Anti-Mountain Bike Advocate Attacks Cyclists With Handsaw

On Jun 28, 11:21*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Jun 27, 6:59 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

I am not a stalker,
In your own words ... "I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman

at one time briefly."

Nonsense, I was merely giving him a well deserved kick in his dumb ass.

Those were your own words and your own admission.

not a troll
In your own words ... "I would say that 90% of all trolls to be found

on Usenet are vulgar and disgusting, if not downright criminal (Ed Gin
comes immediately to mind). However, there exists one mighty exception
to the above rule - and that is *Ed Dolan, the Great and Good Troll!"
"I think there are good trolls and there are bad trolls. It goes
without saying of course that I am a good troll"

A good troll is God's gift to humanity. Otherwise, we would all die of
boredom.

Boredom is what you bring to newsgroups. So you admit to being a troll
then? There is no such thing as a good troll. A troll by definition
is in no way GOOD.

and not a nutcase.
Many of your posts stand in contradiction.

You are no more qualified to judge who is a nutcase than is TM.
[...]

Ed Gin was a troll and a scalawag. But he was smarter than you. He did not
remonstrate with you like you did with him. I knew at that point that you
were on the level of a naif. You are a wordsmith, but that will never do
you
any good. You lack the raw intelligence and common sense to size up
others.
I am genius at that. I do indeed know how to pigeon hole others and I can
easily do it after a bit of contact. Unlike you, I am a fast learner.
MORE opinion stated as fact.

One of the major problems with the world is that fools are so certain
of themselves whereas wiser people have doubts. What one chooses to
believe is the reality that one forges. Whether valid or not, ones
behavior is influenced by what one believes. Your tirades are
predicated on intolerance of even the slightest divergence from what
you construe to be true. A reasonable man adapts himself to the world
whereas an unreasonable man attempts to adapt the world to himself.
You are most certainly the latter.

One real significant difference between you and I is obvious. *I

engage people in dialogue, whereas you engage people in monologue. *I
"talk" *TO *people, whereas you "talk" *AT *people. * I convey,
whereas you lecture. *I communicate, whereas you pontificate. *I
accept the notion that some will listen and take things on board and
some will not, whereas you do not. *You demand that everyone listen
and take things on board, with no exception. *I accept the possibility
of a difference of opinion, whereas you do not. *You are a man in need
of an attitude adjustment. *It is always all about you and the hell
with everyone else. *This is not a character trait so much as a
character flaw.

I only post if and when I disagree. Otherwise, I do not bother.

Which is almost all the time since you are such a disagreeable sort.

*Also, I
don't give a damn about people, so why should I talk TO them. I have told
you innumerable times that I am here to kick ass and that is all I am here
for. As such, I am a national treasure and I ought be paid for my services.
It is why I am Great and you aren't.

How telling. Tell it to your therapist. You misspelled GRATE again!

But you are a stalker with no purpose in mind at all.

According to you.

Further, as a stalker,

Quit your incessant whining, already. You have only yourself to blame
for the "stalking" that you have fallen victim of. You intentionally
go trolling for fights. When you encounter a tenacious, formidable
adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled in an embarrassing
no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to disencumber
yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary by
labeling him or her as a stalker. This thinly disguised ploy of yours
has failed countless times. If you really want to escape your self-
inflicted dilemma, then turn tail and slither on out of here.

you do not have any standing to judge others.

According to you.

You must cease *being a
stalker. The best way to accomplish this very simple thing is to post some
content.

Don't believe I requested your advice.

TM will be delighted to accommodate you. He is lonely and is not a
hermit like me.

I think TM is more than capable of speaking for himself. You have no
idea if TM is lonely. Who can possibly be more lonely than a hermit?
As usual, your response in this post is little more that opinion
stated as fact.

Jim McNamara should strive to become humble and self-effacing like Ed Dolan
the Great.

You actually had the gall to use humble and self-effacing in the same
sentence as your name. What a joke.

The way he is going, he will never be a Great Saint like Saint
Edward the Great. Yea, pride goeth before a fall!

It is not unreasonable to assume that most readers are quickly attune
to what and who you are ... an obnoxious, pompous ass with an over-
inflated sense of self-importance. You shouldn't allow your
overactive imagination to mislead you into overestimating your
relevance. You will never be mistaken for a member of the illuminati.

Here's a concept for you. Respect fellow forum members like they were
your friends. Disregard ... you don't have any friends. OK, then
respect this forum like you own it. Disregard ... you think you own
it and respect is a virtue you will never cultivate!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
A good troll is God's gift to humanity. Otherwise, we would all die of
boredom.

Boredom is what you bring to newsgroups. So you admit to being a troll
then? There is no such thing as a good troll. A troll by definition
is in no way GOOD.

Disagree! Every message posted is in a sense a troll. A bad troll was Ed
Gin. A good troll was Ed Dolan. But everything is the same to you because
you have mush for brains.
[...]

Ed Gin was a troll and a scalawag. But he was smarter than you. He did
not
remonstrate with you like you did with him. I knew at that point that
you
were on the level of a naif. You are a wordsmith, but that will never do
you
any good. You lack the raw intelligence and common sense to size up
others.
I am genius at that. I do indeed know how to pigeon hole others and I
can
easily do it after a bit of contact. Unlike you, I am a fast learner.
MORE opinion stated as fact.

One of the major problems with the world is that fools are so certain
of themselves whereas wiser people have doubts. What one chooses to
believe is the reality that one forges. Whether valid or not, ones
behavior is influenced by what one believes. Your tirades are
predicated on intolerance of even the slightest divergence from what
you construe to be true. A reasonable man adapts himself to the world
whereas an unreasonable man attempts to adapt the world to himself.
You are most certainly the latter.

The mass of men are no more capable of reason than is a dumb animal. Take
you for instance!
[...]

But you are a stalker with no purpose in mind at all.

According to you.

Further, as a stalker,

Quit your incessant whining, already. You have only yourself to blame
for the "stalking" that you have fallen victim of. You intentionally
go trolling for fights. When you encounter a tenacious, formidable
adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled in an embarrassing
no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to disencumber
yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary by
labeling him or her as a stalker. This thinly disguised ploy of yours
has failed countless times. If you really want to escape your self-
inflicted dilemma, then turn tail and slither on out of here.

Nothing but a stalker to the bitter end. Such types live off of us Great
Ones. It is how they know they exist. His wife no doubt will not give him
any attention. But he has a couple of dogs. Why does he not avail himself of
their services. Dogs are known to be loyal and faithful even to idiots.
[...]

TM will be delighted to accommodate you. He is lonely and is not a
hermit like me.

I think TM is more than capable of speaking for himself. You have no
idea if TM is lonely. Who can possibly be more lonely than a hermit?
As usual, your response in this post is little more that opinion
stated as fact.

TM just writes for and to himself. You are an idiot not to realize it, just
like you were an idiot not to know how to handle Ed Gin. You are also an
idiot not to know how to handle me. You never learn anything from your
mistakes. It is because you do not know how to evaluate anyone. You are a
naïf. TM is one too. That is why you and he should get along famously.
Instead, you waste your time on me. How pathetic!

Jim McNamara should strive to become humble and self-effacing like Ed
Dolan
the Great.

You actually had the gall to use humble and self-effacing in the same
sentence as your name. What a joke.

The way he is going, he will never be a Great Saint like Saint
Edward the Great. Yea, pride goeth before a fall!

It is not unreasonable to assume that most readers are quickly attune
to what and who you are ... an obnoxious, pompous ass with an over-
inflated sense of self-importance. You shouldn't allow your
overactive imagination to mislead you into overestimating your
relevance. You will never be mistaken for a member of the illuminati.

We Great Ones stand alone!

Here's a concept for you. Respect fellow forum members like they were
your friends. Disregard ... you don't have any friends. OK, then
respect this forum like you own it. Disregard ... you think you own
it and respect is a virtue you will never cultivate!

We Great Ones only respect ourselves! Jeez, this Lilliputian will never get
it!

Jim McNamara has the perfect foil in TM. Together they can go into the
sunset, jabbering gibberish to one another.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Jun 30, 4:37*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

A good troll is God's gift to humanity. Otherwise, we would all die of
boredom.
Boredom is what you bring to newsgroups. So you admit to being a troll

then? *There is no such thing as a good troll. *A troll by definition
is in no way GOOD.

Disagree! Every message posted is in a sense a troll. A bad troll was Ed
Gin. A good troll was Ed Dolan. But everything is the same to you because
you have mush for brains.
[...]

Once again you have seized the opportunity to reveal your vast
ignorance!!!

Obviously you do not know or will not admit to knowing what a troll
really is. A troll is an abusive user who delights in causing discord
in an online community ... someone who purposefully posts
inflammatory, extraneous, off-topic, or even rude, offensive,
controversial, or divisive messages with the primary intent to disrupt
normal on-topic discussion or provoke a desired emotional response.
Trolls are utterly immune to criticism and logical arguments. Trolls
cannot be negotiated or reasoned with. Trolls are generally
sociopathic and, do not feel encumbered or bound by rules etiquette,
common courtesy or social boundaries. Trolls do not feel remorse or
compassion. Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
Trolls view the Internet as a mirror into which they can gaze in
narcissistic rapture. Disrupting a stable newsgroup gives the troll
an illusion of power. Trolls often style themselves as gadflies,
challenging and subverting the dominant discourse and assumptions of
the forum they are trolling. Trolls crave attention, and it matters
not whether it is positive or negative. For trolls, any response is
"recognition" since it serves as a means to garner a twisted sense of
self-importance, itself a satisfying emotional reward for the troll.
Trolls are unable to distinguish between irritation and admiration and
their ego grows in proportion to the number of accumulated response,
regardless of form or content. Trolls dispute this, claiming that
it's a game or joke, but this merely confirms diagnosis. Trolls live
lonely, cowardly lives behind the anonymity of a keyboard, desperately
engaged a mind-numbing, time-wasting, trivial hobby that is their
source of amusement.

Head swollen HEAD Dolan (the GRATE) squarely fits the profile of a
troll as describe immediately above.

Ed Gin was a troll and a scalawag. But he was smarter than you. He did
not
remonstrate with you like you did with him. I knew at that point that
you
were on the level of a naif. You are a wordsmith, but that will never do
you
any good. You lack the raw intelligence and common sense to size up
others.
I am genius at that. I do indeed know how to pigeon hole others and I
can
easily do it after a bit of contact. Unlike you, I am a fast learner.
MORE opinion stated as fact.
One of the major problems with the world is that fools are so certain

of themselves whereas wiser people have doubts. *What one chooses to
believe is the reality that one forges. *Whether valid or not, ones
behavior is influenced by what one believes. *Your tirades are
predicated on intolerance of even the slightest divergence from what
you construe to be true. *A reasonable man adapts himself to the world
whereas an unreasonable man attempts to adapt the world to himself.
You are most certainly the latter.

The mass of men are no more capable of reason than is a dumb animal. Take
you for instance!
[...]

Worthless, errant opinion stated as fact.

But you are a stalker with no purpose in mind at all.
According to you.
Further, as a stalker,
Quit your incessant whining, already. *You have only yourself to blame

for the "stalking" that you have fallen victim of. *You intentionally
go trolling for fights. *When you encounter a tenacious, formidable
adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled in an embarrassing
no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to disencumber
yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary by
labeling him or her as a stalker. *This thinly disguised ploy of yours
has failed countless times. *If you really want to escape your self-
inflicted dilemma, then turn tail and slither on out of here.

Nothing but a stalker to the bitter end. *Such types live off of us Great
Ones. It is how they know they exist. His wife no doubt will not give him
any attention. But he has a couple of dogs. Why does he not avail himself of
their services. Dogs are known to be loyal and faithful even to idiots.
[...]

My wife and I have a great relationship, but thanks for you concern.
As for my dogs, they make better companions than a sorry hermit like
you will ever make for either man or beast.

TM will be delighted to accommodate you. He is lonely and is not a
hermit like me.
I think TM is more than capable of speaking for himself. *You have no

idea if TM is lonely. *Who can possibly be more lonely than a hermit?
As usual, your response in this post is little more that opinion
stated as fact.

TM just writes for and to himself. You are an idiot not to realize it, just
like you were an idiot not to know how to handle Ed Gin.

Can you do no better than monotonous repetition? Just pitiful!!!

You are also an
idiot not to know how to handle me. You never learn anything from your
mistakes. It is because you do not know how to evaluate anyone. You are a
na�f. TM is one too. That is why you and he should get along famously.
Instead, you waste your time on me. How pathetic!

A na�f ??????????

Jim McNamara should strive to become humble and self-effacing like Ed
Dolan
the Great.
You actually had the gall to use humble and self-effacing in the same

sentence as your name. *What a joke.

The way he is going, he will never be a Great Saint like Saint
Edward the Great. Yea, pride goeth before a fall!
It is not unreasonable to assume that most readers are quickly attune

to what and who you are ... an obnoxious, pompous ass with an over-
inflated sense of self-importance. *You shouldn't allow your
overactive imagination to mislead you into overestimating your
relevance. *You will never be mistaken for a member of the illuminati.

We Great Ones stand alone!

YEP ... GRATE ones stand alone because no one wants anything to do
with them.

Here's a concept for you. *Respect fellow forum members like they were

your friends. *Disregard ... you don't have any friends. *OK, then
respect this forum like you own it. *Disregard ... you think you own
it and respect is a virtue you will never cultivate!

We Great Ones only respect ourselves! Jeez, this Lilliputian will never get
it!

Delusional, self-centered megalomaniac!

Jim McNamara has the perfect foil in TM. Together they can go into the
sunset, jabbering gibberish to one another.

E Doaln fears TM and that is why he will not engage TM. His delicate
ego would be in jeopardy of being exposed and made mockery of.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 4:37 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
Disagree! Every message posted is in a sense a troll. A bad troll was Ed
Gin. A good troll was Ed Dolan. But everything is the same to you because
you have mush for brains.
[...]

Once again you have seized the opportunity to reveal your vast
ignorance!!!

Obviously you do not know or will not admit to knowing what a troll
really is. A troll is an abusive user who delights in causing discord
in an online community ... someone who purposefully posts
inflammatory, extraneous, off-topic, or even rude, offensive,
controversial, or divisive messages with the primary intent to disrupt
normal on-topic discussion or provoke a desired emotional response.
Trolls are utterly immune to criticism and logical arguments. Trolls
cannot be negotiated or reasoned with. Trolls are generally
sociopathic and, do not feel encumbered or bound by rules etiquette,
common courtesy or social boundaries. Trolls do not feel remorse or
compassion. Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
Trolls view the Internet as a mirror into which they can gaze in
narcissistic rapture. Disrupting a stable newsgroup gives the troll
an illusion of power. Trolls often style themselves as gadflies,
challenging and subverting the dominant discourse and assumptions of
the forum they are trolling. Trolls crave attention, and it matters
not whether it is positive or negative. For trolls, any response is
"recognition" since it serves as a means to garner a twisted sense of
self-importance, itself a satisfying emotional reward for the troll.
Trolls are unable to distinguish between irritation and admiration and
their ego grows in proportion to the number of accumulated response,
regardless of form or content. Trolls dispute this, claiming that
it's a game or joke, but this merely confirms diagnosis. Trolls live
lonely, cowardly lives behind the anonymity of a keyboard, desperately
engaged a mind-numbing, time-wasting, trivial hobby that is their
source of amusement.

Head swollen HEAD Dolan (the GRATE) squarely fits the profile of a
troll as describe immediately above.

You have just described Ed Gin and yourself in the above definitions. I am
the opposite of all that. My Saintliness even amazes me at times.

The mistake that Jim McNamara and all others like him make is to take Usenet
newsgroups seriously. Such groups, unless moderated by someone more
intelligent than the posters, are a joke. I treat group members the way they
deserve to be treated, with contempt and derision.
[...]

Jim McNamara has the perfect foil in TM. Together they can go into the
sunset, jabbering gibberish to one another.

E Doaln fears TM and that is why he will not engage TM. His delicate
ego would be in jeopardy of being exposed and made mockery of.

I am waiting for you to engage him like you did Ed Gin. TM will make a fool
of you the way Ed Gin did. The difference is that TM is your level of fool
whereas Ed Gin was not. Fools should only engage other fools.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Jun 30, 5:59*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Jun 30, 4:37 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

Disagree! Every message posted is in a sense a troll. A bad troll was Ed
Gin. A good troll was Ed Dolan. But everything is the same to you because
you have mush for brains.
[...]
Once again you have seized the opportunity to reveal your vast

ignorance!!!

Obviously you do not know or will not admit to knowing what a troll

really is. *A troll is an abusive user who delights in causing discord
in an online community ... someone who purposefully posts
inflammatory, extraneous, off-topic, or even rude, offensive,
controversial, or divisive messages with the primary intent to disrupt
normal on-topic discussion or provoke a desired emotional response.
Trolls are utterly immune to criticism and logical arguments. *Trolls
cannot be negotiated or reasoned with. Trolls are generally
sociopathic and, do not feel encumbered or bound by rules etiquette,
common courtesy or social boundaries. *Trolls do not feel remorse or
compassion. *Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
Trolls view the Internet as a mirror into which they can gaze in
narcissistic rapture. *Disrupting a stable newsgroup gives the troll
an illusion of power. *Trolls often style themselves as gadflies,
challenging and subverting the dominant discourse and assumptions of
the forum they are trolling. *Trolls crave attention, and it matters
not whether it is positive or negative. *For trolls, any response is
"recognition" since it serves as a means to garner a twisted sense of
self-importance, itself a satisfying emotional reward for the troll.
Trolls are unable to distinguish between irritation and admiration and
their ego grows in proportion to the number of accumulated response,
regardless of form or content. *Trolls dispute this, claiming that
it's a game or joke, but this merely confirms diagnosis. *Trolls live
lonely, cowardly lives behind the anonymity of a keyboard, desperately
engaged a mind-numbing, time-wasting, trivial hobby that is their
source of amusement.

Head swollen HEAD Dolan (the GRATE) squarely fits the profile of a

troll as describe immediately above.

You have just described Ed Gin and yourself in the above definitions. I am
the opposite of all that. My Saintliness even amazes me at times.

You are either in denial or a liar ... pick ONE. A troll is the most
despised parasite to infest Usenet newsgroups and that is what and who
you are. If you were sufficiently proficient to have written the
aforementioned description, I would have proclaimed it to be an
objective and accurate self-portrait.

The mistake that Jim McNamara and all others like him make is to take Usenet
newsgroups seriously. Such groups, unless moderated by someone more
intelligent than the posters, are a joke. I treat group members the way they
deserve to be treated, with contempt and derision.
[...]

I see that the embittered misanthrope's people skills are hard a work
again. It don't know how even you can tolerate your sorry self.

Jim McNamara has the perfect foil in TM. Together they can go into the
sunset, jabbering gibberish to one another.

Ed Doaln fears TM and that is why he will not engage TM. *His delicate
ego would be in jeopardy of being exposed and made mockery of.

I am waiting for you to engage him like you did Ed Gin. TM will make a fool
of you the way Ed Gin did. The difference is that TM is your level of fool
whereas Ed Gin was not. Fools should only engage other fools.

I have no bone to pick with TM other than his SPAMMING of the
newsgroup, something that he at least does much better than you were
ever capable of no matter how hard you tried. From all your anti-TM
remarks, I can only conclude that you are jealous of the guy. Several
newsgroup, particularly ARBR, were virtually worthless from the day
you showed up anyways, so the TM posts matter not since the ARBR
newsgroup hasn't been about recumbents for a long time and largely
because of you.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Jun 30, 5:59 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
You have just described Ed Gin and yourself in the above definitions. I am
the opposite of all that. My Saintliness even amazes me at times.

You are either in denial or a liar ... pick ONE. A troll is the most
despised parasite to infest Usenet newsgroups and that is what and who
you are. If you were sufficiently proficient to have written the
aforementioned description, I would have proclaimed it to be an
objective and accurate self-portrait.

No one with a brain in his head any longer cares about trolls and stalkers,
both of which you are. Usenet is for idiots - period! TM is the inheritor of
all Usenet newsgroups. I think he is insane myself. Yea, newsgroups are for
insane idiots!
[...]

I am waiting for you to engage him like you did Ed Gin. TM will make a
fool
of you the way Ed Gin did. The difference is that TM is your level of fool
whereas Ed Gin was not. Fools should only engage other fools.

I have no bone to pick with TM other than his SPAMMING of the
newsgroup, something that he at least does much better than you were
ever capable of no matter how hard you tried. From all your anti-TM
remarks, I can only conclude that you are jealous of the guy.

"TM is the inheritor of all Usenet newsgroups. I think he is insane myself.
Yea, newsgroups are for insane idiots!" - Ed Dolan

Several
newsgroup, particularly ARBR, were virtually worthless from the day
you showed up anyways, so the TM posts matter not since the ARBR
newsgroup hasn't been about recumbents for a long time and largely
because of you.

The death throes of ARBR began with you and Ed Gin. I tired to stop your
vendetta nonsense but you were too dense to take the good advice I gave to
you. Tom Sherman thought the whole thing was amusing, but the rest of the
group was permanently turned off by it. You are a disgrace to Usenet. The
shame is all yours!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Jul 1, 5:18*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Jun 30, 5:59 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

You have just described Ed Gin and yourself in the above definitions. I am
the opposite of all that. My Saintliness even amazes me at times.
You are either in denial or a liar ... pick ONE. *A troll is the most

despised parasite to infest Usenet newsgroups and that is what and who
you are. *If you were sufficiently proficient to have written the
aforementioned description, I would have proclaimed it to be an
objective and accurate self-portrait.

No one with a brain in his head any longer cares about trolls and stalkers,
both of which you are.

In your not so humble opinion you mean. Well at least that explains
why you still care because you're brain-dead.

Usenet is for idiots - period! TM is the inheritor of
all Usenet newsgroups. I think he is insane myself. Yea, newsgroups are for
insane idiots!
[...]

I am waiting for you to engage him like you did Ed Gin. TM will make a
fool
of you the way Ed Gin did. The difference is that TM is your level of fool
whereas Ed Gin was not. Fools should only engage other fools.
I have no bone to pick with TM other than his SPAMMING of the

newsgroup, something that he at least does much better than you were
ever capable of no matter how hard you tried. *From all your anti-TM
remarks, I can only conclude that you are jealous of the guy.

"TM is the inheritor of all Usenet newsgroups. I think he is insane myself.
Yea, newsgroups are for insane idiots!" - Ed Dolan

Several

newsgroup, particularly ARBR, were virtually worthless from the day
you showed up anyways, so the TM posts matter not since the ARBR
newsgroup hasn't been about recumbents for a long time and largely
because of you.

The death throes of ARBR began with you and Ed Gin.

In your worthless errant opinion, you mean.

I tired to stop your
vendetta nonsense but you were too dense to take the good advice

Advice which I told you countless times was not requested, needed or
wanted. Being the thick headed numbskull that you are, you refused to
listen.

I gave to
you. Tom Sherman thought the whole thing was amusing, but the rest of the
group was permanently turned off by it. You are a disgrace to Usenet. The
shame is all yours!

Whatever. Rave on fool. At the moment, I am dealing with a sever
shoulder injury suffered at the hands of a driver who ran a stop sign
when I was riding my bike and my father is in hospice care and is not
expected to last only a few more days. I don't expect any compassion
from you. I merely mentioned this to indicate that I have bigger fish
to fry than you who in the greater scheme of things are so not worth
it.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Jul 1, 5:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
No one with a brain in his head any longer cares about trolls and
stalkers,
both of which you are.

In your not so humble opinion you mean. Well at least that explains
why you still care because you're brain-dead.

But I truly don't care. My contempt for newsgroups runneth over.
[...]

I tired to stop your
vendetta nonsense but you were too dense to take the good advice

Advice which I told you countless times was not requested, needed or
wanted. Being the thick headed numbskull that you are, you refused to
listen.

I never listen to my inferiors. Nay, I expect them to listen to me.

I gave to
you. Tom Sherman thought the whole thing was amusing, but the rest of the
group was permanently turned off by it. You are a disgrace to Usenet. The
shame is all yours!

Whatever. Rave on fool. At the moment, I am dealing with a sever
shoulder injury suffered at the hands of a driver who ran a stop sign
when I was riding my bike and my father is in hospice care and is not
expected to last only a few more days. I don't expect any compassion
from you. I merely mentioned this to indicate that I have bigger fish
to fry than you who in the greater scheme of things are so not worth
it.

What transpires on these newsgroups has no relation to reality. I have told
you a hundred times that this is just fun and games to me. You are quite
wrongheaded to ever take any pains with me. I am not your friend and not
even an acquaintance. I only exist in cyberspace like a ghost. I am not
real!

If you are having difficulties, then I sympathize of course. I am amazed
that your father can still be living as I think you told me once that you
were 65. Your father must be in his 90's. That is a good long life. My
father died at age 59 when I was in my early 20's.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Jul 4, 8:59*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Jul 1, 5:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

No one with a brain in his head any longer cares about trolls and
stalkers,
both of which you are.
In your not so humble opinion you mean. *Well at least that explains

why you still care because you're brain-dead.

But I truly don't care. My contempt for newsgroups runneth over.
[...]

Prove it. Leaven and don't return this time.

I tired to stop your
vendetta nonsense but you were too dense to take the good advice
Advice which I told you countless times was not requested, needed or

wanted. *Being the thick headed numbskull that you are, you refused to
listen.

I never listen to my inferiors. Nay, I expect them to listen to me.

You do not expect, you demand. I don't accept unsolicited advice from
my inferiors.

I gave to
you. Tom Sherman thought the whole thing was amusing, but the rest of the
group was permanently turned off by it. You are a disgrace to Usenet. The
shame is all yours!
Whatever. *Rave on fool. *At the moment, I am dealing with a sever

shoulder injury suffered at the hands of a driver who ran a stop sign
when I was riding my bike and my father is in *hospice care and isnot
expected to last only a few more days. *I don't expect any compassion
from you. *I merely mentioned this to indicate that I have bigger fish
to fry than you who in the greater scheme of things are sonotworth
it.

What transpires on these newsgroups has no relation to reality. I have told
you a hundred times that this is just fun and games to me. You are quite
wrongheaded to ever take any pains with me. I am not your friend and not
even an acquaintance. I only exist in cyberspace like a ghost. I am not
real!

If you are having difficulties, then I sympathize of course. I am amazed
that your father can still be living as I think you told me once that you
were 65. Your father must be in his 90's. That is a good long life. My
father died at age 59 when I was in my early 20's.

If you are neither a friend nor even an acquaintance, then you cannot
possible by sympathetic. I am 64. My father is 88 and will never see
is 90's.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

AMENDED REPLY

On Jul 5, 2:22*pm, JimmyMac wrote:
On Jul 4, 8:59*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:

"JimmyMac" wrote in message

....
On Jul 1, 5:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

No one with a brain in his head any longer cares about trolls and
stalkers,
both of which you are.
In your not so humble opinion you mean. *Well at least that explains

why you still care because you're brain-dead.

But I truly don't care. My contempt for newsgroups runneth over.
[...]

Prove it. *Leave and don't return this time.

I tired to stop your
vendetta nonsense but you were too dense to take the good advice
Advice which I told you countless times was not requested, needed or

wanted. *Being the thick headed numbskull that you are, you refused to
listen.

I never listen to my inferiors. Nay, I expect them to listen to me.

You do not expect ... you demand. *I don't accept unsolicited advice
from my inferiors.

I gave to
you. Tom Sherman thought the whole thing was amusing, but the rest of the
group was permanently turned off by it. You are a disgrace to Usenet. The
shame is all yours!
Whatever. *Rave on fool. *At the moment, I am dealing with a severe

shoulder injury suffered at the hands of a driver who ran a stop sign
when I was riding my bike and my father is in *hospice care and isnot
expected to last only a few more days. *I don't expect any compassion
from you. *I merely mentioned this to indicate that I have bigger fish
to fry than you who in the greater scheme of things are sonotworth
it.

What transpires on these newsgroups has no relation to reality. I have told
you a hundred times that this is just fun and games to me.

The number of times something is repeated has no bearing on ithe
relevance or validity, a rudimentary concept that anyone in possession
of any degree of common sense would realize.. If a particular
newsgroup were, by design intent, devoted to fun and games that's OK,
but you seem to think that all newsgroups are your personal cyber
playpen for fun and games regardless of theiti original design intent
and that is not OK no matter how you slice it.

You are quite
wrongheaded to ever take any pains with me. I am not your friend and not
even an acquaintance. I only exist in cyberspace like a ghost. I am not
real!

I know I an not your friend. Hermits have no friends. Insufferable
******* that you are, you could neither make nor keep a friend.

If you are having difficulties, then I sympathize of course. I am amazed
that your father can still be living as I think you told me once that you
were 65. Your father must be in his 90's. That is a good long life. My
father died at age 59 when I was in my early 20's.

Since you are neither a friend nor even an acquaintance, you cannot
possible by sympathetic. I am 64. *My father is 88 and will never see
his 90's.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota