|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after
tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that time--explaination went no where peter |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
On Feb 1, 12:37*pm, "ilaboo" wrote:
went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that time--explaination went no where peter A freind of mine was pulled over in his car and commenced with a huge long-winded yarn about why he had been speeding. The story involved the dog pound, his sister's girlfriend, and went on and on. When he was finished, the officer said that was the goddamndest, stupidest, most bull-**** story he'd ever heard, and chukling, let us go with a warning. The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. Your allegic reaction to medicine wasn't compelling enough. Claim it wasn't you. Joseph |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:43:04 -0800 (PST),
" wrote: On Feb 1, 12:37*pm, "ilaboo" wrote: went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that time--explaination went no where peter A freind of mine was pulled over in his car and commenced with a huge long-winded yarn about why he had been speeding. The story involved the dog pound, his sister's girlfriend, and went on and on. When he was finished, the officer said that was the goddamndest, stupidest, most bull-**** story he'd ever heard, and chukling, let us go with a warning. The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. Your allegic reaction to medicine wasn't compelling enough. Claim it wasn't you. Joseph My favorite story along those lines was driving upstate in NY and getting stopped for speeding. I explained that I was taught in driver's education that it was important to maintain the speed that everyone is doing and that if the speed limit is 55 and everyone is going 70, you have to go 70. I really was taught that. The cop smiled and said: "but you were going 75". But he didn't give me a ticket. I guess it was a good enough line. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
"dgk" wrote in message news On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:43:04 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Feb 1, 12:37 pm, "ilaboo" wrote: went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that time--explaination went no where peter A freind of mine was pulled over in his car and commenced with a huge long-winded yarn about why he had been speeding. The story involved the dog pound, his sister's girlfriend, and went on and on. When he was finished, the officer said that was the goddamndest, stupidest, most bull-**** story he'd ever heard, and chukling, let us go with a warning. The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. Your allegic reaction to medicine wasn't compelling enough. Claim it wasn't you. Joseph My favorite story along those lines was driving upstate in NY and getting stopped for speeding. I explained that I was taught in driver's education that it was important to maintain the speed that everyone is doing and that if the speed limit is 55 and everyone is going 70, you have to go 70. I really was taught that. The cop smiled and said: "but you were going 75". But he didn't give me a ticket. I guess it was a good enough line. i was not making any bs excuse--i could hardly see. tia peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
On Feb 1, 9:27*pm, "ilaboo" wrote:
"dgk" wrote in message news On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:43:04 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Feb 1, 12:37 pm, "ilaboo" wrote: went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that time--explaination went no where peter A freind of mine was pulled over in his car and commenced with a huge long-winded yarn about why he had been speeding. The story involved the dog pound, his sister's girlfriend, and went on and on. When he was finished, the officer said that was the goddamndest, stupidest, most bull-**** story he'd ever heard, and chukling, let us go with a warning. The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. Your allegic reaction to medicine wasn't compelling enough. Claim it wasn't you. Joseph My favorite story along those lines was driving upstate in NY and getting stopped for speeding. I explained that I was taught in driver's education that it was important to maintain the speed that everyone is doing and that if the speed limit is 55 and everyone is going 70, you have to go 70. I really was taught that. The cop smiled and said: "but you were going 75". But he didn't give me a ticket. I guess it was a good enough line. i was not making any bs excuse--i could hardly see. tia peter I know it was true, but the officer just tuned it out as noise. They hear so much bs and real sob stories, that your specifics maybe didn't even interest the officer enough to even form an opinion about your veracity. I suppose your best bet might be to go the mitigating circumstances route and try to get the judge to realize you are a reasonable responsible person. You knew it was wrong to ride on the sidewalk, but under the circumstances, you knew it was best to do so for everyone. You needed to get home expeditiously and not be a danger to yourself and others due to your condition at the time. As you noticed and said in your last post, most of the folks down at court are not exactly model citizens. If you stand out as a "normal" person that will make a big difference with a judge. You don't want to seem like a lunatic or somebody without a full deck. In my experience in traffic court and related places, if you are presentable, pay attention, speak clearly and concisely (and not go off reciting paragraph numbers of various vehicle codes) and don't ramble, you will get as good treatment as possible. Good luck! Joseph |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
ilaboo wrote:
On Feb 1, 12:37 pm, "ilaboo" wrote: went to criminal court ( da bronx) re summons riding bike on sidewalk-after tons of aggrivation--went at 8 am got out at 10.15--$75.00 fine but decided to fight it will post follow up had a massive allergic reaction that day given benadry and steroids--mind confused and disorientated--took short cut as i knew i might not make it home safely--told officer about it ( my eyes wherfe almost closed at that i was not making any bs excuse--i could hardly see. If you could hardly see, should you have been riding at all? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all
manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. =v= Actually, the REAL moral of this story seems to be that most cops are motorists, see the world from a driver's seat, and are sympathetic to the plight of other motorists even when they're jackasses driving as menaces to society. Your speeding friend deserved a ticket, though of course that would only have brought him to traffic court, where consequences are minor and generally waived on any pretense. =v= Bicyclists, on the other hand, usually harm nobody with our infactions, but as nonconformists we are seen as a threat to the public order, and must be ticketed and prosecuted. _Jym_ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
In my experience in traffic court and related places, if you
are presentable, pay attention, speak clearly and concisely (and not go off reciting paragraph numbers of various vehicle codes) and don't ramble, you will get as good treatment as possible. =v= Yeah, never mind the facts or anything (e.g. 40,000 people killed each year in the U.S. by bad drivers). Just look good, and the traffic commissioner -- who's also a motorist -- will see your offense as good clean fun that could happen to anyone. _Jym_ P.S.: Also, have the foresight to be born white. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
On Feb 2, 12:50*pm, Jym Dyer wrote:
The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. =v= Actually, the REAL moral of this story seems to be that most cops are motorists, see the world from a driver's seat, and are sympathetic to the plight of other motorists even when they're jackasses driving as menaces to society. *Your speeding friend deserved a ticket, though of course that would only have brought him to traffic court, where consequences are minor and generally waived on any pretense. =v= Bicyclists, on the other hand, usually harm nobody with our infactions, but as nonconformists we are seen as a threat to the public order, and must be ticketed and prosecuted. * * _Jym_ In The Bronx where the OP was ticketed, in an area where the officer would bother to ticket somebody for sidewalk riding, I'm sure it was a pretty pedestrian area. Listening to some guy with puffy eyes going on about how he is allergic to steroids wasn't very reassuring to the cop. I'm sure if he had pulled over a motorist and got the same story, the consequences would have been even worse. I think you are reading too much into the cop's behavior. He didn't single the OP out because he is a non-comformist whatever that is, he did it because he thought he was doing something dangerous. Joseph |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
criminal court--bike
In article
, " wrote: On Feb 2, 12:50*pm, Jym Dyer wrote: The moral of the story is that police officers have heard all manner of dumb explainations as to why some infraction or other was warranted. =v= Actually, the REAL moral of this story seems to be that most cops are motorists, see the world from a driver's seat, and are sympathetic to the plight of other motorists even when they're jackasses driving as menaces to society. *Your speeding friend deserved a ticket, though of course that would only have brought him to traffic court, where consequences are minor and generally waived on any pretense. =v= Bicyclists, on the other hand, usually harm nobody with our infactions, but as nonconformists we are seen as a threat to the public order, and must be ticketed and prosecuted. * * _Jym_ In The Bronx where the OP was ticketed, in an area where the officer would bother to ticket somebody for sidewalk riding, I'm sure it was a pretty pedestrian area. Listening to some guy with puffy eyes going on about how he is allergic to steroids wasn't very reassuring to the cop. I'm sure if he had pulled over a motorist and got the same story, the consequences would have been even worse. I think you are reading too much into the cop's behavior. He didn't single the OP out because he is a non-comformist whatever that is, he did it because he thought he was doing something dangerous. Joseph I'm pretty sure a motorist would have gotten a bigger fine for driving on the sidewalk, too. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT criminal court | ilaboo[_2_] | General | 4 | January 27th 08 06:51 PM |
Alleged retailer inducements lands bike supplier in court | Andrew Priest | Australia | 9 | September 18th 07 12:50 PM |
YAY - Chicago treating criminal bicyclists same as criminal drivers | Bill Henry | General | 5 | July 27th 05 11:06 AM |
Jim McNamara the Criminal at A.R.B.R. | Jim McNamara | Recumbent Biking | 4 | February 6th 05 07:44 AM |
AL GO CRIMINAL!!! | S o r n i | General | 8 | September 4th 04 02:23 PM |