A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The death of rim brakes?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old March 11th 19, 12:21 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,538
Default The death of rim brakes?

On 3/10/2019 5:52 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 at 8:34:24 AM UTC-5, wrote:
I keep reading see all the bikes coming out and basically all disc brakes. I cannot believe rim brakes are going to be gone but maybe I am just kidding myself. I frankly hate the disc brake look and certainly for a long time parts will be around but are these rim brakes a dead deal.

Deacon Mark


One of my issues is that I realize we will have rim brake bikes for awhile but I just hope to keep the nice looks and basic set up. If it is not broke don't fix the puppy. The one item I have never experience is the idea on a long descend you can blow a tube. In the flatlands that to me seems impossible. To blow a tube on a long descend does the speed have to be really fast like about 40mph or say at 25mph for a long time. The biggest descend I have done is about 7% grade total for about a mile and the last say 1/4 mile is got to 9%. I could easily feather the brakes to avoid heat but maybe my experience is really limited for true mountain riding. Can you just pull the brakes up pretty good to get to a speed that is comfortable. In my case this descend got me to about 43mph my top speed for sure. Had the it been longer I don't know long I could have continued before I got to damn scared.


Long, long ago I read a technical article in some bike magazine. (There
used to be real technical articles in bike magazines.) This one was
about brake energy (or really, power in the engineering sense of work
per unit time) and temperature rise during long descents.

The article explained that the braking power depended on brake force and
speed. For any given hill, you could always use the brakes to go super
slow. Brake force will be high, but speed will be low and power will be
low, leading to less temperature rise.

Alternately, you could descend very fast, braking only lightly or not at
all. Brake force will be low or zero. (There's also more aerodynamic
cooling.) This too will lead to less temperature rise.

The author claimed, using lots of calculations summarized in graphs,
that the greatest temperature rise occurred by using the brakes to keep
the speed about 30 mph or 50 kph.

Trouble is, this is exactly the speed lots of cyclists choose for long
descents. Any slower and they feel like slugs. Any faster and they get
scared.

I blew only one tire on a downhill, on the rear of our tandem, creeping
down a short ( 1/10 mile) steep grade well over 10%. We just rode the
bike to the bottom and I changed the tube. But I can see it would be a
problem if the front tire blew.


--
- Frank Krygowski
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DuraAce 7800 brakes v. 6600 brakes RS Techniques 4 February 1st 09 05:13 AM
Delta Brakes for sale, capy c group brakes vintage! [email protected] Marketplace 0 December 1st 08 12:47 PM
Generic Brakes vs Dura-Ace 7700 brakes ? RS Techniques 19 June 10th 06 01:30 AM
ANyone fail cast tender eye, death be to you, death come quickly whoreBanger Australia 0 June 3rd 06 11:47 AM
disc brakes on front, v-brakes on rear Per Elmsäter Mountain Biking 24 October 21st 03 10:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.