|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
basket needs nylon https://www.google.com/search?site=i....SGiTItrEOD 4 no complaints for Tubus here ? |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On 4/10/2014 7:31 AM, jbeattie wrote:
snip Apart from the lack of braze-ons, a short wheelbase bike can be problematic with panniers. You get heel strike with some bags. My son's Kona Dewdrop is an over-grown MTB with a high BB. It has a rack, and I whack my knee on it dismounting -- something to do with swinging my leg so high to clear the saddle. Racks have some minor issues. I do like carrying heavy stuff in a pannier on that bike, though -- and of course, racks and panniers are a must for touring. For commuting with a minor amount of stuff, I use a backpack. If I were commuting regularly with a laptop or lots of stuff, I would use a pannier and kludge a rack on my CX bike. You have to choose both the rear rack and the panniers carefully. A lot of rear racks are very short so even with the panniers all the way back you get interference. But you can buy some rear racks that are long enough that when you position the panniers all the way back you eliminate the interference. I think the problem is that a lot of people don't think about rack length when selecting a rear rack and don't realize the problem until it's too late. One of the nicest rear racks, and one of the longest ones, is embarrassingly only available he http://www.landriderbikes.com/accessories_1.asp. It's a Massload CL-476 out of Taiwan, but it's not sold anywhere under that moniker. It's 42 cm long. A Blackurn Expedition Rack is only 32 cm long. That extra 10 cm makes a big difference in heal clearance. Robert Beckman used to make racks with long platforms but apparently he's no longer in business as the website no longer is there. There's also hacks you can do to solve the problem, i.e. http://nordicgroup.us/bicycleluggageracks/rackimages/extender.JPG |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:35:31 AM UTC-4, sms wrote:
On 4/10/2014 7:31 AM, jbeattie wrote: snip Apart from the lack of braze-ons, a short wheelbase bike can be problematic with panniers. You get heel strike with some bags. My son's Kona Dewdrop is an over-grown MTB with a high BB. It has a rack, and I whack my knee on it dismounting -- something to do with swinging my leg so high to clear the saddle. Racks have some minor issues. I do like carrying heavy stuff in a pannier on that bike, though -- and of course, racks and panniers are a must for touring. For commuting with a minor amount of stuff, I use a backpack. If I were commuting regularly with a laptop or lots of stuff, I would use a pannier and kludge a rack on my CX bike. You have to choose both the rear rack and the panniers carefully. A lot of rear racks are very short so even with the panniers all the way back you get interference. But you can buy some rear racks that are long enough that when you position the panniers all the way back you eliminate the interference. I think the problem is that a lot of people don't think about rack length when selecting a rear rack and don't realize the problem until it's too late. One of the nicest rear racks, and one of the longest ones, is embarrassingly only available he http://www.landriderbikes.com/accessories_1.asp. It's a Massload CL-476 out of Taiwan, but it's not sold anywhere under that moniker. It's 42 cm long. A Blackurn Expedition Rack is only 32 cm long. That extra 10 cm makes a big difference in heal clearance. Robert Beckman used to make racks with long platforms but apparently he's no longer in business as the website no longer is there. There's also hacks you can do to solve the problem, i.e. http://nordicgroup.us/bicycleluggageracks/rackimages/extender.JPG For best handling of the bike you want the pannier center of mass to b e over the rear axle. Movingthe weight to far back can result in very squirrely handling especially if there is no load up front to help keep the front wheel touching the pavement of other surface you are riding on. I often see bicycles with the panniers aft of the rear axle or a least a vast majority of the pannier aft of the rear axle and I wonder what the handling of the bicycle must be like especially at speed. Genuine touring frames usally have longer chainstays so that the panner can be mounted in the best position to ensure good handling of the bicycle at various speeds. Moving panniers rearward to avoid heel strike usually introduces handling problems if there is a fair bit of weight in the panniers or on the rack. Cheers |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On 4/11/2014 4:11 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:35:31 AM UTC-4, sms wrote: On 4/10/2014 7:31 AM, jbeattie wrote: snip Apart from the lack of braze-ons, a short wheelbase bike can be problematic with panniers. You get heel strike with some bags. My son's Kona Dewdrop is an over-grown MTB with a high BB. It has a rack, and I whack my knee on it dismounting -- something to do with swinging my leg so high to clear the saddle. Racks have some minor issues. I do like carrying heavy stuff in a pannier on that bike, though -- and of course, racks and panniers are a must for touring. For commuting with a minor amount of stuff, I use a backpack. If I were commuting regularly with a laptop or lots of stuff, I would use a pannier and kludge a rack on my CX bike. You have to choose both the rear rack and the panniers carefully. A lot of rear racks are very short so even with the panniers all the way back you get interference. But you can buy some rear racks that are long enough that when you position the panniers all the way back you eliminate the interference. I think the problem is that a lot of people don't think about rack length when selecting a rear rack and don't realize the problem until it's too late. One of the nicest rear racks, and one of the longest ones, is embarrassingly only available he http://www.landriderbikes.com/accessories_1.asp. It's a Massload CL-476 out of Taiwan, but it's not sold anywhere under that moniker. It's 42 cm long. A Blackurn Expedition Rack is only 32 cm long. That extra 10 cm makes a big difference in heal clearance. Robert Beckman used to make racks with long platforms but apparently he's no longer in business as the website no longer is there. There's also hacks you can do to solve the problem, i.e. http://nordicgroup.us/bicycleluggageracks/rackimages/extender.JPG For best handling of the bike you want the pannier center of mass to b e over the rear axle. Movingthe weight to far back can result in very squirrely handling especially if there is no load up front to help keep the front wheel touching the pavement of other surface you are riding on. I often see bicycles with the panniers aft of the rear axle or a least a vast majority of the pannier aft of the rear axle and I wonder what the handling of the bicycle must be like especially at speed. Genuine touring frames usally have longer chainstays so that the panner can be mounted in the best position to ensure good handling of the bicycle at various speeds. Moving panniers rearward to avoid heel strike usually introduces handling problems if there is a fair bit of weight in the panniers or on the rack. Cheers Agreed. But what is the point of buying a road bike with a short wheel base and trying to turn it into a touring bike? Don't get it. If you want a bike to use as both, there are plenty of options. The Specialized Roubaix that I've mentioned for one. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On 4/11/2014 4:29 PM, Duane wrote:
But what is the point of buying a road bike with a short wheel base and trying to turn it into a touring bike? Don't get it. If you want a bike to use as both, there are plenty of options. The Specialized Roubaix that I've mentioned for one. Well, some reasons people do that a 1) They don't understand that there are different frame designs best suited to different purposes. 2) They already have a bike that they're trying to adapt, rather than buying another one. 3) They're getting a really, really good deal on a bike and don't even want to think about its possible shortcomings. 4) They have too hard a time finding a more suitable bike at a price they can accept. 5) They've been convinced to buy a less-than-optimum bike by an aggressive salesman pushing what he has in stock. 6) They spent too much time reading a bike magazine that over-emphasizes "fast recreational riding" or racing. 7) They think an inch taken off the wheelbase is going to make them much, much faster, or make their ride much, much easier. 8) They don't personally mind the detriments of the mismatch. There are probably other reasons. I've seen all of the above, and of course, they're not mutually exclusive. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On Friday, April 11, 2014 4:29:18 PM UTC-4, Duane wrote:
On 4/11/2014 4:11 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:35:31 AM UTC-4, sms wrote: On 4/10/2014 7:31 AM, jbeattie wrote: snip Apart from the lack of braze-ons, a short wheelbase bike can be problematic with panniers. You get heel strike with some bags. My son's Kona Dewdrop is an over-grown MTB with a high BB. It has a rack, and I whack my knee on it dismounting -- something to do with swinging my leg so high to clear the saddle. Racks have some minor issues. I do like carrying heavy stuff in a pannier on that bike, though -- and of course, racks and panniers are a must for touring. For commuting with a minor amount of stuff, I use a backpack. If I were commuting regularly with a laptop or lots of stuff, I would use a pannier and kludge a rack on my CX bike. You have to choose both the rear rack and the panniers carefully. A lot of rear racks are very short so even with the panniers all the way back you get interference. But you can buy some rear racks that are long enough that when you position the panniers all the way back you eliminate the interference. I think the problem is that a lot of people don't think about rack length when selecting a rear rack and don't realize the problem until it's too late. One of the nicest rear racks, and one of the longest ones, is embarrassingly only available he http://www.landriderbikes.com/accessories_1.asp. It's a Massload CL-476 out of Taiwan, but it's not sold anywhere under that moniker. It's 42 cm long. A Blackurn Expedition Rack is only 32 cm long. That extra 10 cm makes a big difference in heal clearance. Robert Beckman used to make racks with long platforms but apparently he's no longer in business as the website no longer is there. There's also hacks you can do to solve the problem, i.e. http://nordicgroup.us/bicycleluggageracks/rackimages/extender.JPG For best handling of the bike you want the pannier center of mass to b e over the rear axle. Movingthe weight to far back can result in very squirrely handling especially if there is no load up front to help keep the front wheel touching the pavement of other surface you are riding on. I often see bicycles with the panniers aft of the rear axle or a least a vast majority of the pannier aft of the rear axle and I wonder what the handling of the bicycle must be like especially at speed. Genuine touring frames usally have longer chainstays so that the panner can be mounted in the best position to ensure good handling of the bicycle at various speeds. Moving panniers rearward to avoid heel strike usually introduces handling problems if there is a fair bit of weight in the panniers or on the rack. Cheers Agreed. But what is the point of buying a road bike with a short wheel base and trying to turn it into a touring bike? Don't get it. If you want a bike to use as both, there are plenty of options. The Specialized Roubaix that I've mentioned for one. I was replying to SMS as his advice could result in a very squirrley handling bicycle if tthe weight is shifted rearward of the rear axle. The only way I can see to enjoy riding with a rear rack on a short wheelbase bike is to mount very small panniers or a larger trunk bag. People with short wheelbase bikes often use backpacks rather than try to kludge something that is not going to be very enjoyable to use anyway.Just like you wouldn't enter a Clydesdale or Percheron or Shire horse in a race geared to thorougbred horses it's not gret to try to convert a racing geometry bike to long didtance loaded touring. Cheers |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Friday, April 11, 2014 4:29:18 PM UTC-4, Duane wrote: On 4/11/2014 4:11 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:35:31 AM UTC-4, sms wrote: On 4/10/2014 7:31 AM, jbeattie wrote: snip Apart from the lack of braze-ons, a short wheelbase bike can be problematic with panniers. You get heel strike with some bags. My son's Kona Dewdrop is an over-grown MTB with a high BB. It has a rack, and I whack my knee on it dismounting -- something to do with swinging my leg so high to clear the saddle. Racks have some minor issues. I do like carrying heavy stuff in a pannier on that bike, though -- and of course, racks and panniers are a must for touring. For commuting with a minor amount of stuff, I use a backpack. If I were commuting regularly with a laptop or lots of stuff, I would use a pannier and kludge a rack on my CX bike. You have to choose both the rear rack and the panniers carefully. A lot of rear racks are very short so even with the panniers all the way back you get interference. But you can buy some rear racks that are long enough that when you position the panniers all the way back you eliminate the interference. I think the problem is that a lot of people don't think about rack length when selecting a rear rack and don't realize the problem until it's too late. One of the nicest rear racks, and one of the longest ones, is embarrassingly only available he http://www.landriderbikes.com/accessories_1.asp. It's a Massload CL-476 out of Taiwan, but it's not sold anywhere under that moniker. It's 42 cm long. A Blackurn Expedition Rack is only 32 cm long. That extra 10 cm makes a big difference in heal clearance. Robert Beckman used to make racks with long platforms but apparently he's no longer in business as the website no longer is there. There's also hacks you can do to solve the problem, i.e. http://nordicgroup.us/bicycleluggageracks/rackimages/extender.JPG For best handling of the bike you want the pannier center of mass to b e over the rear axle. Movingthe weight to far back can result in very squirrely handling especially if there is no load up front to help keep the front wheel touching the pavement of other surface you are riding on. I often see bicycles with the panniers aft of the rear axle or a least a vast majority of the pannier aft of the rear axle and I wonder what the handling of the bicycle must be like especially at speed. Genuine touring frames usally have longer chainstays so that the panner can be mounted in the best position to ensure good handling of the bicycle at various speeds. Moving panniers rearward to avoid heel strike usually introduces handling problems if there is a fair bit of weight in the panniers or on the rack. Cheers Agreed. But what is the point of buying a road bike with a short wheel base and trying to turn it into a touring bike? Don't get it. If you want a bike to use as both, there are plenty of options. The Specialized Roubaix that I've mentioned for one. I was replying to SMS as his advice could result in a very squirrley handling bicycle if tthe weight is shifted rearward of the rear axle. Right. I was just agreeing. The only way I can see to enjoy riding with a rear rack on a short wheelbase bike is to mount very small panniers or a larger trunk bag. People with short wheelbase bikes often use backpacks rather than try to kludge something that is not going to be very enjoyable to use anyway.Just like you wouldn't enter a Clydesdale or Percheron or Shire horse in a race geared to thorougbred horses it's not gret to try to convert a racing geometry bike to long didtance loaded touring. Cheers -- duane |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
well, upright or relaxed tourers are available over the TdF holdovers....the field is open for consumer choice.
But the racks doahn chose the consumer who has and will always come 429 Mustang/ 430 Challenger/454 Camaro colors with Mitty stripes. HOMBRE ! ?! DIY bag are possible n also possible I'll get a DIY BAG video out if I can persuade Rita into some filmy underwear.... Is possible to remount with a thin 3 layer balsa plywood cut as a trapezoid leaving heels free to revo. Mount the ply then move bag south. The trap when well packed both frees heel and keeps weight near axle. Jute's basket recommend looks a lot like the Chinese waste baskets seen at Walmort. Correspondence and review with the Bikepack crew made my steel Redline CX/Trekker A LOT HEAVIER AND THE BIKE GET HEAVieieieiR every time I pick it up n move it outside so I can walk back into the garage. But around town a bag with skeleton removes a lotta mid distance wear n hassle. until you run it into someone. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
not that the 429 gives snappy handling like a TdF frame...JB recently bought a more relaxed ride in damping CF...a cobblestone racer ?
Tha's what many believe they want......crispness....where snappy handling is tiring over long distances.... people buy 'sports car' n they are buying very low power GT systems but with the bike you GET A SPORTS RACER SYSTEM. if 'they' were happy then wood we see the more relaxed market ? prob. once the sports was saturated. oh right, Lance came out for publicity earlier...I'll go check that..... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Backpack or pannier
On 4/11/2014 5:28 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
The only way I can see to enjoy riding with a rear rack on a short wheelbase bike is to mount very small panniers or a larger trunk bag. People with short wheelbase bikes often use backpacks rather than try to kludge something that is not going to be very enjoyable to use anyway.Just like you wouldn't enter a Clydesdale or Percheron or Shire horse in a race geared to thorougbred horses it's not gret to try to convert a racing geometry bike to long didtance loaded touring. Again, if I had to tour with a short wheelbase bike, I'd go with front panniers, plus maybe a saddlebag. Front panniers put the load on the stronger and more lightly loaded wheel, can give an aerodynamic advantage (mostly from shielding the rotating feet from the wind, I think) and slow the steering a bit, which can be beneficial if you're trying to ride relaxed on a tight bike. I've used that packing scheme (plus a handlebar bag) on some "credit card" tours, although that was on my touring bike, not a short wheelbase bike. The scheme works very well, in my experience. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backpack | dizzykiwi | Unicycling | 16 | September 24th 08 10:42 PM |
uni backpack? | gabetheunicycleman | Unicycling | 5 | January 18th 07 12:30 PM |
Advice wanted: Pannier/backpack combination | beerwolf | Australia | 17 | September 27th 06 01:55 PM |
Uni dog backpack | litldude2 | Unicycling | 0 | January 29th 06 03:05 AM |
backpack | ICP8456 | Unicycling | 0 | April 28th 05 09:43 PM |