivers & cyclists. separately | Simon Mason | UK | 3 | January 18th 12 07:30 AM |
How long does wreckage stay on the,street before the police take | [email protected] | Recumbent Biking | 4 | January 12th 08 08:09 PM |
"Police forced to" make up laws against cyclists | [email protected] | UK | 8 | May 16th 07 10:59 PM |
has anyone used an ultrasonic device on dogs? | Pat in TX | General | 0 | October 6th 06 03:49 PM |